Merlo Understanding the “Crisis” of Marketing
UNDERSTANDING THE “CRISIS” OF MARKETING Omar Merlo, Gregory Whitwell and Bryan A. Lukas The University of Melbourne
Abstract This paper concerns academic debates on the relevance of marketing, by providing an investigation of the alleged "crisis" of marketing. The crisis refers to a decline in marketing 's strategic role within organisations, and has been discussed in different forms for at least two decades This paper provides a systematic analysis of the alleged crisis and, after carefully analysing the relevant literature, provides a categorisation of the symptoms of the crisis. This in turn provides the basis for an outline of research propositions that can be used for an empirical analysis of the alleged crisis.
Introduction As early as the beginning of the 1980s, marketing academics bemoaned an apparent decline in marketing’s strategic role (Day and Wensley 1983). In recent years, such claims have been made more stridently and with greater frequency (e.g., Day and Montgomery 1999; Doyle 2000; Piercy 2000; Webster 1997). Typical is Webster (1997, p. 49), who argues that, “for the past two or three decades, marketing has effectively ceded its strategic responsibilities to other organizational specialists who have not, until recently, been guided by the voice of the customer”. Such has been the decline in marketing’s strategic influence, Webster and others suggest, that marketing is now in “crisis”. This paper provides a systematic analysis of the alleged crisis of marketing. It examines and categorises the views of marketing academics on the major “symptoms” of marketing’s malaise, and suggests a number of research propositions. Furthermore, a number of important questions regarding the future of marketing are explored in order to discern the impact of the “new” economy on the alleged crisis of marketing. The paper is organized as follows. We begin by reviewing the marketing literature to uncover a number of key indicators of marketing’s crisis.
Abstract This paper concerns academic debates on the relevance of marketing, by providing an investigation of the alleged "crisis" of marketing. The crisis refers to a decline in marketing 's strategic role within organisations, and has been discussed in different forms for at least two decades This paper provides a systematic analysis of the alleged crisis and, after carefully analysing the relevant literature, provides a categorisation of the symptoms of the crisis. This in turn provides the basis for an outline of research propositions that can be used for an empirical analysis of the alleged crisis.
Introduction As early as the beginning of the 1980s, marketing academics bemoaned an apparent decline in marketing’s strategic role (Day and Wensley 1983). In recent years, such claims have been made more stridently and with greater frequency (e.g., Day and Montgomery 1999; Doyle 2000; Piercy 2000; Webster 1997). Typical is Webster (1997, p. 49), who argues that, “for the past two or three decades, marketing has effectively ceded its strategic responsibilities to other organizational specialists who have not, until recently, been guided by the voice of the customer”. Such has been the decline in marketing’s strategic influence, Webster and others suggest, that marketing is now in “crisis”. This paper provides a systematic analysis of the alleged crisis of marketing. It examines and categorises the views of marketing academics on the major “symptoms” of marketing’s malaise, and suggests a number of research propositions. Furthermore, a number of important questions regarding the future of marketing are explored in order to discern the impact of the “new” economy on the alleged crisis of marketing. The paper is organized as follows. We begin by reviewing the marketing literature to uncover a number of key indicators of marketing’s crisis.
Bibliography: Anderson, P.F. (1982) “Marketing, Strategic Planning and the Theory of the Company,” Journal of Marketing, Spring. Berelson, B. (1952) Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Hafner Press. Biggadike, Ralph E. (1981) “The Contributions of Marketing to Strategic Management,” The Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 621-33. Day, George S. (1994) “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,” Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37-53. --- (1992) “Marketing’s Contribution to the Strategy Dialogue,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20 (Fall), 323-329. --- and Montgomery, David B. (1999) “Charting New Directions for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 63, 3-14. --- and Wensley, Robin (1998) “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority,” Journal of Marketing, 52, 1-20. ---, Kerin, Roger A., and Varadarajan, P. Rajan (1992) ”Marketing 's Contribution to the Strategy Dialogue; Marketing 's Contribution to the Strategy Dialogue Revisited; Marketing 's Contribution to Strategy: The View from a Different Looking Glass,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Fall, 232-343. ---, Reibstein, D. J. and Gunther, R. E. (1997) “Introduction,” in G.S. Day, D.J. Reibstein, and R.E. Gunther (eds) Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Deshpandé, Rohit, Farley, John U., and Webster, Frederick E. Jr. (1993) “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 52, 23-36. Doyle, Peter (2000) Value-Based Marketing: Marketing Strategies for Corporate Growth and Shareholder Value. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Haeckel, Stephan H. (1997), “Preface”, in Reflections on the Futures of Marketing. Lehmann, D. R. and Jocz, R. (eds) Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, ix- xvi. Homburg, Christian, Workman, John P. Jr, and Krohmer, Harley (1999) “Marketing’s Influence within the Firm,” Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 1-17. ---, Workman, John P. Jr, and Jensen, Ove (2000) “Fundamental Changes in Marketing Organization: The Movement Toward a Customer-Focused Organizational Structure,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(4), 459-78. Hutt, Michael D., and Speh, Thomas W. (1984), “The Marketing Strategy Center: Diagnosing the Industrial Marketer’s Interdisciplinary Role,” Journal of Marketing, 48 (Fall), 53-61. Jaworski, Bernard J., and Kohli, Ajay K. (1993) “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, 57, 53-70. Kohli, Ajay K., and Jaworski, Bernard J. (1990) “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Management Implications,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (April), 1-18. ---, Jaworski, Bernard J., and Kumar, Ajith (1993) “MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation,” Journal of Marketing, 54, 1-18. McKenna, Regis (1997) Real Time: Preparing for the Age of the Never Satisfied Customer. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Moorman, Christine, and Rust, Roland T. (1999) “The Role of Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 180-97. Naccarato, John L., and Neuendorf, Kimberly A. (1998) “Content Analysis as a Predictive Methodology: Recall, Readership and Evaluation of Business-to-Business Advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (May/June), 19-33. Narver, John C., and Slater, Stanley F. (1990) “The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (October), 20-35. Piercy, Nigel (2000) Market-Led Strategic Change. Transforming the Process of Going to Market. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. --- (1998), “Marketing Implementation: The Implications of Marketing Paradigm Weakness for the Strategy Execution Process,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3), 222-236. Rachal, J. R., and Sargent, S. F. (1995) “Publication Productivity of North American Institutions in Selected Adult Education Journals,” Adult Education Quarterly, 45, 63-78. Ruekert, Robert W., and Walker, Orville C. Jr. (1987), “Marketing’s Interaction with other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (January), 1-19. Shaw, Robert (1999) Improving Marketing Effectiveness: The Methods and Tools that Work Best. London: The Economist Books. Sheth, J.N., R.S. Sisodia, and A. Sharma (2000), “The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer-Centric Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 5566. Slater, Stanley F., and Narver, John C. (2000) “The Positive Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability: A Balanced Replication,” Journal of Business Research, 48, 69-73. Srivastava, Rajendra K., Shervani, Tasadduq A., and Fahey, Liam (1998) “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2-19. Varadarajan, P. Rajan, and Jayachandran, Satish (1999) “Marketing Strategy: An Assessment of the State of the Field and Outlook,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 120-143. Webster, Frederick E., Jr. (1997), “The Future Role of Marketing in the Organization”, in Reflections on the Futures of Marketing. Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine Jocz, eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute. --- (1992), “The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (October), 1-17. --- (1981) “Top Management’s Concerns About Marketing: Issues for the 1980’s,” Journal of Marketing, 45(3), 9-17. ---, and Robertson, Thomas S. (1983), “Marketing Strategy: New Directions for Theory and Research,” Journal of Marketing, 47 (Spring), 12-25.