Preview

Mandatory Sentencing Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
102 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mandatory Sentencing Research Paper
I do think that the mandatory sentencing is one approach to solving the drug problem, but I do not think that it is the only one. It is clear that the sentencing works to a certain extent, but is not the right choice for every situation. Personally, I feel like this is a gray area due to the fact that mandatory sentencing gives definitive discipline to someone who broke the law. Where in specific cases that approach is too strict. Although I do not have a direct answer to solve this problem, I think that different variables should play into the sentencing.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The war on drugs did not officially take off until the 1980s with president Ronald Reagan. He coined the term “war on drugs”, created the Drug Enforcement Agency, and enacted a court procedure that the country is still feeling the effects of to this day: mandatory minimum sentencing. Mandatory minimum sentencing is a procedure in which a judge must sentence a citizen convicted to a minimum amount of years in prison for a crime regardless of circumstance. Because of this, the amount of prisoners in federal prison has skyrocketed from “only about 25,000” inmates in the 80s to “more than 215,000” as of 2014 (Miles). As a direct result of minimum sentencing, according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, at least 50% of those incarcerated were convicted on non-violent drug charges. Of those 50%, 27% were convicted for possession of marijuana. This did not stop or discourage drug dealers. What this did was force prisons to begin placing “two or three bunks in a cell, and converting television rooms and open bays into sleeping quarters” (Miles). What this did was waste time and tax dollars to incarcerate non-violent marijuana dealers. What hat this did was send people like Weldon Angelos to jail on a 55 year sentence for just three marijuana sales. A twenty four year old Weldon was sentenced to jail in 2002 after being caught by an undercover cop. His three drug sales were tried as their own separate offences causing the 55 years in prison. Paul Cassell, the judge who made the decision admitted that “that wasn’t the right thing to do” (ABC). It costs roughly $31,000 to keep someone in jail for a year, so why are we spending so much of our money to keep those on marijuana charges locked up for a drug that’s only hard evidence against it is possible complications with short term memory? It is not worth the money to keep these people in prison. If legalization were to happen at the federal level we…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Describe recent trends in terms of the inmate population, commission of violent crimes, and length of sentence. Recent trends in terms of inmate population has Hispanics increasing in prison, the commission of violent crimes are actually down since 1970s, but the length of sentence is longer because of the tough on crime mentality.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentences are another method that was designed to limit judicial discretion while maintaining a “get tough on crime” approach. Mandatory sentences are sentences where all people convicted of certain crimes will be punished equally with a set minimum prison term. I believe the intentions were good when these reforms went into place. I think the intended purpose was to get tough on crime, eliminate bias on the part of the judge, to make criminals think twice about breaking the law, and provide equal punishment to all criminals who commit the same crimes. Unfortunately these sentence guidelines do not allow a judge to take into consideration the first time offender, differentiate the deviance level of the offender, and it does not allow for the judge to tailor a punishment to each individual case. The “drug war” they were trying to control with these sentences has had a backfire effect. The drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences; it is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentences have been called both America’s strongest tool and one of its greatest injustices, but here are the facts. Mandatory sentencing laws dictate that when a set amount of narcotics (for example one gram of LSD or 100 grams of heroin) is present the judge is required to sentence no lower than the set minimum (in this case it would be five years). This differs from other criminal cases in that…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following paragraphs will define and explain the differences between determinate and indeterminate sentences. This discussion may seem, at first blush, to be somewhat theoretical. However, the issue is a life-altering one for parole as an institution. In a determinate sentencing structure, there is no role for a paroling authority in making release decisions.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a Criminologist Advisor to the State Legislature, I have been chosen to provide a prison term policy on armed robbery. Currently the legislature will soon be voting on a bill that would double the maximum prison term for anyone convicted of armed robbery. First I would like to define what the legal definition of armed robbery is as defined by the Black's Law Dictionary which is: an aggravated form of robbery in which the defendant is armed with a dangerous weapon, though it is not necessary to prove that he used the weapon to effectuate the robbery. The taking of property from person or presence of another by use of force or by threatening use of force while armed with a dangerous weapon (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition).…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most dramatic developments in the Criminal Justice system during the late 20th Century were the revolution of the sentencing system. Prior to the sentencing reforms of 1984, most of the 20th century federal sentencing was largely based on rehabilitative model where sentencing was indeterminate. By the 1970s, the traditional sentencing system came under increasing attack as public interest in the criminal justice system prompted “crime research boom time” (Nagel, 1990; Wilkins, 1987). The concerns manifested to a policy reform focusing on retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as means of getting tough on crime and.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not believe that the ends justify the means when it comes to mandatory minimum sentencing for drug offenses. The reason for enacting these laws was to try and deter crime, but research has shown that harsher punishments does not lead to a decrease in crime rates. Incarcerating people for drug offenses is not an effective way to combat drug crimes. The space in prisons, and funds used to fight drug crimes should both be focused more on violent…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If I were a legislature and wanted to propose laws that would abolish the mandatory minimum sentencing, I would focus on evidence that suggests these statutes are the root cause for overcrowding and financial burdens to government budgets (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). Because every state in the union has been affected by mandatory minimum sentencing, I would also capitalize on the trends of other states releasing prisoners’ early and abolishing similar sentencing laws (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.).…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many different argument both for and against mandatory minimum drug sentencing. However there are more arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing then there are for the support of the mandatory sentencing. One of the biggest arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing is that it was originally intended to target the higher level drug dealers but the majority of the cases have only been low level drug dealers. One of the other arguments is that will cause the jail systems to become overcrowded and that if is unfair.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For example, mandatory sentencing usually is imposed on offenders with drug and weapons charges and do not allow parole, but credit for good time. Unfortunately, expressed by several judges, they dislike the idea of having the sentencing guidelines.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The last stage of a criminal trial is known as sentencing. During sentencing the convening authority over the criminal court proceedings makes a determination of how the guilty party should be punished. Prior to that determination being made both the defense attorneys and prosecutors may make their arguments as to why or why not the defendant should be punished to the fullest of the law. The judge taking these arguments into consideration makes his or her decision on what type sentence to hand down. While the main goal is to punish those that are found guilty there are five sentencing rationales in use in the American criminal justice system. These rationales are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, restoration, and incapacitation. In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the judge will use the rationales of rehabilitation and incapacitation. The defense and prosecutors will make their arguments and propose the type of sentence Mr. Dents should receive which in turn will protect him and society.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, Mandatory Minimum sentencing should be abolished but the nonviolent drug offenses should still be taken to court. The Mandatory Minimum sentencing has some decent intentions but there needs to be some type of change or beneficial results in order for it to be effective. It weighs more bad rather than good, which justifies that America needs to expunge this system, so as to where America can be an eminent…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory Sentencing

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page

    In the PowerPoint, you talk about removing mandatory sentences, and for my understanding was if the crimes are committed before the mandatory sentences come in place this can be one of the expectations of not implement the mandatory sentence. The judge can have some discretion to adjust some guideline of sentencing and left the parole to decide if he can be released.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The inmate prison population of the BOP increased over the past few years due to federal sentencing of drug offenses and immigration. Changes in sentencing policies have increased the mandatory minimum sentencing as well as changes in the federal criminal code in which it increased the amount of crimes seen as federal offenses, also the repeal of parole. Since these changes certain crimes are now deemed as federal offenses, which require a longer period of prison time. War on drugs has cause an increase in the prison populations due to high level of harsh prison sentencing’s. Although the attempts at the three strikes system was an effort in decreasing the prison population it did not work. Focus needs to be placed on rehabilitation of inmates…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays