Preview

Lao Tze VS Plato

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1137 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lao Tze VS Plato
Around 600 BC, Lao Tze was born in the region of China which we now refer to as Hunan. Nearly 200 years later, Socrates was born in Athens, Greece. In these two hundred years, Lao Tze's teachings spread across 5000 miles, as the crow flies, and influenced ancient Greece. This is evident in the writings and teachings of Socrates and Plato. There are many affinities between Taoist and Platonic philosophies, such as the preferred method of selecting leaders, the desire to seek an ultimate truth, and the philosophy of anti-materialism.

Plato and Lao Tze first agree in their method of selecting leaders. In "The Allegory of the Cave" by Plato, it is suggested that leaders be selected by a method in which only the greatest minds are allowed to be come leaders. This sentiment is paralleled in Lao Tze's "Tao Te Ching." Both writings believe leaders should be enlightened philosophically. Plato states, "Whereas if they go to the administration of public affairs, poor and hungering after their own private advantage, thinking that hence they are to snatch the chief good, order there can never be; for they will be fighting about office, and the civil and domestic broils which thus arise will be the ruin of the rulers themselves and of the whole State." Lao Tze reinforces this thought, in Chapter 81, with "So the sage does not serve himself; / The more he does for others, the more he is satisfied; / The more he gives, the more he receives. / Nature flourishes at the expense of no one; / So the sage benefits all men and contends with none." Secondly, both Plato and Lao Tze believe that those who are meant to be leaders should be leaders. Plato writes, "And will our pupils, when they hear this, refuse to take their turn at the toils of State, when they are allowed to spend the greater part of their time with one another in the heavenly light? Impossible, he answered; for they are just men, and the commands which we impose upon them are just; there can be no doubt that every one of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary: The writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu indicate that they would disagree most strongly on the concept of how a government should run. Machiavelli believed that in strong government control by a prince who acted more in terms of practicality and maintaining power than through moral principles. Lao Tzu, on the other hand, took a more individualistic, carefree approach, believing that a ruler will be respected and followed if he does not act powerfully and force rules and issues.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many kinds of leaders in this world that believe that their style of leadership is the best. Machiavelli and Lao Tzu were two people that believed that their style of ruling was the best way to rule. They were both extremely outspoken and they stood by their ways. Both Machiavelli and Lao Tzu were very clear about how they thought a government should be run. Even though they both held strong opinions on how a government should be ran, they could not be any more different. If Machiavelli agreed with one topic, most likely, Lao Tzu would be completely against it. Their beliefs are the exact opposite of each other. Machiavelli thought that a ruler should be very strict while Lao Tzu thought that they should be laid back and let the people live their lives the way they wanted too.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thucydides vs Plato

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Compare and contrast Thucydides’ and Socrates’ analyses of the fate of Athenian democracy in war, of why the Athenians went to war, and of how and why they failed.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He elaborates on the fact that the best leader is not even known to exist. “When (the master’s) work is done, the people will say, “Amazing : we did it, all by ourselves””, according to Lao. He is trying to restate and exaggerate the, quite possibly most important, point in his writing. He states that “the master doesn't talk, he acts”, showing that he is not only a leader for the positive relationship he has with the people, but also for doing the things that need to be done. Despite this fact, this “best type” of leader doesn't take the credit for what could be argued is his success. He does this because of the trusting bond and positive relationship he holds with his people, allowing them the success, but also maintaining his role in leadership by not even hinting at the true depth of his rule. And it is because of this that I agree with Lao-tzu; anyone this selfless and pure of intent deserves to rule over a trustworthy people, just as much as the people of any place deserve a leader of this…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato Vs Aphrodite

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As I was reading through the chapters of my art book, there were two pieces of art that caught my eye: the statue of "Nefertiti" and the statue "Aphrodite of Melos." After researching both artworks, I realized that these statues…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Plato, leadership is not just a power or decision-making authority; it is the system and process developed to establish the culture and how things are done in an organization or government. The nature of leadership should be driven by what is right and what is just. Plato believed that a monarch who served the best interest of the citizens was preferred to direct democracies that act to serve their own personal interest. According to Plato, leaders should serve the good of the people and not the good of the rulers or themselves. Plato felt that good leaders could only be men wise in years with education and experience. A person leads based on their knowledge,…

    • 4179 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Timaeus Vs Plato

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Creator copied this world, regardless of how its imperfections may appear to support otherwise, from an eternal, immutable, and perfect model. The Creator, or God, combined the elements of earth, air, fire, and water to create the universe and all within it. As this universe would be the only copy made, no additional material remained. With order considered perfection, the God turned a disorderly substance into an orderly sphere which would become the universe. Next, God created heaven and with it time, which had not been needed in the eternal model. Then, four species were designed yet only created one, that of the gods. It became the responsibility of the gods to create the other species, water, air, and land creatures. Among these creatures…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato V. Augustine

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After reading both Plato’s Symposium and Saint Augustine’s Confessions, one can see how the latter holds certain ideas and concepts that are parallel to those found in the former. Despite the differences in time, men are hindered from their pursuit of goodness, truth, etcetera, by similar, if not entirely identical, desires. That being said, of all of the speeches found in the Symposium, Augustine would connect most deeply to that of Alcibiades.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We know more about Kong Fuzi’s life than Laozi’s life based on their teachings and the knowledge of scholars. We have knowledge that Kong Fuzi (also called Confucius) lived in China from 551 to 479 B.C.E. and was born into a family of low-ranking nobles. Kong Fuzi became mournful when the Zhou empire weakened and various Chinese states began to battle for power, he missed a peaceful and stable society. When it comes to Laozi’s life, scholars know so little about it that some people believe he is just a legendary figure. However, many scholars believe that Laozi was born in the late sixth century B.C.E. and kept records in the court of the Zhou Empire.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato vs. Nietzsche

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The central ideas that two great philosophers, Plato and Friedrich Nietzsche, talked about were the reality and appearance; and what they mainly focused on is where we as humans stand between these two. Of course, regarding the fact that Plato and Nietzsche lived in different time periods, they had their differences that conflict with each other’s theories. But they do have something to agree upon; they both argue that humans live in an illusory world of our own that we think is reality when we actually are not. One important idea they disagree on is their concepts on what is reality and what is truth. Plato’s theory is mostly based on his cave allegory where he explains human’s conditions. I will explain the similarities and differences between Plato and Nietzsche through the cave allegory.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs. Plato

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Excellence is a function which renders excellent the thing of which it is a function is Plato's definition of virtue. What does this definition really mean though? Plato and Aristotle both had their own unique arguments devoted to the topic at hand, and their own ways of describing what virtue really is. Defining virtue may seem to be an easy taste, but to truly understand the arguments behind the definition can prove to be very challenging.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato vs Locke

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In analyzing the works of Plato and John Locke I feel that Plato presents a more accurate idealism in how a society should be maintained. Plato puts ultimate power in those with the highest knowledge. I feel that this concept is necessary in order to have a successful regime, thus I support in my argument.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Vs Buddhism Essay

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Throughout history, there has been a variety of opinions and theories regarding the body and the soul. The two most common known philosophies regarding the body and the soul are Plato’s theories and Buddhism. Each have their own ways of viewing how the body and the soul connect to each other and how they function during a life. Buddhism, an old eastern religion that believes in no monotheistic creator and reincarnation. Buddhist’s also have their own notion that creates a connection between the soul and the body. Despite the differences between the two philosophies, I will argue that there are greater similarities between Plato’s and Buddhism’s notions of the soul. Throughout this essay, the ideas of parallel interpretations of the soul, individual…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle Versus Plato

    • 5031 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Plato and Aristotle argue that artist (Demiurge) and poet imitate nature, thus, a work of art is a reflection of nature. However, they have different views on the functions of imitation in art and literature. Plato believes in the existence of the ideal world, where exists a real form of every object found in nature. A work of art –which reflects nature is twice far from the reality it represents. Aristotle, on the other hand, does not deal with the ideal world, instead he analyses nature. He argues that a work of art does not imitate nature as it is, but as it should be. In this sense, an artist does not violate the truth but reflects the reality. Key Words: Imitation, art, literature, mimesis, etymology, ethic.…

    • 5031 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics