Preview

Matrix vs. Skepticism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
988 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Matrix vs. Skepticism
Skepticism and The Matrix What is skepticism? Skepticism to me is not knowing or being able to trust anything. However, that was my original opinion, now going through and from what I’ve learned and read, I believe that skepticism is a doubting of claims in which are set forth in various areas, along with what I mentioned above. Having knowledge of an outside world is basically believing that waking life is but a dream, and there is something beyond what we are experiencing now, that there is a reality and what most refer to as the Matrix. Matrix is defined as such; something within or from which something else originates, develops, or takes form (merriam-webster.com). To me, this is like our dream, which is another state, or in this case would stem from the actual outside (real) world. Ultimately with those things in mind, and having this knowledge, allow you to be able to doubt, and truly question yourself, your life, and everything around you. The Cartesian Argument is Descartes way of explaining the theory of skepticism. It is a perfect situation in which Descartes explains that he is in a warm room by a fire, wearing his pajamas, and holding a piece of paper. At this same time, Descartes realizes that this could be a dream, because he can dream the same thing. From this conclusion, Descartes realizes that he cannot trust his senses because he cannot prove he is or is not dreaming. This is where I start to disagree with skepticism and slightly Descartes, after reading some of his meditations and upon seeing the movie The Matrix, I believe that there is a certain point in which, you realize what is real and what is not real. For example, the scene in the movie, where Neo has to answer the phone, and then is shot dead in “the matrix” but, when Trinity whispers in the dead Neo’s ear, “its not real Neo, none of it is.” He then Comes back to life and is no longer effected by the Matrix because he realizes and is able to separate the real world from the fake.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    We might question the certitude of the Method of Doubt, but his arguments are accurate and conclusive, but he presents sufficient evidence to call his senses into doubt. I think that Descartes does indeed succeed in giving good reasons for doubting his senses. The sensory system cannot be fully relied on, because it is not a controlled variable, and therefore the accuracy can be questioned. This flaw is due to the fact that the sensory system can be influenced by internal and external factors. Descartes gives the reason that our senses are not reliable when it comes to far and distant objects is a good reason because it is self-explanatory in the sense that human eyesight is limited and therefore, our senses may confuse these objects. Therefore, we have proof that trusting our senses is not…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Epistemology and Skepticism: How does The Matrix illustrate the challenge of skepticism about the external world? Explain, discuss, and critically evaluate the hallucination argument for complete epistemological skepticism. Be sure your essay includes a discussion of either Hospers' or Crumley II's criticism of complete epistemological skepticism. Is complete epistemological skepticism a logically coherent theory? Support your answer with a well-reasoned argument free of any major errors of fact, fallacy or logical contradiction.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DOUBT MOVIE QUESTIONS

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Doubt is known as a feeling of uncertainty and lack of conviction. It describes a feeling of a person when he/she feels uncertain and confused about a certain situation due to lack of knowledge, proof, or even experience.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skepticism is the philosophical position that one should refrain from making truth claims, and avoid the statement of final truths. This is not necessarily quite the same as claiming that truth is impossible, but is often also used to cover the position that there is no such thing as certainty in human knowledge. In philosophy, it is an inquiry, a method of obtaining knowledge through systematic doubt and continual…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many parallels to be drawn between Descartes’ theory of skepticism and the movie The Truman Show. Firstly, just as Descartes becomes skeptical that the reality that he perceives is not the truth, Truman begins to question the world he inhabits after a series of events. This series of events includes seeing his father who he thought was dead, a voice on the radio narrating his every move, and everyone seemingly watching him in the town square, just to name a few. While he does not question the things around him the way Descartes does, he does question the authenticity of the events of his life.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certainty vs. Doubt

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Doubt is often viewed as a negative idea in our modern society, but in reality is very beneficially, when used correctly. It is not completely contradictive of certainty, but more somewhere in between the two. The World English Dictionary’s definition of doubt is “a lack of belief or conviction about something.” We should accept the fact that doubt is a part of us, as a human race, because it is part of our nature. We are curious from birth, and to question anything and everything that we want to know more about is perfectly acceptable. I feel that it’s more in the levels of doubt that we use, that we should start to feel worried. Take building a house of cards, for example. Every card we add brings the risk of…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Here he gives the Ontological Argument. Up until now Descartes has been trying to prove that we can trust all of our experiences and that the world is the way it seems. By Meditation Five Descartes has managed to conclude that we can trust our clear and distinct perceptions when we perceive them. When we don’t perceive though, there is room for doubt and we cannot trust our knowledge. Descartes then drew the conclusion that God is the cause of all our clear and distinct perceptions and as God isn’t a deceiver we can trust our perceptions.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Have you ever considered the possibility that the fundamental makeup of our universe is something completely different from what science has led us to believe? Perhaps our world isn’t made up of protons, electrons, atoms, and molecules, and that all of our theories of quantum mechanics and macro/microphysics turn out to be incorrect. Perhaps we were created for a greater (or smaller) purpose than we are aware of. How would you react if you were to learn that our universe is nothing as we thought it to be? For David Chalmers, he believes that we should not be alarmed or afraid of a drastic change in what we think of as reality; granted, this altered reality presents itself plausible in theory. In his paper, The Matrix as Metaphysics, Chalmers explores the possibility of our world being similar to that of the one in the movie The Matrix (details of what type of world this is will be explained later), and asserts that it…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first doubt that Descartes highlights is that of his senses. He says that all of the information he has received has been through his senses and that sometimes his senses mislead him. Descartes is sure in his existence. To him, this is impossible to doubt and he justifies this…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Paper

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes establishes that in order to know what in fact exists, one must first take everything off the table and then see what can be put back. The conclusion is that in order to be certain that one is a thinking thing; one must know what it takes to be certain. “All those things I perceive very clearly and very distinctly are true”(Pg. 53). This general rule however, requires that all doubt must be removed. This can only be done if God both exists and is not a deceiver. Descartes then breaks substances down into those that have objective reality and those with formal reality. It is clear that the idea of God must have more objective reality than formal reality. However, the idea itself is so great that Descartes believes that he could not have come up with it by himself. Since he himself is a finite substance, it is assumed that something infinite would be the only thing that could envision the idea of the infinite in the first place. Therefore, God must exist and cannot be a deceiver because he would not allow Descartes to not be able to clearly and distinctly perceive. This argument then rests on Descartes proof of the existence of God, which can only be erroneous if Descartes clarity and distinctness rule is incorrect. Since the argument of God is used for the validation of the clarity and distinctness rule, and the rule itself implicitly must prove that God exists, the Cartesian circle is created. For an argument to be circular, one of the premises must be reliant upon the conclusion for its truth. If you touch on one argument, you touch on both. There are a few ways out of the circle.…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetoric Of Skepticism

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page

    Those who follow the philosophy of skepticism simply doubt all truth. But is the skeptic skeptical of skepticism; does he doubt his own truth claim? If so, then why pay attention to skepticism? If not, then we can be sure of at least one thing (in other words, absolute truth exists)—skepticism, which, ironically, becomes absolute truth in that case. The agnostic says you can’t know the truth. Yet the mindset is self-defeating because it claims to know at least one truth: that you can’t know truth.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Descartes’ argument for God’s existence involves a circular argument, the Cartesian circle, as he relies upon the principles of clarity and distinctness to argue for the existence of God, and then claims that God is the guarantor of his clear and distinct ideas. Descartes says that we are sure that what we clearly and distinctly perceive is true only because God exists. However, how can we be sure that God exists only because we clearly and distinctly perceive this. Before we can be sure that God exists, we need to be able to prove that whatever we perceive clearly and distinctly is true. The proof for clear and distinct perceptions does not hold. So, because we still do not have a solid reason to think that what we clearly and distinctly perceive outside of ourselves is true, we have no reason to trust our ability to reason about other things, such as God, which means we can prove without a shadow of a doubt that God is not a…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes has two arguments for skepticism, the first the dream argument and then second the evil demon argument. Both examples are used to raise doubts in things that we may commonly believe to be true. It seems right to believe that if you know something then you cannot doubt that thing, but Descartes wants to be certain in every way that he does in fact know that thing. These two examples are used to bring skepticism into your knowledge of things. For example, I know that I am taking a test, but how do I know if I am not dreaming and I am home asleep, or some evil demon is deceiving me into thinking that I am taking a test when in reality I am not.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skepticism Is Inaccurate

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I can not believe what is claimed when there is a chance that these claims may be fallacious or inaccurate. When most people hear the term skepticism used philosophically they tend to associate and think of it only as a constant behavior and attitude of death and doubt. People fail to realize that Skepticism is merely the philosophical view of the uncertainty of the world as it is. Skepticism comes from the word skeptesthai meaning examine, and Skepsis meaning investigation. Skepticism began during fifth century B.C. when Greek philosophers began to question knowledge and discoveries. Skepticism began with Gorgias when he claimed “...nothing exists; if anything does exist, it cannot be known; if anything exists and can be known, it cannot be…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays