Mass Communication
MASS COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2006, 9(4), 461–483
Media Dissociation, Internet Use, and
Antiwar Political Participation:
A Case Study of Political Dissent and
Action Against the War in Iraq
Hyunseo Hwang
School of Journalism & Mass Communication
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Michael Schmierbach
Department of Communication
College of Charleston
Hye-Jin Paek
Department of Advertising/Public Relations
University of Georgia
Homero Gil de Zuniga and Dhavan Shah
School of Journalism & Mass Communication
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Media are thought to exert social control over dissenters by discouraging political expression and oppositional activities during periods of conflict. With the rise of the
Internet, however, people play an increasingly active role in their media interactions, potentially reducing this media influence and increasing dissenters’ likelihood of speaking out and taking action. To understand what spurs some dissenters to become politically active, we conceptualize the perceived discrepancy between mainstream media portrayals and an individual’s own views as “media dissociation.” This study, then, explores if people who are alienated from mainstream media engage in information gathering and discussion via the Internet, and whether these
Correspondence should be addressed to Hyunseo Hwang, School of Journalism and Mass
Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 5014 Vilas Communication Hall, 821 University
Avenue, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: hyunseohwang@wisc.eduonline behaviors lead to political participation aimed at social change. A Web-based survey of political dissenters conducted during the start of the U.S.-led invasion of
Iraq (N = 307) provides the case study data used to test relationships among media dissociation, Internet use, and antiwar activism. Structural equation modeling revealed that the more the individuals surveyed felt their views differed from mainstream media portrayals, the
Media Dissociation, Internet Use, and
Antiwar Political Participation:
A Case Study of Political Dissent and
Action Against the War in Iraq
Hyunseo Hwang
School of Journalism & Mass Communication
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Michael Schmierbach
Department of Communication
College of Charleston
Hye-Jin Paek
Department of Advertising/Public Relations
University of Georgia
Homero Gil de Zuniga and Dhavan Shah
School of Journalism & Mass Communication
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Media are thought to exert social control over dissenters by discouraging political expression and oppositional activities during periods of conflict. With the rise of the
Internet, however, people play an increasingly active role in their media interactions, potentially reducing this media influence and increasing dissenters’ likelihood of speaking out and taking action. To understand what spurs some dissenters to become politically active, we conceptualize the perceived discrepancy between mainstream media portrayals and an individual’s own views as “media dissociation.” This study, then, explores if people who are alienated from mainstream media engage in information gathering and discussion via the Internet, and whether these
Correspondence should be addressed to Hyunseo Hwang, School of Journalism and Mass
Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 5014 Vilas Communication Hall, 821 University
Avenue, Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: hyunseohwang@wisc.eduonline behaviors lead to political participation aimed at social change. A Web-based survey of political dissenters conducted during the start of the U.S.-led invasion of
Iraq (N = 307) provides the case study data used to test relationships among media dissociation, Internet use, and antiwar activism. Structural equation modeling revealed that the more the individuals surveyed felt their views differed from mainstream media portrayals, the
References: Adams, J. S. (1961). Reduction of cognitive dissonance by seeking consonant information. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 62, 74–78. Althaus, S. L. (2003). When news norms collide, follow the lead: New evidence for press independence. Political Communication, 20, 381–414. Ayers, J. (2001, August). Transnational activism in the Americas: The Internet and mobilizing against the FTAA Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model or mass-media effects. Communication Research, 3, 3–21. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES—A resource model of politicalparticipation. American Political Science Review, 89, 271–294. Brodbeck, M. (1956). The role of small group in mediating the effects of propaganda. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 166–170. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J Cho, J., Gil de Zuniga, H., Rojas, H., & Shah, D. (2003). Beyond access: The digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications Christen, C. T., Kannaovakun, P., & Gunther, A. (2002). Hostile media perceptions: Partisan assessments of press and public during the 1997 UPS strike. Political Communication, 19, 423-436. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2002). Selective exposure and dissonance after decisions. Psychological Reports, 91, 527–532. Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (1999). Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Denning, D Domke, D. (2004). God willing? Political fundamentalism in the White House, the “war on terror,” and the echoing press.Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto. Domke, D., Watts, M. D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. V. (1999). The politics of conservative elites and the “liberal media” argument Ehrlich, D., Guttmann, I., Schonbach, P., & Mills, J. (1957). Post-decision exposure to relevant information. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 98–102. Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Eveland, W. P., & Shah, D. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias Feather, N. T. (1962). Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: A study of cognitive dissonance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 14, 55–64 Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Fredin, E. S., Kosicki, G. M., & Becker, L. B. (1996). Cognitive strategies for media use during a presidential campaign. Political Communication, 13, 23–42. Glynn, C POLITICAL DISSENT ONLINE 479Gunther, A. C., & Chia, S. C. Y. (2001). Predicting pluralistic ignorance: The hostile media perception and its consequences Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (1999). Effects of news slant and base rate information on perceived public opinion Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (2002). Projection or persuasive press? Contrary effects of personal opinion ad perceived news coverage on estimates of public opinion Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide.Chicago: Scientific Software. Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2003). From here to obscurity: The internet and media substitution theory King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations and barriers steps toward participation in social movements Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, J. M. (1990). Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies Lanzetta, J. T., & Driscoll, J. M. (1968). Effects of uncertainty and importance on information search in decision making Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity process within groups Luther, C. A., & Miller, M. M. (2005). Framing of the 2003 U.S.-Iraq war demonstrations: An analysis of news and partisan texts Massing, M. (2004). Now they tell us: The American press and Iraq. New York: New York Review Books. Maybury, M. (2000). News on demand. Communications of the ACM, 43, 32–34 McAdam, D McAdam, D., & Paulsen, R. (1993). Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. McLeod, D. M., & Hertog, J. K. (1992). The manufacture of public opinion by reporters: Informal cues for public perceptions of protest groups McLeod, D. M., & Hertog, J. K. (1999). Social control, social change and mass media’s role in the regulation of protest groups. In D. Demers & K. Viswanath (eds.), Mass media, social control, and social change: A macrosocial perspective (pp McLeod, J. M., Daily, K., Guo, Z. S., Eveland, W. P., Bayer, J., & Yang, S. C. (1996). Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23, 179–209. McLeod, J. M., Kosicki, G. M., & Pan, Z. (1991). On understanding and misunderstanding media effects. Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present. London: Hutchinson. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Merskin, D. (1999). Media dependency theory: Origins and directions. In D. Demers & K. Viswanath (Eds.),Mass media, social control, and social change (pp 480 HWANG ET AL.Mills, J., Aronson, E., & Robinson, H. (1961). Selectivity in exposure to information. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 250–253. Mills, J., & Ross, A. (1964). Effects of commitment and certainty upon interest in supporting information. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 552–555. Mueller, J. E. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. The American Political Science Review, 64, 18–34. Mueller, C. (1994). Conflict networks and the origins of women’s liberation. In E. Larana, H. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—Our social skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the 3rd-person effect of televised news coverage. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2000). Internet election news audience seeks convenience, familiar names. Retrieved August 20, 2005, from http://people-press.org/reports/display.