Preview

Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing
Argument against mandatory minimum drug sentencing

There are many different argument both for and against mandatory minimum drug sentencing. However there are more arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing then there are for the support of the mandatory sentencing. One of the biggest arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing is that it was originally intended to target the higher level drug dealers but the majority of the cases have only been low level drug dealers. One of the other arguments is that will cause the jail systems to become overcrowded and that if is unfair. The reason these laws were designed were to try to put an end to and capture more high level drug lords. The argument that many people are
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentences
    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    Clearly there are several issues of Mandatory Minimum sentences. Moreover, there is evidence that says it decreases drug possession and violence, federal judges can argue otherwise. Often, innocent people go to jail for harmless acts for an unreasonable amount of time in jail, for a one time use or a non-violent act of drug use. If federal court systems continue laws of Mandatory Minimum sentences, they need to question and use evidence to support whether the individual is really guilty or innocent.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences
    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    Mandatory minimum sentences are another method that was designed to limit judicial discretion while maintaining a “get tough on crime” approach. Mandatory sentences are sentences where all people convicted of certain crimes will be punished equally with a set minimum prison term. I believe the intentions were good when these reforms went into place. I think the intended purpose was to get tough on crime, eliminate bias on the part of the judge, to make criminals think twice about breaking the law, and provide equal punishment to all criminals who commit the same crimes. Unfortunately these sentence guidelines do not allow a judge to take into consideration the first time offender, differentiate the deviance level of the offender, and it does not allow for the judge to tailor a punishment to each individual case. The “drug war” they were trying to control with these sentences has had a backfire effect. The drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences; it is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pros And Cons
    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pros And Cons

    Mandatory minimum sentences have been called both America’s strongest tool and one of its greatest injustices, but here are the facts. Mandatory sentencing laws dictate that when a set amount of narcotics (for example one gram of LSD or 100 grams of heroin) is present the judge is required to sentence no lower than the set minimum (in this case it would be five years). This differs from other criminal cases in that…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimums
    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimums

    The biggest complaint about mandatory minimum sentences is that they are unfair. A judge does not have the authority to tailor the sentence to the specific facts. Therefore, someone who was an unimportant part of a drug conspiracy might be stuck with the same minimum sentence as someone who was the ringleader behind the crime. Mandatory sentencing laws also do not allow plea bargains, so even if the prosecutor…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory Sentencing Research Paper
    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page

    Mandatory Sentencing Research Paper

    I do think that the mandatory sentencing is one approach to solving the drug problem, but I do not think that it is the only one. It is clear that the sentencing works to a certain extent, but is not the right choice for every situation. Personally, I feel like this is a gray area due to the fact that mandatory sentencing gives definitive discipline to someone who broke the law. Where in specific cases that approach is too strict. Although I do not have a direct answer to solve this problem, I think that different variables should play into the sentencing.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    I do not believe that the ends justify the means when it comes to mandatory minimum sentencing for drug offenses. The reason for enacting these laws was to try and deter crime, but research has shown that harsher punishments does not lead to a decrease in crime rates. Incarcerating people for drug offenses is not an effective way to combat drug crimes. The space in prisons, and funds used to fight drug crimes should both be focused more on violent…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Against Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page

    Case Against Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    If I were a legislature and wanted to propose laws that would abolish the mandatory minimum sentencing, I would focus on evidence that suggests these statutes are the root cause for overcrowding and financial burdens to government budgets (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). Because every state in the union has been affected by mandatory minimum sentencing, I would also capitalize on the trends of other states releasing prisoners’ early and abolishing similar sentencing laws (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.).…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing
    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing

    For example, mandatory sentencing usually is imposed on offenders with drug and weapons charges and do not allow parole, but credit for good time. Unfortunately, expressed by several judges, they dislike the idea of having the sentencing guidelines.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal
    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing Proposal

    The last stage of a criminal trial is known as sentencing. During sentencing the convening authority over the criminal court proceedings makes a determination of how the guilty party should be punished. Prior to that determination being made both the defense attorneys and prosecutors may make their arguments as to why or why not the defendant should be punished to the fullest of the law. The judge taking these arguments into consideration makes his or her decision on what type sentence to hand down. While the main goal is to punish those that are found guilty there are five sentencing rationales in use in the American criminal justice system. These rationales are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, restoration, and incapacitation. In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the judge will use the rationales of rehabilitation and incapacitation. The defense and prosecutors will make their arguments and propose the type of sentence Mr. Dents should receive which in turn will protect him and society.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fair Sentencing Act Pros And Cons
    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fair Sentencing Act Pros And Cons

    The Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) of 2010 (Public Law 111-220) was an act by Congress, and became law on August 3, 2010 ( ). The FSA intent is to reduce the gap between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to initiate federal criminal penalties from a 100:1 weight ratio to an 18:1 weight ratio. The FSA also eliminates the five-year mandatory minimum sentence for the possession of crack cocaine (Reid 2012).…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Incarceration
    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Incarceration

    Since 2002, the United States has had the highest incarceration rate in the world. Although prison populations are increasing in some parts of the world, the natural rate of incarceration for countries comparable to the United States tends to stay around 100 prisoners per 100,000 population. The U.S. rate is 500 prisoners per 100,000 residents, or about 1.6 million prisoners in 2010, according to the latest available data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). Prison is a place used for internment of convicted criminals. Not including the death penalty, a sentence to prison is the harshest punishment inflicted on criminals in the United States. On the federal level, imprisonment or incarceration is managed by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, a federal…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing
    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing

    Mandatory Minimum sentencing usually is defined when a judge is determined to deliver a fixed amount of years in prison to an individual for a convicted crime. Most mandatory minimum sentences apply to drug offenses but it also applies to other crimes, like having an unlicensed gun, fraud, and many others. Mandatory Minimum legislature contributes to the truth that America has a systematic problem in the increase of mass incarceration and men of color are being deprived of their natural rights. The mandatory minimum sentence doesn’t resolve the dilemma of crime. American nonviolent drug offenses should be prosecuted, but Mandatory Minimum sentencing should be eradicated.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory Sentencing
    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page

    Mandatory Sentencing

    In the PowerPoint, you talk about removing mandatory sentences, and for my understanding was if the crimes are committed before the mandatory sentences come in place this can be one of the expectations of not implement the mandatory sentence. The judge can have some discretion to adjust some guideline of sentencing and left the parole to decide if he can be released.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Against Decriminalization Of Drugs
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Against Decriminalization Of Drugs

    348). Not arresting (and charging) individuals, and instead having them attend rehab facilities will help increase the chance that these men and women will help prevent drug abuse. When someone is arrested, and sent to jail for the possession of drugs, most individuals will continue their lives just as they were before. Programs and policies specifically designed for the rehabilitation of those individuals who are caught with the possession of drugs need to be implemented in law enforcement agencies. On the condition that drug use and possession is not criminalized, I do not believe there is any violation in the moral rights of individuals, if drug production and sale is illegal. As de Marneffe states, there will still be ways for people to obtain drugs.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Mandatory Sentencing
    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Mandatory Sentencing

    According to Evan Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr.(2014), “mandatory sentencing was passed in the 1980s, by U.S. Congress and many state representing two bodies with yearnings that it will the settled jail terms to those arraigned particular infringement, much of the time drug offense”. Rather, this cruel sentencing adversely, packing the penitentiaries with low-level transgressors at a higher cost to taxpayers. As indicated by Paul Larkin and Evan Bernick (2014), “mandatory minimum sentences have not eliminated sentencing disparities because they have not eliminated sentencing discretion; they have merely shifted…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics