Preview

Mr Mike

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1205 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mr Mike
“ Throughout our history ,we [Americans] have been willing to trade freedom for safety during wartime”(St Luis Post Dispatch Editorial,11 October 2001).This essay will argue that a responsible government has to protect its citizens and this protection will include the use of censorship but it should not resemble an authoritarian country otherwise freedom of speech and free exercise of religion will be lost. An examination will be made about the positive aspects of censorship and why censorship is so vital to our culture,there will also be an examination about the negative impacts of censorship and how some governments try to use it to manipulate its citizens and lastly there will be emphasis to how censorship should and can be used in a democratic society. Derek Jones defines censorship as “ a variety of processes … formal and informal,overt and covert ,conscious and unconscious ,by which restrictions are imposed on the collection ,display ,dissemination, and exchange of information ,opinions ,ideas and imaginative expression”(1990). During the war on terrorism in 2001 the public in the U.S by a slim 53% agreed that is far better the government to censor news that are threatening to national security, 61 percent agreed that the government is providing them an accurate picture of what is the current situation and that the government was not suppressing their freedom of speech and the 70% said that the main reason of censorship was for protection(Pew Research Center for People and the Press, 2001). Other way that censorship helps is to fight 'cyber terrorism' because censorship blocks useful information about power grids and electricity lines,without censorship we would have cyber attacks that could result in dead phone lines ,rolling blackouts and subway train and traffic control shut-downs (Schumer,2002). This all indicate that during the war on terrorism the public in the U.S was happy with how the government was protecting them by the use of censorship

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The book Fahrenheit 451 explains that censorship didn’t start with the government it started with conflict between minority groups and technology that allowed entertainment to be more easily digested without offending anyone.…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Censorship has always been a hot topic in society. The censorship of today is debated just as it was one hundred years ago. Back then, the author of “The Atlantic Monthly” clearly demonstrated that scenes inappropriate from some should not be freely publicized, and from the censorship seen in today’s society, it is clear that he has a valid point.…

    • 337 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Censorship Is Essential to an Open Society". Censorship. Bradley Steffens, Ed. Opposing Viewpoints Digests® Series. Greenhaven Press, 2001.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    B604 RE GCSE

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people believe censorship is important because it gives a level of protection to the public.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Potter Stewart once said, “Censorship reflects a society’s lack of confidence in itself.” Stewart’s personal definition of censorship is constantly portrayed throughout Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451 as readers see free-thoughts being restricted by government efforts. This can be seen first as government-directed firemen burn books to keep citizens from developing their own opinions on matters. Secondly, ideas and questions are kept off limits by distracting people through the technology surrounding them. Finally, censorship is enforced by removing situations where people can ask questions, such as in classrooms at schools. Fahrenheit 451 is a novel that gives us prime examples of ways a government can suppress and censor individual ideas and free thought.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The act of censorship has many consequences, one of them being the inability to think for oneself. If people are not presented with controversial material they won't be able to form their own opinions or ideas. This allows those in power to easily control and brainwash its citizens through censored information. The people of this society have no other choice but to believe the information…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the past twenty or so years information has largely been stored in digital form, providing the current generation of digital natives with access to more and more information in recent years. With this new flow of information available to the public has come increased censoring by the government. However, this is not a new issue as some might believe. Since the first primitive government was established information has been shielded and manipulated from the every day citizens of the world by those in power. The cause fought against information censorship enjoys the same past. For as long as information has been censored there have been those who have fought against it (Newth, 2010). This issue has arisen particularly in the United States, as some believe access to any information that exists is a right protected by the Constitution.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Censorship in Judy Blume

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "Censorship in America: Threats to Freedom of Free Expression in History." American Affairs. Web. 05 Mar. 2010. .…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The X files of censorship

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Democracy is founded on the principles of autonomy of the individual and faith in the competency and fundamental rational nature of all human beings. Using these principles as the major premises of my argument, I will attempt to demonstrate that censorship and book banning are permissible because they violate the freedoms necessary for preserving democracy and the liberty that accompanies that democracy.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The freedom of information is something that North Americans take for granted. However, is it possible that we are actually concealed from the complete truth when it comes to certain matters? Does censorship exist even here, in a continent where freedom is considered to be a fundamental right? The surprising answer is yes, which brings one to ask; why is censorship integral to control? The reason why the dystopian society present in the novel 1984 by George Orwell was able to function was because of censorship, in the form of sanitizing and withholding information, along with supressing opposing ideas. In the real world, all of the aforementioned can be observed, and albeit similar, it is not as extreme. An example would be America’s War on Terror.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebuttal Research Paper

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Censorship according to the Encyclopedia Britannica is "The Act of changing or suppressing speech or writing that is considered subversive of the common good." Censorship, therefore, undermines and is contrary to the First Amendment, which is intended to allow freedom of speech.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship In Canada

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As you browse through the internet, watch television, listen to the radio or even walk down the street, there is something occurring that we take for granted; speech. We take speech for granted because of its freedom in this country and the lack of censorship we have on our words. Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information that is considered by some as objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient. Censorship is most often imposed by governments; however, it is detrimental to democracy and the freedoms we all desire. This thesis will look at how censorship violates privacy laws and Canada’s Charter, is detrimental to the development of new ideas, and how it ultimately ensures…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Defining National Security VS Personal Privacy is a matter of looking at the basic nature of each. From research collected there is a consensus that we need balance. Too much of one hurts the other and vise versa. There are a couple of articles that range from Civil Liberties to the birth of public right to know that support the overall claim. Talks about the effects of censorship in different situations like war and peace will help prove that a balance needs to be forged. The problem here isn’t the definition of personal vs national security, but the survival of each in light of each other. There is history in our nation that explains why impinging on privacy may not be in the best interest of national security or of an individual. Also we will look at when it is appropriate for national security to impinge on personal privacy. You can’t have both without upsetting the balance of all. The claim is that too much national security will limit or demolish personal privacy. Also the same for too much personal privacy or liberty will limit or demolish security. So the question would be “does less personal privacy increase National Security?” My thesis is that too much National Security can destroy a government from the inside out by invading privacy. Democracy can’t trample on freedoms given the people for fear that a democracy no longer exists. “As Lee Strickland (2005) indicates, that ‘Civil liberties are not an obstacle; they’re a vital part of our strength. (P.1.)’” This creates a civil uprising that increases the national threat. It is human nature to inquire of forbidden practices. This is more so the case when laws designed to protect are exploited.…

    • 2438 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Censorship seems to be over used in the united states of america, censorship would be a good thing if it was used when needed instead of being used for unnecessary reasons. Men and women expect censorship to take over their jobs of being parents and protect their children from the harmful things in life, Doing that is not the government's job.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Censorship Justified

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On May 10, 1933 censorship was being poured out in its fullest extent all over Germany. What is the definition of censorship: the control of information and ideas circulated within a society. It is an occurrence that has been used for centuries: the burning of books. From the Catholic Church burning Martin Luther’s 95 Thesis, to new Braille books being burned in Paris in 1842, from the Nazi book burnings, to the comic book burnings in 1948 which occurred in a few states in America. It doesn’t matter the location nor the situation censorship has been and is an issue and will continue to be unless recognized as one. So many governments or dictating powers use censorship to invoke indoctrination. But the only thing that is truly thought provoking, depending on how you look at it, is how well governments or dictating powers manage to enforce censorship so efficiently, so quickly, so prodigiously and all the while keeping it under the rim until the time is right.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics