Preview

Kantian Ethics concerning human Cloning.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1585 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kantian Ethics concerning human Cloning.
Cloning is a procedure conceived to notion in the late 1960s, but it is only recently that it was fully understood and that scientists have started to figure out how to successfully copy the genetic composition of one organism to another. Since science already knows how to do this, the only problems and obstacles that remains is efficiency and the success ratio of each operation. The cloning process consists of taking the nucleus of an organism, and placing it, along with the DNA that contains all the genetic material, in place of the nucleus of the host egg. The egg then forms an embryo and matures into the same exact "copy", at least genetically, as the original organism. Already done on mammals, cloning is something that can be extended to utilize humans as subjects. In the future it will be wholly possible to create human clones to serve whatever purpose they were conceived for. However, presently there are numerous ethical issues surrounding cloning and there are problems about the implications of the use of cloning for the purpose of medicine. This issue plagues us so much that the constant objections of bioethicists and political and religious leaders have caused the US Government to propose a ban on all research concerning human cloning until a conclusion is reached on the moral and ethical aspects of the process. (Macer, 2)

In this paper, I will discuss how Kantian views and ethics help us understand whether it is morally ethical to clone for the purpose of bettering our lives. Two points have to be distinguished. How exactly will human cloning aid medicine and society, and the implications of human worth and dignity when applied to clones.

Kantian ethics were proposed by Immanuel Kant in his critical writing of the "Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals". Kant argued that "non-rational things have only a relative value as means and are consequently called things. Rational beings, on the other hand, are called persons because their nature already marks



Bibliography: Friedman, Dan. "Cloning" Macalester Journal of Philosophy Vol. 9, 1999 Gardner, Jennifer. "To Clone or Not to Clone" http://pages.prodigy.net/darvi/clone.htm (12 Feb, 2001) "Kant, Immanuel" Encyclopaedia Britannica: In Depth Knowledge 1999 ed. Macer, Darryl R.J., Ph.D. "Ethical Challenges as we approach the end of the Human Genome Project." N.p: n.p. 2000 Ruse, Michael, and Sheppard, Aryne. Cloning: Responsible Science or Technomadness? Prometheus Books, December 2000

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Ever since the birth of the first cloned sheep, named Dolly, the dream of human cloning has existed (Van Dijck, 1999). Cloning a mammal is described as the manipulation of an animal or human cell in order to create an identical copy of that animal’s or human’s nucleic DNA (Andrews, 1997). Though the dream of a human clone also comes with a lot of controversy regarding ethics and morals. Embryotic stem cell research, which could lead to a renewable source of human tissue, cells and eventually entire organs (Bowring, 2004), is highly controversial due to the necessity of placing a cloned embryo into a woman’s body in order to achieve that research. Politicians differentiate between therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning as they refer to the second as “implanting a cloned embryo in a woman's womb” (Bowring, 2004), as for the embryo itself the research is not very therapeutic. Furthermore cloning by transfer of nuclei is not very effective yet as only 1% of manipulated sheep eggs reach adulthood and the number is even lower for other animals (Solter, 2000). The question whether human cloning will ever be possible and ethical remains to be answered but it seems certain that extra research in embryotic stem cells will improve techniques and success rates, which eventually brings the realization of a human clone closer one step at a time.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kass's Argument Analysis

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In conclusion, all of Kass’s objections make valid point on why cloning us unethical in our current society. The objections can be seen as premature thoughts because we are not living in the actual era of cloning. Cloning is still very experimental and we do not know all the benefits and effects of cloning. Therefore, some of Kass’s arguments can be ruled out. Even if cloning is improved and become beneficial one question that will remain is, is it ethical to…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this two-part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and the ethics of therapeutic cloning. In the first part, Prentice argues that creating clones for the purpose of embryonic stem cell research, called "therapeutic cloning," is no different from reproductive cloning, which creates a living human child. Also, he points out, therapeutic cloning is not therapeutic for the embryo. In the second part of the viewpoint, Saunders builds on Prentice's argument and goes even…

    • 3138 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay based on the topic: “On the issue of cloning, an early pioneer of cloning research, Dr. James D. Watson, believed that over time society would see that the good would outweight the bad”.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world today, there are many of concerns on what is ethical right. One of these topics that is a big concern is the cloning of animals. Many people believe animal cloning can be extremely beneficial in the world, but others believe it is morally wrong. Although people around the world may disagree, scientists have decided to take the risk and began the attempt to clone animals, causing political debate. Although cloning is a personal bias and people may not believe in it, people have taken on the challenge of attempting to clone animals to see the possibilities that could come from it.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro's & Con's of Cloning

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cloning created identical genes, which is a process of replicating a genetic constitution therefore it hampers the differences in genes. If we lessen the diversity in genes there is less of a chance for adaptation. Cloning can offer the ability to choose which traits fir reproduction it also has the chance of giving undesirable traits. While cloning human organs and using them for ‘spare parts’ or in cloning itself technical and economical barriers will be considered. On the moral and ethical front as well, cloning raises several serious questions. It devalues man-kind, as a new birth is a natural process, and seriously undermines the value of human life.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identification problems will arise if cloning is carried out. As genetically identical individuals are created, many applications used for identifying people would be no longer serviceable. It is arduous to distinguish between who is produced in the laboratory and who is born from a mother. Moreover, during the time that a child is generated in the testing room, they would not possess actual family members (Phillips 301). Cloned children do not have an integral family, so someone may question who are they. This is the most critical dispute that can affect our society. Apart from the identification issue, the right to modify humans has become a seriously debated topic. Cloning is the way to create somebody you desire. That means you can design the person you crave. The most prevalent suggestion is copying a dying child for replacement. However, nobody has a chance to control whether or not “ a child is to be allowed to use its genes to create the child's child” (Masci 421). In nature, humans have no authority to devise another person, no matter who is he or she. Even though we are the most brilliant organisms in the world, we cannot break the law of naturre that we have always had. As the result, cloning should not be…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Due to the psychological characteristics of humanity, and all humans’ universal inability to continually adhere to a universally agreed form of ethics, our species has no other option but to proclaim that further experimentation at this time in the science of human cloning is immoral. Before it can be addressed whether or not the benefits would outweigh the consequences, it must first be established what those prominent consequences are and since it is not possible to determine precisely what the benefits would be, the benefits presumed are instead based on possible probability.…

    • 2163 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each person has a unique set of DNA. It is what make us who we are, but what happens when we experiment on our DNA? Cloning is the process of replacing the DNA of an egg with the DNA of a living organism. In 1997 the first living clone was created, which brought various questions about the cloning of humans. The main purpose of our reproductive system is to create new life, but we have subjected it, specifically human eggs, to experimentation. Human cloning is a direct violation of what makes us who we are, our DNA. By learning more about the complications of cloning and how scientists are using human eggs for experiments, we can understand that cloning should only be used on animals. Cloning has its benefits; however, no one can deny the…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human Cloning Is Wrong

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human cloning is the creation of a copy of another human being without involving sexual reproduction. It is sometimes called human reproductive cloning. Human cloning is one of the serious problems in this world. Actually, this problem is prohibited by the law and God because its process against God’s will which is creating human without eggs and sperms. Moreover, it brings a lot of disadvantages and bad effects for us as the human. Those are the reasons why human cloning is wrong.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of cloning

    • 730 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Every society has their specific views on what is right and what is wrong, which brings us to the question of what is ethical when it comes to cloning especially on humans and animals. Cloning has become a great controversial issue in today’s world where scientists and other people have different views on cloning. Some are hopeful as they believe that through genetic engineering, cloning is our future, giving the potential to save the lives of many people from terrible and deadly diseases. Nevertheless, some people might look at it from the religious point of view and their beliefs and argue that this is playing God, arguing that “only God has created life”. 1 As it can be seen in nature, by looking at single cell twins who have identical genetic material and yet are not the same person. Therefore it is impossible to create a new soul. On the other hand, many fear that it will result in people misusing the power of genetic engineering for purely physical purposes, stating that we may go too far — creating the dreaded "designer babies" whose appearance, IQ, creative talents and athletic ability will have been customized.2 As controversial as cloning is to today’s society, cloning has a great potential benefit within the field of medicine. By using cloning scientist are able to generate stem cells which are cells that haven’t been differentiated into specialized cells, to use for transplants such as replacement of unhealthy cells in an individual whether that be an animal or a human being. However, despite benefits such as transplants, cloning does carry some difficult ethical issues. It rises many questions such as when is it acceptable to use cloning in situations such as when a couple is unable to conceive a baby or when one member of the couple carries the genes for a heritable disease that could affect their offspring? Also, it presents us with issues like what kind of life would the cloned individual have? Wheather he would live like an…

    • 730 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning in general has been a rising debate across the globe since before Dolly the sheep was cloned in 1996. The success of being able to clone an animal brought scientists to wonder about a more challenging task, cloning humans. This consideration is morally wrong and should not be stood for. Some people seem not to realize the negative aspects that cloning would bring into a world which is already suffering. Religious standpoints, the growth of the population, and each human 's individuality are just a few of the supporting reasons that stand against cloning and support why it should not be legalized. Simply because there are a few factors that make some in favor of cloning does not rectify the atrocity that it would bring.…

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bio Ethics

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethics is a topic that is brought about mostly when science is involved. Ethics are the moral principles that determine the rightness or wrongness of particular acts or activities. Ethical issues concerning biological research are called bioethical issues. Some bioethical issues concern the topics of abortion, space exploration, cloning, etc. There are many pros and cons concerning the ethical issues. Pros support the issues and cons oppose the issues. In this report, I will be discussing the topic of cloning humans based on an article from The New York Times/ 12-3-97. I will also discuss the pros and cons of this procedure.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Cloning Be Banned

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The subject of human cloning is a very controversial topic. The cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1997 by scientist Ian Wilmut generated a very unexpected reaction around the world. However these reactions were not all positive. Cloning refers to the development of offspring that are identical to their parents genetically. While it is referred to as an unnatural process, it can occur quite often in nature. Identical twins, for example, are clones. However, human cloning is very new and very complex. In this essay I will examine both sides of the argument into the banning of cloning starting with reasons why cloning should not be banned.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays