Preview

Legal Case: The Petitioner Graham Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
106 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Case: The Petitioner Graham Case
Petitioner Graham was a diabetic that asked his friend to drive him to a convenience store to purchase orange juice to counteract the onset of an insulin reaction. On scene the respondent Connor (city police officer) made an investigative stop ordering them to wait until he found out what had happened in the convenience store. The respondents backup police officers decided to handcuff Graham and ignored/ and or rebuffed attempts to explain and treat Grahams condition. This case went to trial because Graham claimed that he sustained multiple injuries from the encounter and filed a law suit against this officer for violating his fourth amendment rights.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dethorne Graham, who is a diabetic, asked a friend, William Berry, to drive him to a store to purchase some juice to neutralize the start of an insulin reaction. When Dethorne Graham entered the store, he saw the number of people that would be ahead of him, Dethorne Graham hurried out and asked William Berry to drive him to a friend's house instead. Connor, a Charlotte, North Carolina police officer, became wary after seeing Dethorne Graham quickly enter and leave the store. Officer Connor followed William Berry's car, about half a mile from the store, he made an investigative stop and ordered Dethorne Graham And William Berry to wait while he found out what had happened in the store.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Type of Action: This Criminal case in which the Maclaughlin claimed that his Fourth Amendment was violated due to the 48 hours arraignment for Probable cause.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts of the Case: The Appellant Miriam Leverington, a nurse at Memorial Hospital (Appellee 1) in Colorado Springs, was pulled over in December of 2008 by Officer Duaine Peters (Appellee 2). During the course of the stop Leverington told the police officer that she hoped he was never her patient. Officer Peters replied, "I hope not too, because maybe I'll call your supervisor and tell her you threatened me." The Police officer did in fact, within 5 days after the incident, report Leverington’s comment to Memorial Hospital. Memorial Hospital took disciplinary action against her for making the comment to the officer. They disciplined her by terminating Leverington from her job as a cardiac nurse there. Leverington sued the City (Memorial) and Officer Peters for violating her rights to free speech. Leverington claimed that the officer had been rude and that she was just trying to communicate she hoped that she never had to interact with him again. Lower courts dismissed her case stating that her first amendment rights had not been violated. The decision went to appeals.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, SALT LAKE DEPARTMENT…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: William E. Story had promised his nephew, William E. Story II, $5,000 if his nephew would abstain from drinking alcohol, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until the nephew reached 21 years of age. The uncle responded to his nephew in a letter dated February 6, 1875 in which he told his nephew that he would fulfill his promise. The uncle died a couple years later without sending the money to the nephew.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Can Mr. McPhillen be held liable for assault, battery and false imprisonment when he came to the defense of someone?…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On November 12, 1984, Dethorne Graham was starting to recognize the onset of a diabetic reaction. He knew what he needed and he asked one of his friends to drive him to the nearest convenience store. Graham walked away from the car towards the convenience store without noticing the police officer, Connor, that was sitting across the road. Although once Graham got in the store and realized how many people were in the store he quickly walked out thinking it would be faster to go somewhere else. Connor then saw this happen and decided to follow them and pulled them over a little ways down the road. The driver, William Berry tried to tell Connor that Graham was a diabetic but Connor did not want to listen. Graham got out of the car and passed out on the curb. An officer that had arrived on the scene, rolled Graham over and handcuffed him. Four officers then picked him off of the ground and slammed him on the hood of Berry’s car. Graham had tried to tell the officers to get his wallet where he had a card labeling him as a diabetic. One officer told him to “Shut up!” and slammed his head on the car again. Officer Connor then got word that Graham had not done anything wrong at the store. The officers took him home and released him but not before…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Appellant refused, and was informed by the officer he was being charged with regusal to provide a breath sample, and informed him of his rights…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On May 6, 2016 a police officer found himself facing a young African American holding a pistol. Police officer, Stephan Mader, was let go from his position weeks later for not shooting the African American with the pistol. Stephan Mader is suing the city because he does not think it is fair that he was let go for not shooting a person. The reason Stephan Mader did not shot the African American was because it seem that the guy, Mr. Williams, wanted to commit suicide by a police officer. Mr. William told Stephan to shot him. Stephan was trying to come down Mr. William until two other police officer saw Mr. William waving the gun and shot him dead. Then they notice that the weapon that Mr. William had was not loaded. A country prosecutor had…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case: Watson vs Brown Issue: The case concerned the right of Mr. Watson right to protest against the Brown Corporation. Mr.Watson says that the Brown Corporation has been attacking him because he posted an article about how their products aren’t really real and they have been selling the people fake products. Watson’s claim was the Brown Corporation was taking his 4th Amendment protection away from by them constantly coming after him because he posted the article about their Cooperation. The Story….…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shenkley V. Tabuena

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evidence that the shopkeeper denied the suspect access to basic necessities may also support a finding that the detainment was not carried out in a reasonable manner. For example, in the Koepnick case, the suspect was approached by store employees in an unlit area of the parking lot which led him to believe the two were trying to “hustle” him. While one employee blocked the suspect’s path, the other grabbed his shopping bag, took the wrench from the bag, and waved it at him. Koepnick, 762 P.2d at 617. The mistreatment continued when the employees pushed the suspect around and refused his requests to use the telephone and to get a drink of water. The Arizona Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s denial of the shopkeeper’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of reasonableness of detention. Id. at…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard Case

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The petitioner filed for habeas corpus relief in the federal courts. The question was whether Sheppard was deprived of a fair trail and his right to due process according to the Sixth Amendment. Was the petitioner denied a fair trail for the second-degree murder of his wife, of which he was convicted, because of the trail judge’s failure to protect Sheppard sufficiently from the massive, pervasive, and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution?…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington Case Law Case

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Under Washington case law, plaintiffs are required to prove causation with expert testimony if alleged injury involves obscure medical factors. [cite]. The trickier question is whether the expert needs to demonstrate a direct causal link between the alleged injuries and the negligent act or if the expert merely must demonstrate that the plaintiff’s injuries are of a type that can be caused by the negligent act. Washington courts have come down on both sides of this question.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Training Day Violations

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alonzo and Jake pulled over a vehicle after viewing them buy drugs for recreational use. They used violent confrontation and intimidation towards the suspects and citizens, along while they seized they drugs. It triggered the citizens constitutional right but because the drugs were not in plain sight, nor did…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 2270 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In Albright, the Fourth Amendment was declared the proper vehicle for analyzing a malicious prosecution claim. In that case, the plaintiff Albright was arrested pursuant to a warrant on suspicion of selling a substance that looked like an illegal drug. Albright posted bond and was released on the condition that he not leave the state without permission. The trial court eventually dismissed the charges against him “on the ground that the charge did not state an offense under Illinois law.” Albright, 510 U.S. at 268-69 (plurality opinion).…

    • 2270 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays