Preview

Lao-Tzu vs. Machiavelli

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lao-Tzu vs. Machiavelli
Lao-tzu vs. Machiavelli Government is the essential authority of a country or state, which directly affects society because it provides key securities. How directly involved should the government be in the personal lives of society? To answer this I will look to the ideas of Lao-tzu (sixth century B.C.), believed to be author of the Tao-te Ching, and Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527), author of The Prince There are few ways in which they are similar, but have very opposite views and ideas of government. Lao-tzu’s view is government should not have optimal power over the people He feels as though the less people know they are being governed, the happier they will be. For example, in the Tao-te Ching Lao-tzu states, “If you want to be a great leader,/ you must learn to follow the Tao./ Stop trying to control./Let go of fixed plans and concepts,/ and the world will govern itself.” (Verse 57)
In Lao-tzu’s writing he refers to the governing body as master. If things happen as nature intends them there will be no need for the Master to make promises he cannot and does not intend to keep. For instance line 16 verse 29 of the Tao-te Ching, “The Master sees things as they are/ without trying to control them./She lets them go their own way,/ and resides at the center of the circle.” Lao-tzu takes into consideration the individuals and what they can do for themselves, not what they can do for the master. The Master completes the task at hand and does not brag on himself. When this is done the people will think they have done the thing on their own and be proud. Lao-tzu believes people will do the right thing. Wealth and possession of lavish material things are of no concern. In a sense let go of desired things rather than needs. As Lao-tzu sees it when one person has no more than his neighbor he will not desire to have what he does not. Therefore theft will be nonexistent. Lao-tzu does not believe in the use of weapons, man should have no enemies. We are all human and



Cited: Jacobus, Lee A. "LAO-TZU Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching." A World of Ideas: Essential Readings for College Writers. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2006. 21-31. Print. Jacobus, Lee A. "Niccolò Machiavelli The Qualities of the Prince." A World of Ideas: Essential Readings for College Writers. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2006. 37-52. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu's "Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching" and Machiavelli's "The Qualities of a Prince" both have the ultimate goal of making better leaders. The tactics that each writer chooses to present as a guide for the leader are almost opposite of each other. Today's American government would benefit from a combination of the two extreme ideas. Lao-Tzu's laissez-faire attitude towards the economy, as well as his small scale, home defense military is appealing to a liberal person. Machiavelli's attitude towards miserliness and lower taxes, while being always prepared for war, would appeal to a conservative person. The writers are in agreement on some issues, such as taxes, but other ideas, such as government involvement in the everyday lives of citizens are completely opposed to one another. Lao-Tzu believes in moderation and small government. He states that a leader should stay within his country and govern his people only.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli, N. (2010). The qualities of the prince. In L. A. Jacobus (Ed.), A world of ideas: Essential readings for college writers (pp. 39-52). Boston, MA: Bedford/ St. Martin’s…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lao-Tzu states “Act for the people’s benefit. Trust them; leave them alone.” (214) He feels that people at the heart of it are simple and good, and that if only left to the ways of the universe, they would live simple and good lives without ambition, desire, or want. “I let go of the law, and people become honest. I let go of economics, and people become prosperous. I let go of religion, and people become serene. I let go of all desire for the common good, and the good becomes common as grass.”…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu believes in moderation and small government. He states that a leader should stay within his country and govern his people only. He stresses that when the maser governs, the people should hardly be aware that he exists. A leader who is loved is better than one who is feared. The worst is one who is despised (22). Lao-Tzu also believes that war is not necessary when all follow the Tao. He states that "violence, even well intentioned, always rebounds upon itself;" therefore, if you have a neutral position, you will not be harmed (24). He believes that people are inherently good and not greedy. Man's greediness comes from an overemphasis on material things. Machiavelli believes in a strong government. The leader should be strong and feared, but not despised. A hated leader would invite a rebellion that would try to remove him from power. On the other hand, a leader should not be loved. Showing too much compassion will make the people think you are weak, and he would permit disorders to continue. Machiavelli urges the leader to always be personally armed, and preparing for war, even in peace time. The leader…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He elaborates on the fact that the best leader is not even known to exist. “When (the master’s) work is done, the people will say, “Amazing : we did it, all by ourselves””, according to Lao. He is trying to restate and exaggerate the, quite possibly most important, point in his writing. He states that “the master doesn't talk, he acts”, showing that he is not only a leader for the positive relationship he has with the people, but also for doing the things that need to be done. Despite this fact, this “best type” of leader doesn't take the credit for what could be argued is his success. He does this because of the trusting bond and positive relationship he holds with his people, allowing them the success, but also maintaining his role in leadership by not even hinting at the true depth of his rule. And it is because of this that I agree with Lao-tzu; anyone this selfless and pure of intent deserves to rule over a trustworthy people, just as much as the people of any place deserve a leader of this…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao Tze VS Plato

    • 1137 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Around 600 BC, Lao Tze was born in the region of China which we now refer to as Hunan. Nearly 200 years later, Socrates was born in Athens, Greece. In these two hundred years, Lao Tze's teachings spread across 5000 miles, as the crow flies, and influenced ancient Greece. This is evident in the writings and teachings of Socrates and Plato. There are many affinities between Taoist and Platonic philosophies, such as the preferred method of selecting leaders, the desire to seek an ultimate truth, and the philosophy of anti-materialism.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way in which a leader governs his country can differ for different countries. Two polar opposites would be Lao-Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli. They're both on opposite sides of the spectrum for their ideas on how a leader should govern. Lao-Tzu leans more towards a less intrusive government, while Machiavelli believes in powerful rulers. Some of their ideas are shown today in our society, some good and some bad.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout ancient Chinese history, several philosophers led lives with efforts of “reforming a world seen as descending into chaos.” Inarguably, the most influential philosopher of his era was Confucius. Confucian thought provides detailed accounts of how life should be regulated to be successful. Three of the most extensively-covered topics in Confucian thought include The Superior Man, education, and government. Due to their precise accounts of how to maintain an orderly lifestyle, the beliefs concerning The Superior Man, Education, and Government allow Confucian principles to solely act as a method of organizing society.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Midterm Essay

    • 2614 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a ruler in the Warring States period, my kingdom’s survival has the utmost importance. Therefore, choosing a philosophy to base my government upon is a crucial decision. Legalism, Confucianism, Mohism, and Daoism are all great philosophies but for my state, I choose to implement Legalism. Legalism supports a rigid system based on publicized laws that deals out punishments and rewards accordingly. Legalism also emphasis an adherence to laws and customs, obedience to the ruler and receiving influential positions based on merit. Legalism as a national strategy of governance is crucial in times of chaos and constant fighting. For my kingdom I demand absolute obedience from my subjects. I want officials who are qualified by my side to help me make important decisions. I do not want a government full of family members and friends who do not have the credentials for the position. Also I believe everyone should be punished according to the law and there should be no special treatments for the nobles. Everyone is equal under the law in my state. I want to conquer neighboring lands and become the ruler of a unified China. Legalist ideas support my goals for conquest, wealth and a well-functioning government and that is why I choose to implement Legalism in my state.…

    • 2614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Taoism

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On Earth we are pushed almost simultaneously in some sort of direction, opportunity, decision, etc. and when these situations present themselves we face dilemmas of how and why we should approach them in a certain manner according to moral precepts, short and long term goals, and societal constraints. The teachings of Taoism are an excellent if not perfect life guide for these dealings, because the Tao, or “the way”, can be thought in terms of a form of enlightenment or remedy for the humanly ways of this world. The Tao upholds the natural proof that life is of the utmost importance and the most valued possession in life is intrinsically itself. In this supreme experience of life we face constant movement for advancement of self and quality of life by technology and mentality, yet the Tao gestures a content and simple life where these “improvements” aren’t the strives we need to be making. The orchestrator of Taoism himself, Lao Tzu, it was said, “the greatest Virtue is to follow the Tao and Tao alone” (Tzu 10) which states of the Tao’s incomparability to life’s other moral and spiritual modules. Throughout this paper I will divulge the in the functions of simplicity and humbleness professed in Taoism as well as the utility of the Tao in nearly every aspect of life.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-tzu advocates for “the center of the circle.” If people stay at the center of the Tao, all things will fall into place. I personally like this concept of “wholeness.” If the government tries too hard to govern, I believe that they will lose trust in the people and therefore lose the people’s happiness. Although Lao-tzu does not concern himself with the track to individual happiness, he does hint at a way to happiness through lack of governmental power, and personal acceptance of the Tao.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consumerism

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lao- Tzu “Thoughts from the Tao te Ching” A World of Ideas. Ed Lee A. Jacobus. Bedford/ St. Martin’s: 2010 21-35. Print…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tao Te Ching

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First, Laozi wrote the Tao te Ching to teach any individual to become a great master for their life. He conducts people to govern their ability, their soul. The most important is the concept of Laozi’s three treasures, which are: simplicity, patience, compassion “I have just three things to teach: simplicity, patience, compassion” ( Chapter 67). The author states that power, possession, and ambition are hard to keep and maintain. The true and easy way to live is with tolerance, humility, and peace. For example, when I do something bad, I tend to be upset in my mind. Sometimes I do feel really bad. Then I figure out that, to prevent the bad feeling, all I need to do is try to do not do the bad thing in the first place.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My Ideal Government

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After reading both the Lao-tzu and Machiavelli, I believe that a good government should be concerned about the people more than themselves. Governments are built from the people to serve the people and to help make the world a better and safer place. Laws need to be put into place to help keep and control what happens and punish whom does not abide by those laws. Machiavelli and Lao-tzu both had good points on how a government should be run, but Machiavelli was too strict in some areas and Lao-tzu was too lenient in many areas. Machiavelli’s illustration of a government was closer to my illustration because he was stricter in laws, his idea of being a feared leader, and how he puts the priorities of his people first. A good government should always be looking for ways to help the people and always listen to the people’s needs.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays