Preview

The 1864 General Grant's Total War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
634 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The 1864 General Grant's Total War
In 1864 General Grant had devised a plan of a Total War strategy. This was to be the straw that broke the rebel camel’s back. For General Sherman’s part he was to cut a path from Atlanta to Savanah and then move into South Carolina. Total War would mean destroying anything of military value after taking what was needed to supply the Union army. After securing Atlanta for the Union General Sherman had orders to destroy Confederate General Hood’s army, “Sherman left a corps to hold Atlanta and pursued Hood with the rest of his army” (McPherson 808). Eventually Sherman got tired of chasing Hood and wanted to “ignore Hood and march through the heart of Georgia to the coast” (McPherson 808). “I could cut a swath through to the sea, he assured Grant, divide the Confederacy in two, and come up on …show more content…
South Carolina took the brunt of the Total War philosophy, “Destroyed it was, through a corridor from south to north narrower than in Georgia but more intensely pillaged and burned” (McPherson 826). Grant’s Total War policy seemed to be working, with the Confederate war machine losing its ability to wage war more and more each day. By the time Sherman got through South Carolina Lee’s army was the only one left of any size or ability to react to the Union onslaught. When I think of Grant’s Total War philosophy, I am reminded of the many stories that came out during Viet Nam. The US used a scorched earth campaign in Viet Nam not unlike Grant’s total war. The US fire bombed large parts of the jungle and used defoliant agents to try and get rid of a major strategic benefit, the jungle itself, which the enemy used with great
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion
    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of William Tecumseh Sherman's March To The Sea War
    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of William Tecumseh Sherman's March To The Sea War

    Sherman’s crusade from Atlanta to Savannah undoubtedly contributed to the Union’s victory in the Civil War, and also had an impact on relations between the North and South. Sherman’s use of total war devastated Northern relationships with the South, making reconciliation between both sides difficult in the Reconstruction Era. Many civilians believed that Northerners were barbarians and maintained an expansive detestation for Sherman that has been passed down from generations to generations.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.
    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    General Sherman's Tactics
    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page

    General Sherman's Tactics

    After reviewing the photographs of the tactics use by General Sherman throughout the Civil War, I have come to the conclusion that nowadays his approach can be seen as excessive and immoral; however, during a time of war, such tactics might have been necessary to culminate the conflict. Moreover, in my opinion, General Sherman conviction to end the war led him to employ a technique known as the “scorched earth tactics;” such strategy can be utilized to break the enemy’s economy and wage psychological warfare on the enemy’s population. By widespread of destruction of civilian infrastructure left behind by General Sherman and the consumption of supplies in South Carolina and Georgia was an effort to stop, demoralize and deplete the Confederate…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Henry Grady's 'The New South'
    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Henry Grady's 'The New South'

    As the Civil War came to an end, the South experienced an era of changes. One of the most popular speeches, explaining how the post-war South had grown out of its old customs and made progress, was Henry Grady’s The New South. This document is an important historical speech when comparing examinations of how life was for Southerners in the years following the Reconstruction and the Compromise of 1877. Although this speech is very motivational, it differs from the reality of how the South was managing during this time period. Grady’s vision seemed almost too good to be true when covering the stance of the economy, the termination of slavery, and the attitudes of Confederate soldiers after the war.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Scorched Earth Phenomenon
    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Scorched Earth Phenomenon

    proposed using the “scorched earth” tactic, which was to destroy all resources in front of him to prevent him from using them. The intended effect would be to starve Sherman and his Army. However, because the Confederates did not know where he was going, they were unable to get in front of him. The scorched earth tactic was abandoned as the Confederates realized they could not destroy the entire south. Sherman was essentially, left unchallenged.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sherman Letters to the Generals
    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sherman Letters to the Generals

    In Memoirs of General William T. Sherman, it reveals Sherman letters to the Union generals. Sherman letter to General Ulysses S. Grant, commander in chief of all Union forces in the Civil War, he discusses his belief about the size of armies and how that plays into of the nature modern warfare. “We ought to ask our country for the largest possible armies that can be raised...” (McFeely 114). Sherman feels it is important thing as the self- existence of a great nation should not chance war (114). He believes the bigger the army the better. The letter to General John Bell Hood, commander of Confederate Army of Tennessee, discusses their wrangle over the city of Atlanta. Sherman has deemed that citizens now residing in Atlanta should remove. Since Sherman believes that Atlanta is no place for families and his real reasons are they want all houses of Atlanta for military storage and occupation and to contract the lines of defense. Because of these reasons he is providing food and transportation for further north and transportation by cars for Rough and Ready. Sherman letter to General Hood is hoping this proposition of his meets Hood views. Hood response to Sherman letter was he does not consider that he has any alternative in this matter. He describes Sherman removing proposal as “the “unprecedented” measures transcends, in studied and ingenious cruelty, all acts ever before brought to my attention in the dark history of war” (119). Sherman justifies his “unprecedented” measures by referring to General Johnston whom very wise and properly removed the families all the way from Dalton down. Sherman also feels it was unnecessary to appeal to the dark history, when recant and modern examples are so handy. Sherman feels he has not once judged General Hood for his cruelty, so why is his proposal a major concern. “I ask you not to appeal to a just God in such a sacrilegious manner: You who, in the midst of peace and prosperity, have plunged a…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Is William Tecumseh Sherman's Legacy
    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages

    What Is William Tecumseh Sherman's Legacy

    It is a common belief among many historians that history is told through the eyes of the winners. Read any American history book or any world history textbook and they mainly tell you about the hero that saved the nation such as Wellington at Waterloo or General Washington in the Revolutionary War or General Patton in World War II. The case of the American Civil War is no different, especially for a man who changed the war. Ask anybody in the south, even the kindergartners and they will tell you about William Tecumseh Sherman, the man who burned everything. Ask anyone in the North and they’ll tell you how Sherman and Grant together helped the North win the war. General William Tecumseh Sherman constantly said that he disliked war yet when his time came in the Civil War he rose up from a man who was dubbed crazy to become a man who changed war into a concept of total war and would go on to become one of…

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    General Sherman's role in the Civil War
    • 670 Words
    • 2 Pages

    General Sherman's role in the Civil War

    William Tecumseh Sherman was an American soldier, businessman, educator and author. He served as a General in the Union Army during the American Civil War. He was a renowned general and received commendation for his outstanding command of military strategy, as well as being criticised for his harshness of the “scorched earth” policies that he implemented in conducting total war against the South. Sherman’s attitude to war and his implementation of the strategy of total war were vital in the defeat of the Confederacy.…

    • 670 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Grant and Lee
    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Grant and Lee

    Throughout the course of my history career, which is not very long, teachers and professors have always focused on the point that General Grant was a butchering alcoholic who won the war solely on the account of his stubborn personality. And on the other hand, teachers portrayed General Lee as a masterful strategist, who used Christian values in order to win the rebellion. However, in Fuller's account of the two Generals, he alleges through data and personal intuition that General Grant was actually a strategist and mastermind that not only won the war but also, lost fewer soldiers.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Sherman's Letter To Atlanta
    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What Is Sherman's Letter To Atlanta

    His letter was to petition to put an end to the validity of war, by removing all inhabitants Atlanta. Promoting that peace needed to play a role in not only Georgia, but America itself. To ensure this, he says “we must stop the war that now desolates our once happy and favored country”. General’s idea to put an end to the war was to triumph over the rebel armies. The rebels set out against the laws and Constitution, which all must respect and obey. In order to defeat their army, we are to prepare the way to reach them. In their recesses, provided with the arms and instruments which will help us to accomplish our purpose. (Sherman’s letter.) Unfortunately there was no room for the people of Atlanta to reside, as the war went on due to homes and buildings which were going to get destroyed during this process. Peace cannot take place in a country filled with division. This division just as said by Sherman will only get worse if the problem is not put to an…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why the South Lost the Civil War
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why the South Lost the Civil War

    When the Confederate Army General Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union Army General, Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865, many considered the Civil War to be over. The fact that the North was victorious over the South was accepted and the process of reconstruction began in America. It was never openly discussed on why the North defeated the South. However, the question began to slowly arise over time on why the South lost the Civil War. Many historians have become interested in this question and many reasons have been given on why the South lost the Civil War. Lack of manpower, shortages of supplies, and inferior leadership and government were the three main reasons on why the South was defeated in the Civil War.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    March To The Sea Argument
    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page

    March To The Sea Argument

    I agree with your statements of the March to the Sea. However, Sherman knew that the Confederacy got their strength from the moral support of the southerners. So, in that ensure destroying them will destroy the Confederacy. Also, the soldiers could burn Barnes and wrecked bridges before the army could reach them. Furthermore, Sherman’s and his troops made it hard for the Conference to fight back. Additionally, agree with you without what Sherman did slavery would’ve probably carry on a little longer, good post.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Confederate Win The Civil War Essay
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did The Confederate Win The Civil War Essay

    The United States Civil War was a challenging time for the American people. Numerous factors led the Southern states to secede from the United States and form the Confederate States of America. More than a century after Robert E. Lee surrendered his soldiers to the Union, people continue to argue about how the Confederacy was defeated. In the past thirty years, historians have examined the most popular believed explanations for Southern demise (Beringer). Of course, there is no established belief to why the Confederacy lost, but by studying previous wars, these historians have speculated the most rational reasons behind the CSA’s defeat.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Total War?
    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil War Total War?

    The definition of total war is when one side mobilizes all available resources in order to destroy another side¡¯s ability to engage in war. The Civil War was a total war because both Union and Confederate Generals like William Sherman, Philip Sheridan, and Robert E. Lee used total war tactics against each other when the other side hinted weakness. They used these tactics to try and put an end to the war. The Civil War was a total war because both sides used tactics that were defined by the Powell Doctrine as total war. These tactics was to unite the hearts and minds of the people, go in with overwhelming force, and have a clear, exit strategy.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More