Marine Corps Leadership Analysis
Power, control, speed, accuracy; infantry and aviation, each one is an example of powerful productive tools that the Marine Corps utilizes on a daily bases. Each one by themselves are effective elements. However, with proper instruction and balance they become twice as effective when used together. An equal statement can be said about Authoritative and
Delegative styles of leadership. They both provide us with ways in which to lead our Marines. Nonetheless, each one has many flaws that require a significant amount of effort to function properly. Effort that could be more useful in accomplishing the mission at hand. This is why, a proper balance of the two leadership styles is the most effective way for mission accomplishment and more …show more content…
However, we all know it is much or effective if a sail and rudder were used to control the vessel. The Delegating or Laissez-Fair style has similar characteristics. A leader will let the junior leaders decide how tasks are to be accomplished. This can be problematic when there are a wide range of opinions, and no clear way of reaching a final decision. In spite of this, delegating authority to our subordinates does serve a purpose. Putting the challenge of decision making on a subordinate, allows him or her to gain experience in problem solving. As a result, it develops their leadership traits and confidence. Furthermore, it permits commanders to focus on bigger issues that influence the mission or unit. Unfortunately, some commanders will allow the junior leadership to control too much. The end result being young
Marines get confused and overwhelmed about what needs to be accomplished. Sadly, it can also cause a lack of discipline in a unit, just like a ship without a sail and rudder. Most often, the delegating style of leadership, works for units in which the individuals are very experienced and skilled
Delegative styles of leadership. They both provide us with ways in which to lead our Marines. Nonetheless, each one has many flaws that require a significant amount of effort to function properly. Effort that could be more useful in accomplishing the mission at hand. This is why, a proper balance of the two leadership styles is the most effective way for mission accomplishment and more …show more content…
However, we all know it is much or effective if a sail and rudder were used to control the vessel. The Delegating or Laissez-Fair style has similar characteristics. A leader will let the junior leaders decide how tasks are to be accomplished. This can be problematic when there are a wide range of opinions, and no clear way of reaching a final decision. In spite of this, delegating authority to our subordinates does serve a purpose. Putting the challenge of decision making on a subordinate, allows him or her to gain experience in problem solving. As a result, it develops their leadership traits and confidence. Furthermore, it permits commanders to focus on bigger issues that influence the mission or unit. Unfortunately, some commanders will allow the junior leadership to control too much. The end result being young
Marines get confused and overwhelmed about what needs to be accomplished. Sadly, it can also cause a lack of discipline in a unit, just like a ship without a sail and rudder. Most often, the delegating style of leadership, works for units in which the individuals are very experienced and skilled