Preview

How far do you agree that the limited appeal of Mazzini's ideas was the main reason for the slow progress of national unity in Italy in the years 1815-48?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1527 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How far do you agree that the limited appeal of Mazzini's ideas was the main reason for the slow progress of national unity in Italy in the years 1815-48?
How far do you agree that the limited appeal of Mazzini’s ideas was the main reason for the slow progress of national unity in Italy in the years 1815-48?

In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication. The limited appeal of Mazzini’s ideas was a moderate reason for why progress of national unity was slow. His ideology had a heavily religious side, which was therefore unattractive to the atheists or agnostics born under Napoleon’s Church-and-Pope-free rule. As well as this, it caused clashes with other patriots who felt it was in the nationalist cause’s better interest to bend their ideologies towards economic benefits, in order for the movement to appeal to peasants. Additionally, Mazzini made it clear that he desired a democratic system for a single Italy – an idea that would have horrified and been shunned by the aristocrats and those who held positions of power in individual states, as this high status would be lost to those who were voted in. Another section of Mazzini’s ideology which was not well-received by aristocrats and wealthier members of society was his egalitarianism; his desire to end poverty, redistribute wealth through taxation, and establish free and compulsory education. These policies

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mazzini On Nationality

    • 893 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Giuseppe Mazzini (1805­1872), the founder (1831) of Young Italy, was perhaps the leading figure in liberal nationalism. He saw the creation of a democratic Italian state as crucial to Italy 's development.…

    • 893 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although many would argue that sectionalism was more prevalent during the Era of Good feelings, its is clearly proven by many documents from the time, that nationalism played a much more influential role, in economics and…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the period 1896 – 1915, the condition of Italy was relatively in a terrible state in many ways with various political, economic and social problems that hindered the country’s progress. Italy’s Liberal Governments during this period were generally very unsuccessful in dealing with these inherited and growing problems clearly contributing to the end of Liberalism in Italy. More so, the Liberal Government under the rule of Giolitti saw Italy progressing in some circumstances regarding the socio-economic concerns. Nonetheless, it is very comprehensible that the Liberal Governments lacked solving the problems that they faced.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unification of Italy Dbq

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Those who agreed that Italy should be unified argued that Italy would not survive in the separated states, would be vulnerable to invasions, and would ultimately be weaker overall. Giuseppe Mazzini, an attorney who was exiled from Piedmont and wanted Italy to be unified so that he could return to his home said, “Unity, because without unity there can be no true nation, and without unity there is no strength.” (DOC 1) People for unification believed the combining of Italy states would be beneficial in the end. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest from Piedmont, said, “The benefits Italy would gain from a political confederation under the moderating authority of the pontiff are beyond enumeration…would increase the strength of the various princes without damaging their independence; it would remove the causes of disruptive wars and revolutions at home, and make foreign invasions impossible. (DOC 3) Some civilians of these states also agreed that the unification of Italy would be just fine. Jessie White Mario, an English journalist who is obviously an opinionated individual being in the field of journalism said, “…Italy would have been free from foreigners, would have been free, independent, and united, had not monarchy stepped in and substituted the petty longings of dynastic ambition for the great national aim.” (DOC 9) On the other hand, some people felt that the unification of Italy would not bring success, but failure.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Renaissance developed a new and unique form of politics referred to as Despotism. Despotism is a form of government in which a single entity rules with absolute power. The single ruling entity may be an individual, as in an autocracy, or it may be a group, as in an oligarchy. The great Renaissance historian John Addington Symonds refers to the 14th and 15th Centuries in Italy as the “Age of the Despots.” It was under the tyrannies, in the midst of all the wars and revolutions, that the Italians were given the chance to develop their peculiar individuality. This individuality determined the qualities of the Renaissance and affected Europe as a whole. Italy, due to their unique form of politics, was able to lead the way in the education of Western races, and was the first to distinguish Classical and Medieval life.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mazzini’s ideal was that Italy should be unified ‘from below’. He wanted the people of Italy to rise up from their high-powered oppressors, while still maintaining the opinion that if monarchs were prepared and wanted to fight against the Austrian domination, then they should be supported and not hindered. He wanted a ‘brotherhood of the people’ to all move toward greater social equality (Denis Mack Smith described him as having ‘contempt for xenophobia and imperialism) so that all of the people of Italy would unite in order to unify their country. Mazzini also stressed that Italy should be unified ‘by its own efforts’, wanting to avoid any outside help- especially from France- in fear that they may just replace one outside domination by another. However, the limited appeal of his ideas were shown when Italy was eventually united and done more-so from above than it was below- he was described as being ‘disgusted’ by this and criticized the new Italian unified state, describing it as a ‘dead corpse’. It could be argued that Italy could have been unified earlier under Mazzini’s watch if it had not been for how his ‘one overriding aim’ distracted from the main goal of a united Italy.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Italy - Research Paper

    • 10545 Words
    • 43 Pages

    After the decline of the Roman Empire, it took what is now Italy over fourteen centuries to become unified and drive out foreign rule. The state of Italy was formed following the Italian unification movement, known as Risorgimento. Italy installed their first Parliament and declared the Kingdom of Italy in 1861. (Killinger, 2002)…

    • 10545 Words
    • 43 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The political structure of the Italian peninsula prior to 1861 was that of a fragmented group of small kingdoms and principalities. There was no unity whatsoever among the Italian states, and internal violence hindered any progress. The people in the Italian peninsula, though, shared several traits and characteristics; a common language as well as a similar culture, and a historical background. Some Italian leaders began calling for nationalism with the goal of bringing Italy together into a sovereign nation-state with autonomous rule. Giuseppe Mazzini, Giuseppe Garibaldi, and Count Camilo Cavour, may have been the most important of the leaders in the spread of nationalism. Mazzani was known for being the “soul” of Italian nationalism. He had established a secret society called “Young Italy”, an organization dedicated to the efforts to unite Italy. Garibaldi was considered to be the "sword" of Italian nationalism. A private group working for him called the “Red Shirts” conquered forces opposed to unification and forced southern Italy into a cohesive political entity. Count Camilo Cavour was deemed the “mind” in the efforts toward Italian nationalism. Cavour successfully got the aid of France in a war against the Austrians and would eventually put Victor Emmanuel II on the throne of a completely united Italian nation-state in 1861.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far do you agree that the failure of Italian revolutionaries in the years 1820–49 was primarily due to a lack of popular support?…

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, more importantly in my opinion, the end of the war revealed that Italy lacked the diplomatically-savvy leaders because, as “the ruling coalition included many divergent points of view, her traditional system of government made this almost inevitable”.10 The public was confused about national interests and began to question whether the traditional system was really the best, be it the Liberals, the Socialists or the…

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although its roots can be placed as far back as the first half of the eighteenth century, the Risorgimento really gained momentum in the 1820s. Although it began as a republican movement, the end result was quite different. Although there are numerous reasons for the movement’s success, it is without a doubt that Italian unification could not have been achieved without the direction of three key figures: Giuseppe Mazzini, Camillo di Cavour, and Giuseppe Garibaldi. It was under the influence of Mazzini that the Risorgimento gained momentum, because of the political strategies of Cavour it became a realization, and because of the nationalistic campaigns of Garibaldi that it became a success. However, ultimately it was Cavour’s realistic vision of a constitutional monarchy that was realized; Mazzini’s utopian republican ideals and Garibaldi’s intention of dictatorship, although important in the journey towards unification, were diminished.…

    • 2913 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is undeniable that both Camillo de Cavour and Giuseppe Garibaldi both played integral roles in the unification of Italy. These men dedicated their lives to the creation of one cultural and political entity. They also made many great strides towards this unification that very well may have not happened, or at least would not have happened in the same way, if they had not existed. Yet despite this common aim, it is remarkable how much these men differed in their actions and strategies. At times the nature of the actions of these men were so greatly different that they hindered the road to unification. Cavour and Garibaldi, although both dedicated to and aiming for Italian Unification, differed greatly in their methods and actions.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secret societies called Carbonari, which was created and led by Mazzini, who furthered nationalistic feelings and was even imprisoned for the uprisings he caused. Mazzini was an idealist and envisioned a united Italy and devoted his entire life to this goal. Mazzini is also well known for creating another movement called "Young Italy", where he called all Italian patriots to join.…

    • 722 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1815 there was a meeting of the great powers – Britain, Russia, Austria, Prussia and France – to consider the future of Italy after Napoleonic rule had ended. Metternich, the leader of Austria at the time, had various main aims regarding the situation of Italy, the majority of which revolved around stopping French influence and not allowing liberalism which could lead to wars and revolutions, or nationalism which he though would break up the empire. Once established, the principles and aims of the congress focused on providing stability in order to prevent war, establishing a balance of power in Europe by limiting France’s power, retaining legitimacy of rule throughout Italy and stopping the spread of nationalism. In many ways, the states of Italy were returned back to their state prior to 1796 when Napoleonic rule began. However, by 1949 it could be argued that many of the provisions of The Vienna Settlement in relation to Italy had been overthrown due to the various revolutions that took place and the rise in a want for nationalism throughout the country. Whether or not it was completely overthrown however, is debatable.…

    • 1918 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far do you agree that the Catholic Church significantly hindered Italian unity in the years to 1870?…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays