Preview

Mind over Matter

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
373 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mind over Matter
Mind over Matter The difference between mental illness and insanity is that with insanity the person knows right from wrong they just view it differently. Someone that is mentally insane is a person that has a mental illness that affects the brain. They do not realize their consequences or even realize if the consequence is wrong. People who have a mental illness still have a grip on reality. A person with a mental illness usually knows they have a mental illness, but a person who is insane does not always understand that there is something wrong with their mind. The person moods, feeling and their ability to relate others are affected as well. A person that is mentally insane/criminally insane is able to tell the difference between right and wrong when it comes to their actions. The reason why the McNaughten rule cannot be used to defend a person who drinks and the commit murder is because the McNaughten sates that the person that commits murder does not know right from wrong, but a person that drinks alcohol and then commits murder does know what is right and what is wrong. When someone gets drunk it is self-induced and they bring it on themselves. I think no matter how drunk someone gets they still have a sense of reality and they know right from wrong.
Rational and guilty- Rational and guilty is when an individual fully understands right from wrong and is guilty.
Guilty but insane- Guilty but insane is when the person is insane but is thought to know right from wrong in the situation so they are guilty.
Not guilty by reason of insanity- Not guilty by reason of insanity means the person cannot be guilty because they do not know right from wrong.
I would rule that he is Guilty but insane because he committed the murder, but also he suffers from schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a mental illness that affects the person mind, emotions, behavior and also the person ability to think correctly. It is also depends on if he was taking his schizophrenia
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense
    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Billy Murphy Case Summary
    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Billy Murphy Case Summary

    McMurphy's (Mac) behaviors do not seem to be symptoms of insanity. The case of Durham vs. United States held that "the accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect". Mac was trying to get out of the work farm by acting out and convincing the staff that he was insane. Once he was brought to the ward it was determined by the doctors and Nurse Ratched that he was not insane, but could be dangerous. In 1972 the Durham rule was replaced because of confusion in the courts about the definition of "disease". It was replaced by legal guidelines formulated by the American Law Institute and was combined with the M'Naughten principle. Basically it states that a person is not responsible for a criminal wrongdoing if at the time they do not understand the difference between right and wrong and they have not repeated the criminal offence because of their mental disease. Mac knows the difference between right and wrong and he tells the other patients that they are not insane. At the beginning of the movie when Mac is talking to Dr. Spivey, it is mentioned that Mac has had at least 5 arrests for assault. This shows that he knows that he is wrong, but continues to do…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case
    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Influence Of The Mcnaughton Rules
    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Influence Of The Mcnaughton Rules

    The McNaughton rules were used to decide if a crime was committed by someone who was deemed to be insane at the time of their crime. McNaughton rules were so named after Daniel McNaughton who attempted to kill the current Prime Minister as he had an imaginary grudge against him but for no real reason, just his “state of mind” at the time had led him to believe that so he was found “not guilty by reason of insanity”…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense
    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense

    The Insanity defense first came into England’s radar when Daniel McNaughton, who attempted to murder, Prime Minister Robert Peel. McNaughton Rule became a common law test to determine criminal liability in relation to mentally disturbed defendants. Another notable case is that of Reagan, John Hinckley who in 1981 attempted to assassinate the president.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    The insanity defense is only raised in 1% of cases and then only successful 25% of the time it is used; although its rarity, the legal court has very detailed rules. Most rules describe not guilty by reason of insanity as not being aware of what you were doing in that exact moment. Adam Banner suggests that the Eddie Routh case had an accurate ruling of guilty because of his claim that, “...the disposition is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. It is not ‘not guilty by reason of mental illness’,”. Only Mental Health America would disagree, stating, “The Court has indicated that states may be required to provide at least some minimal defense based on mental illness,”. Coincidently, these changes have not been made thus…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/270 Mind over Matter
    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Psy/270 Mind over Matter

    Rational and guilty explains that the individual did commit the act, knew exactly what he or she was doing, and knew the difference between right and wrong. Guilty but insane describes an individual whom is considered insane, and may be found guilty for their act, however, would require medical treatment for their condition, and once the individual was able to establish normal functioning would then serve their sentence, because of being guilty. Not guilty by reason of insanity explains an individual whom is insane and cannot be held accountable for their act, and therefore is not guilty, however, the individual is more likely to be institutionalized in a mental health facility (varies state to state).…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ohio Insanity Case Analysis
    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ohio Insanity Case Analysis

    This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense
    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Amnesia and Competency to Stand Trial: Can You Defend Yourself Without Memory?
    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Amnesia and Competency to Stand Trial: Can You Defend Yourself Without Memory?

    Despite the notion of popular literature and television that the "insanity defense" is an automatic bye for committing heinous crimes, or even crimes of any sort, forensic psychologists are faced with the task of evaluating the validity of the claim as well as applying the legal standards and precedents when asked to testify regarding competency to stand trial. Making the determination requires evaluating the defendant 's mental state according to the provisos of the DSM-IV as well as integrating the law. This can be particularly difficult because psychology remains a rapidly evolving field and the law can be somewhat resistant to change. The question this paper seeks to answer is whether one can actively participate in his own defense if he has some form of amnesia. As a part of the answer, the author will look at the evolving role of amnesia in the diagnosis of mental illness including the changes that took place with the…

    • 2578 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Examples Of Mental Illness In Macbeth
    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Examples Of Mental Illness In Macbeth

    For starters, the expression, the courtroom definition, and the psychiatrist term of the word “insanity” are all different and all have different connotations. In order to be considered insane in today’s court, you have to be completely separated from reality. As described by Vaknin, “A perpetrator should go unpunished - and be hospitalized instead - only if he is found to be completely divorced from reality by diagnosticians from both sides, a far cry from today’s insanity defense” (2). To prove that a suspect is in fact separated from reality, a few things have to be proven. The first thing to be proven is if the suspect had a diminished capacity. Macbeth showed that he was mentally impaired when he brought the daggers back instead of putting them with the guards and smothering them with blood. Although he knew that he was killing, he was not stable enough to carry out the entire crime. After the first crime, he could not control his behavior anymore. It became out of hand and he wasn’t able to control it anymore. He felt the urge to kill; which proves that he had an irresistible impulse which could no longer be controlled. In a way, he also lacked criminal intent. While he intended to kill, he did it because he believed that killing the king was what he was meant to do.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Tell-Tale Heart Response Essay
    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Tell-Tale Heart Response Essay

    The narrator planned out the murder long before he did it. As he was about to explain how he completed his task, he sounded quite proud. He did make sure to point out that he is not mad and did what he thought was right. “If you still think me mad, you will think so no longer when I describe the wise precautions I took for the concealment of the body.” He remembered all of the things he did the night of the crime. Signs of a mental illness are memory loss. He must be sane if he could clearly state what happened without hesitation. The narrator does not seem one hundred percent trustworthy though. He could be seen as mental for this…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Forensic Psychology
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Forensic Psychology

    Wrightsman’s Psychology and the Legal System, 6e,Forensic Assessment in Criminal Cases: Competence and Insanity, pg; 249 (2011)…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bigger Thomas Analysis
    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bigger Thomas Analysis

    Being completely sane allows people to be responsible for their actions. Bigger Thomas is and should be held accountable for the murders of Mary Dalton and Bessie Mears. He acted out of spite and disgust towards these two women, because of a mistake he made. He cannot plea insanity defense. Mr. Thomas was fully aware of his actions because he tried so hard to cover up his steps, and when he noticed he would be caught he fled the crime scene. Bigger Thomas is fully responsible for his actions; during both murders he acted out of spite because he knew that he would be caught, he also tried to cover up his steps, but failed so he decided to flee the scene.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics