Preview

Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
201 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mandatory Minimum Sentences
Mandatory minimum sentences are imposed by statutory law and are based on specific types of crime (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). All fifty states participated in these sentences by the mid 90’s (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.). Studies have shown these sentences were effective in the beginning, but long-term results showed they did not have a significant deterrence on crime (Schmalleger & Smykla, n.d.).

I believe mandatory sentences could be effective if the correctional system was expanded to accommodate the increase of prisoners. From what I have learned so far, the political climate of the country has a lot to do with sentencing laws. It can be a rollercoaster of tough on crime methods to programs designed to lessen punishment. Mandatory
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Essay On Mandatory Minimums
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Mandatory Minimums

    Think about that.” Mandatory minimums are an outdated, destructive policy that the U.S. never has, and never will need. In order to reform our criminal justice system, and ensure that the people who go to prison are there for a time that’s proportional to the crime they commit, we must get rid of mandatory minimums. Aside from the harm they cause to the prisoner, law-abiding American taxpayers are burdened by the unnecessary cost of keeping people in prisons for much longer than is needed. Of course, mandatory minimums are far from the only problem within the U.S. criminal justice system, however, abolishing these ridiculous laws will help thousands of current American prisoners, as well as innumerable future offenders. Overall, mandatory minimum sentencing policy must be ended in the near future, should America hold true to its values of “freedom and justice for…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    Another contrast between cigarettes and cannabis, is that cannabis has medicinal properties. The most common use for marijuana in medicine is to diminish the effects of chemotherapy on cancer patients. The two most familiar components of marijuana to the medical industry is tetrahydrocannabinol or THC and cannabidiol or CBD. Both THC and CBD are noted in the US Patent # 6630507 as having antioxidant properties and being useful in treatment of side effects “caused by oxidative stress” such as chemotherapy (Hampson). Chemotherapy is the method of treating cancer in which you kill or stunt the growth of cells, in order to eliminate the cancerous ones. The possible side effects include headaches, pain from nerve damage, nausea, and vomiting. THC…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ernest J. Gaines A Lesson Before Dying
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ernest J. Gaines A Lesson Before Dying

    Ron Fridell states, "The basic principles of deterrence are that punishments are necessary to deter crime and encourage law abiding behavior. Punishment must also fit the crime with more serious crimes requiring more serious punishments. (61) I agree with the author because capital punishment serves as a device to discourage certain forms of behavior by making the consequences of these actions unpleasant. Capital punishment is acceptable under those terms and it is necessity to the betterment of society. Micheal Kronwetter said, "No other punishment deters men so effectively…as the punishment of death."(19) As an example, murder peaked in 1990 with 2,200 deaths, when New York did not have the death penalty. In 1997, when capital punishment was reinstated the murders for the year totaled 767. Deterrence obviously worked in relation to these crimes. There seems to be a direct relationship between deterrence and the effects of capital…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences
    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences

    Mandatory minimum sentences are another method that was designed to limit judicial discretion while maintaining a “get tough on crime” approach. Mandatory sentences are sentences where all people convicted of certain crimes will be punished equally with a set minimum prison term. I believe the intentions were good when these reforms went into place. I think the intended purpose was to get tough on crime, eliminate bias on the part of the judge, to make criminals think twice about breaking the law, and provide equal punishment to all criminals who commit the same crimes. Unfortunately these sentence guidelines do not allow a judge to take into consideration the first time offender, differentiate the deviance level of the offender, and it does not allow for the judge to tailor a punishment to each individual case. The “drug war” they were trying to control with these sentences has had a backfire effect. The drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences; it is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pros And Cons
    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pros And Cons

    Those in support of MMS state that they keep the justice system fair and safe from radical judges and juries who’s views on sentencing will vary greatly for each individual; therefore, actually preventing disparities. MMS are a powerful deterrent that prosecutors can use against the accused to get plea bargains and information on those higher in the drug organizations; however, those opposed say that MMS cases have no advantage when it comes to cooperation rates because most who are arrested are low level offenders who are not affiliated or know little about the organization (Mandatory Minimum sentencing 1). This means it is usually those who are higher up the chain- those who are doing the more serious crimes- that end up getting their sentences cut…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Sentencing
    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Sentencing

    Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Understanding Incarceration Disparities: Stage-Level Analysis
    • 3561 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Understanding Incarceration Disparities: Stage-Level Analysis

    On August 8th, 2013 United States Attorney General Eric Holder made history when he announced the nearing end of the mandatory minimum-era in federal sentencing policy in his speech to the American Bar Association in San Francisco. In his address Holder lamented the condition of the Federal Justice System, expressing concern over astronomical incarceration rates, lack of inmate rehabilitation, and discouraging recidivism rates. It was racial disparities in sentencing, however, which garnered the majority of Holder’s attention.…

    • 3561 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimums
    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimums

    The biggest complaint about mandatory minimum sentences is that they are unfair. A judge does not have the authority to tailor the sentence to the specific facts. Therefore, someone who was an unimportant part of a drug conspiracy might be stuck with the same minimum sentence as someone who was the ringleader behind the crime. Mandatory sentencing laws also do not allow plea bargains, so even if the prosecutor…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing In The 20th Century
    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sentencing In The 20th Century

    The most dramatic developments in the Criminal Justice system during the late 20th Century were the revolution of the sentencing system. Prior to the sentencing reforms of 1984, most of the 20th century federal sentencing was largely based on rehabilitative model where sentencing was indeterminate. By the 1970s, the traditional sentencing system came under increasing attack as public interest in the criminal justice system prompted “crime research boom time” (Nagel, 1990; Wilkins, 1987). The concerns manifested to a policy reform focusing on retribution, deterrence and incapacitation as means of getting tough on crime and.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing
    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing

    There are many different argument both for and against mandatory minimum drug sentencing. However there are more arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing then there are for the support of the mandatory sentencing. One of the biggest arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing is that it was originally intended to target the higher level drug dealers but the majority of the cases have only been low level drug dealers. One of the other arguments is that will cause the jail systems to become overcrowded and that if is unfair.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing
    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Mandatory Sentencing

    For example, mandatory sentencing usually is imposed on offenders with drug and weapons charges and do not allow parole, but credit for good time. Unfortunately, expressed by several judges, they dislike the idea of having the sentencing guidelines.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal
    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing Proposal

    The last stage of a criminal trial is known as sentencing. During sentencing the convening authority over the criminal court proceedings makes a determination of how the guilty party should be punished. Prior to that determination being made both the defense attorneys and prosecutors may make their arguments as to why or why not the defendant should be punished to the fullest of the law. The judge taking these arguments into consideration makes his or her decision on what type sentence to hand down. While the main goal is to punish those that are found guilty there are five sentencing rationales in use in the American criminal justice system. These rationales are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, restoration, and incapacitation. In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the judge will use the rationales of rehabilitation and incapacitation. The defense and prosecutors will make their arguments and propose the type of sentence Mr. Dents should receive which in turn will protect him and society.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing
    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Mandatory Sentencing

    Mandatory Minimum sentencing usually is defined when a judge is determined to deliver a fixed amount of years in prison to an individual for a convicted crime. Most mandatory minimum sentences apply to drug offenses but it also applies to other crimes, like having an unlicensed gun, fraud, and many others. Mandatory Minimum legislature contributes to the truth that America has a systematic problem in the increase of mass incarceration and men of color are being deprived of their natural rights. The mandatory minimum sentence doesn’t resolve the dilemma of crime. American nonviolent drug offenses should be prosecuted, but Mandatory Minimum sentencing should be eradicated.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Mandatory Minimums
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Is Mandatory Minimums

    mandatory minimums as a way to keep offenders in prison for a longer period of time. However, evidence provided by the media is not entirely honest. Studies conducted by Statistics Canada have shown an extensive decline in non-violent and violent crimes over the past two decades. The Crime Severity Index (CSI) has decreased by 3% since 2013, “declining from 68.8% to 65.7%; [which was attributed] to a [decline] in robberies and breaking and entering” (Boyce, 2014, pg.3). In 2014, the Police Reported Crime Rate declined “by 3% from the previous year to 5,046 incidents per 100,000 population” (Boyce, 2014, pg.3). Since 2014, violent crimes have decreased by 5%, dropping down to 70.2% on the CSI (Boyce, 2014, pg.3). “This drop marked the eighth…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics