Level of Preference of Catering Service Sector of Monkayo, Compostela Valley Province to Multi-Level Marketing
LEVEL OF PREFERENCE OF CATERING SERVICE SECTOR IN MONKAYO, COMPOSTELLA VALLEY PROVINCE TO MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING
CHAPTER I
PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
In today’s modern world customers are the main reason of establishing different types of businesses to sustain their needs and wants. Business provides products and services to customers. This products and services in the present day world are provided by the entrepreneurs who organize, manage and assume the risk of starting businesses mainly for earning profit. Engaging in different types of business is easy but crucial because of the diverse taste and preferences of the customers. This is the reason why different business sectors implemented strategies to satisfy the needs and wants of each buyer of their products offering presented in the market.
As defined by ISO: "TQM is a management approach of an organization, centered on quality, based on the participation of all its members and aiming at long-term success through customer satisfaction, and benefits to all members of the organization and to society." TQM nowadays is the mainstream of every business, since different companies using this method to become successful one. TQM was originated from “TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE” (TPM) which was invented by Toyota Company. They solve their problems by completely changing their way as it operated its plants, they stopped their workers moving around as much and assigned their workers to have responsibility over individual machines and they also required their workers to have and keep documents regarding their machines not only on how to operate but the entire maintenance history and how it work internally. They also tackle about the dirt and they regularly started to keep apart their machines to clean them. And the last step that was taken by Toyota was the systematic preventative maintenance which part of their documentation was to study carefully any irregularity of their
CHAPTER I
PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
In today’s modern world customers are the main reason of establishing different types of businesses to sustain their needs and wants. Business provides products and services to customers. This products and services in the present day world are provided by the entrepreneurs who organize, manage and assume the risk of starting businesses mainly for earning profit. Engaging in different types of business is easy but crucial because of the diverse taste and preferences of the customers. This is the reason why different business sectors implemented strategies to satisfy the needs and wants of each buyer of their products offering presented in the market.
As defined by ISO: "TQM is a management approach of an organization, centered on quality, based on the participation of all its members and aiming at long-term success through customer satisfaction, and benefits to all members of the organization and to society." TQM nowadays is the mainstream of every business, since different companies using this method to become successful one. TQM was originated from “TOTAL PRODUCTIVE MAINTENANCE” (TPM) which was invented by Toyota Company. They solve their problems by completely changing their way as it operated its plants, they stopped their workers moving around as much and assigned their workers to have responsibility over individual machines and they also required their workers to have and keep documents regarding their machines not only on how to operate but the entire maintenance history and how it work internally. They also tackle about the dirt and they regularly started to keep apart their machines to clean them. And the last step that was taken by Toyota was the systematic preventative maintenance which part of their documentation was to study carefully any irregularity of their
Bibliography: Agus, A., S. Krishman and S. Kadir (2000), “The Structural Impact of TQM on Financial Performance Relative to Competitors through Customer Satisfaction: A Study of Malaysian Ahire, L.S., Golhar, D.Y., & Waller, M.A. (2003). Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27, 23–56. Ahmed, P.K. (2000). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30–43. Anderson, J.C., Rungtusanatham, M., & Schroeder, R.G. (2003). A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 472–509. Black, A.S., & Porter, L.J. (2005). Identification of the critical factors of TQM. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 1–21. Crosby, P.B. (1996). Quality is still free: Making quality certain in uncertain times. New York: McGraw-Hill. Dow, D., Swanson, D., & Ford, S. (1999). Exploding the myth: Do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance? Production and Operations Management, 8(1), 1–27. Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G., & Sakakibara, S. (2000). A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. Journal of Operational Management, 11, 339–366. Motwani, J. (2001). Critical factors and performance measures of TQM. The TQM Magazine, 13(4), 292–300. Powell, T. C. (2000), “Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and Empirical Study,” Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), pp. 15-37. Powell, T.C. (2001). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 15–37. Reed, R., Lemark, D.J., & Mero, N.P. (2000). Total quality management and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Quality Management, 5, 5–26. Saraph, J.V., Benson, G.P., & Schroeder, R.G. (2003). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences, 20, 810–829. Sila, I., & Ebrahimpour, M. (2002). An investigation of the total quality management survey based research published between 1989 and 2000 – a literature review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(7), 902–970. Spreitzer, G.M. (2003). Psychological empowerment in the work place: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. Steingrad, D.S., & Fitzgibbons, D.E. (2003). A postmodern deconstruction of total quality management. Journal of Organization Change Management, 6(5), 27–42. Watson, J.G., & Korukonda, A.R. (2000). The TQM jungle: A dialectical analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 12(9), 100–109. Vuppalapati, K., Ahire, S.L., & Gupta, T. (2002). JIT and TQM: A case for joint implementation. Zeitz, G., Johannesson, R., & Ritchie, J.E. Jr. (2002). An employee survey measuring total quality management practices and culture. Group and Organization Management, 22(4), 414–444. http://www.belltel.ph/info_iso.html 2004, Retrieved January 17, 2014 at 2:50 pm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amway#Business_model 2006 , Retrieved January 16, 2014 at 11:26 am). Jake 2006: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060830050834AAeJ7FX http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TQM#Origins http://johnchamberlain.com/diary/2005/di2008 Retrieved January 15, 2014 at 9:01 pm). (http://managementstudyguide.com/multi-level-marketing-history.htm, 11:55 AM, Jan. 17, 2014). http://www.profitclinic.com/MLM/whats-mlm/history.html August 24,2002 retrieved January 18, 2014 @04:14 pm). CommsoftInfotech,Monday,11June2012,http://commsoftinfotech.blogspot.com/2012/06/importance-of-multi-level-marketing.html, retrieved: 12:25 PM, Jan. 17, 2014). http://maaw.info/ArticleSummaries/ArtSumTheTippingPoint.htm