Preview

March To The Sea Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
84 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
March To The Sea Argument
I agree with your statements of the March to the Sea. However, Sherman knew that the Confederacy got their strength from the moral support of the southerners. So, in that ensure destroying them will destroy the Confederacy. Also, the soldiers could burn Barnes and wrecked bridges before the army could reach them. Furthermore, Sherman’s and his troops made it hard for the Conference to fight back. Additionally, agree with you without what Sherman did slavery would’ve probably carry on a little longer, good post.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    his 14

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Evaluate this statement: "The South did not lose the Civil War; the North won the conflict." Your answer should discuss the different war strategies of the two sides, the political and military leadership of North and South, and ways in which both sides conducted the war from 1863 to 1865. It should also discuss political, social, and economic homefront issues that may have influenced the outcome of the war.…

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This event definitely helped the Union win the Civil War. The Union pushing the Confederate back later helped General William Tecumseh Sherman. This event helped William Tecumseh Sherman by pushing confederates out of the way so he could get to Atlanta. If the Union failed to win this battle, then William Tecumseh Sherman may not…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This first entry into the book showcases the side of the southern Confederate armies, who were comparing the Civil War to the Revolutionary War. They saw their enemies, the Northern Yankees, as nothing more than tyrants trying to oppress the south. Just as the British had done to the colonists a century and a half ago. This gave them a "holy cause of southern freedom", a reason to step into the shoes of their famed forefathers and once again fight for their liberties and constitutional rights.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Why does Lincoln in the “House Divided” speech believe the pro-slavery side was winning regarding the expansion of slavery in the territories? Why does Calhoun in opposing the Compromise of 1850 think the South was at a disadvantage? Because starting the new year of 1854 found slavery excluded from more than half the States by State Constitutions, and from most of the National territory by Congressional prohibition. Four days later, commenced the struggle which ended in repealing that Congressional prohibition. This opened all the National territory to slavery, and was the first point gained…… Although each side received benefits, the north seemed to gain the most. The North had absolute control over the government. The South…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Great post this week, I really enjoyed it. I like your comment “McClellan was what seems to me as a Trojan Horse.” You are absolutely right. It makes me wonder why Lincoln selected him as the commander of the Union forces. McClellan was a passive leader and wasn’t a good tactician. What would have happened if Lee would have accepted Lincoln’s offer to command the Union forces? I believe it would have been a completely different war because Lee was aggressive and took the fight to the Union. If Lee would have commanded the Union that would have left commanding the South Jeb Stewart or Jackson, either one would have possibly made the war longer and more causalities. Thanks for you post this week!…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After securing Atlanta for the Union General Sherman had orders to destroy Confederate General Hood’s army, “Sherman left a corps to hold Atlanta and pursued Hood with the rest of his army” (McPherson 808). Eventually Sherman got tired of chasing Hood and wanted to “ignore Hood and march through the heart of Georgia to the coast” (McPherson 808). “I could cut a swath through to the sea, he assured Grant, divide the Confederacy in two, and come up on…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are constant debates on why did the South lose the Civil War. The Civil War ended 150 years ago but that has not affected historians to question the outcome of the war for the Confederacy. According to Gary Gallagher, many historians work backward starting from Appomattox to explain the failure of the war. He continues by stating that those historians claim the reasoning for the failure was caused by the lack will to win the war by the Confederates. Gary Gallagher disagrees with these methods historians use. Gary Gallagher believes that the best way to understand why the Confederates lost the Civil War takes a different approach. This is Gary W. Gallagher’s thesis in his The Confederate War is “Why did so many Confederates fight for so long? Until this question receives the detailed attention long accorded the first, the history of the Confederacy will remain imperfectly understood” (17).…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our great army of the Confederacy will keep on fighting for the independence of our nation and stop Grant's army. Our leaders believe he is the Union's greatest commander. We are still holding out hope of defeating Grant. Our army held out for nine months before that against Grant’s army, but our army could not hold out against the continual attacks from Grant.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is a common belief among many historians that history is told through the eyes of the winners. Read any American history book or any world history textbook and they mainly tell you about the hero that saved the nation such as Wellington at Waterloo or General Washington in the Revolutionary War or General Patton in World War II. The case of the American Civil War is no different, especially for a man who changed the war. Ask anybody in the south, even the kindergartners and they will tell you about William Tecumseh Sherman, the man who burned everything. Ask anyone in the North and they’ll tell you how Sherman and Grant together helped the North win the war. General William Tecumseh Sherman constantly said that he disliked war yet when his time came in the Civil War he rose up from a man who was dubbed crazy to become a man who changed war into a concept of total war and would go on to become one of…

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many plus sides to the Civil War. Those plus sides were the abolishment of slavery, secession was refuted, and there was supremacy of national government. Yet, there was one difficulty which was that the Union had the challenge of figuring out what to do with free slaves. In 1867, Congress took control of Reconstruction to establish and protect citizenship rights. Congress had succeeded in many ways like having the Southern states ratify the Fourteenth Amendment to rid the military forces. But, by 1877 the Reconstruction had ended, all the work done failed, and everything reversed. Congress’ Reconstruction efforts to have equal rights for freedmen failed because the Ku Klux Klan intervened in wrong ways, freedmen were convinced to stop their actions, and editorial advocating was used as propaganda against freedmen.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sherman’s attitude to the Confederate forces was a key aspect in the result of a Union Victory. Sherman admired the Southern forces and wrote in a letter to his wife in 1864, describing the Confederate forces. “The devils seem to have a determination that cannot but be admired. No amount of poverty or adversity seems to shake their faith.” Sherman’s view on the Southern spirit would play a significant role in the way Sherman attempted to overcome these forces. Sherman’s subsequent actions after his letter to his wife accentuated his belief that severe measures were necessary to break the dogged Confederate resistance.…

    • 670 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His letter was to petition to put an end to the validity of war, by removing all inhabitants Atlanta. Promoting that peace needed to play a role in not only Georgia, but America itself. To ensure this, he says “we must stop the war that now desolates our once happy and favored country”. General’s idea to put an end to the war was to triumph over the rebel armies. The rebels set out against the laws and Constitution, which all must respect and obey. In order to defeat their army, we are to prepare the way to reach them. In their recesses, provided with the arms and instruments which will help us to accomplish our purpose. (Sherman’s letter.) Unfortunately there was no room for the people of Atlanta to reside, as the war went on due to homes and buildings which were going to get destroyed during this process. Peace cannot take place in a country filled with division. This division just as said by Sherman will only get worse if the problem is not put to an…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine a world where belligerent Islamic fundamentalists were trying to take away the lively hood of every Christian American. Even worse than that, trying to seize the world into becoming an Islamic terrorist who would die if they went against the Islamic faith. In The Last Patriot, Scot Harvath and Tracy save Anthony Nichols from a car bombing and then from a shooting inside a hotel where the two of them are interrogating him. All three of them are on the hunt for the Don Quixote book to get the information they need to find the missing revelation of Muhammad from the Islamic book, the Koran. Finding this information will ultimately lead to the termination of Fundamentalist Islamic terrorists trying to take over the world with Islam. While…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays