The juvenile justice system and the adult justice system share their commonalities and differences. For example, the juvenile justice system makes it the point to rehabilitate instead of punishing juvenile delinquents. However, one must take into consideration that punishment is still a feasible concept within the juvenile system, but it is used prudently as a “last resort.” In instances of punishment for a teenager who is accused of an atrocious crime, he or she may be tried as an adult (Goldstein, 2007). According to Dr. Goldstein (2007) there are some similarities between the two justice systems as he states that “the police, judiciary, and corrections have discretion relative to decision making in both systems.”
For those adults and juveniles that admit guilt there is a system of procedural safeguards to protect their rights. Additionally, other commonalities between the age separated groups include plea bargaining, as well as the right to hearings and appeals. However, when adults are tried for crimes, they are tried in the adult court, while juveniles are tried in the juvenile court. Other differences exist, as Goldstein (2007) further states that “juvenile proceedings are not viewed as criminal,” and that “juvenile records, court hearings, etc. are confidential and not normally accessible; adult records are public.”
Most juveniles receive probation after conviction and the juvenile system in total is much like the intermediate sanctions of adult corrections. Once a juvenile offender is placed on probation he/she will be ordered to participate in some educational, counseling or restitution programs while on probation. Probation officers attend the schools the juveniles attend, to minimize the potential for more criminal activity (Clear T. Cole G. Reisig M. 2009).The juvenile correctional system warrants and receives more attention than the adult systems. Why not nip crime in the butt when it is present in younger offenders to minimize the potential of future criminals? When young children see that they have time to reform and live a better life, I believe for the most part they will.
Both juveniles and adults have the right to counsel in court proceedings. Nevertheless, juveniles may be represented by court appointed advocates who look out for the juvenile’s “best interest,” as a parent would for his or her child; with right ways to help the child rehabilitate. In the case of adult trials, court appointed advocates may be representing the accused, but the “best interest” lies in reducing or foregoing the sentence, not rehabilitate (Goldstein, 2007). In the cases of both groups, a “traditional” counsel may be hired to represent the individual
While due process is given to all (juveniles and adults alike), juvenile offenders seem to be helped out more than adult offenders. Also, children tried as juveniles cannot be sentenced to adult jails or prisons. There are many debates over these and the other aforementioned practices, with critics and proponents on all issues, but I personally think the system is good and it can only get better with time
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In recent discussion of Juvenile Justice, a controversial issue has been whether juveniles should be tried as adults in adult courts for heinous crimes they have committed. On one hand, some argue that they should not be tried as adults and do not deserve harsh sentences but as children seeking help. On the other hand, however, others argue that those who commit such heinous crimes ought to be punished no matter the age. The juvenile court was created to handle juvenile offenders on the basis of their youth rather than their crimes. The purpose of juvenile court is treatment and guidance rather than punishment. Juveniles don't have the knowledgeable or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. Juveniles today are more knowledgeable and cultured at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how violent weapons are used. It is irrational to argue that a juvenile, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, does not understand what killing really is. The fact that “adolescent killers” know how to load and shoot a gun or use a knife to kill is an indicator that they understand exactly what they're doing.…
- 696 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This archive file includes CJA 374 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Juvenile and Adult Courts A Comparative Analysis…
- 431 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…
- 2342 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Some of the processes for both of the courts are similar; however, they use different terminology, such as adults have bail hearings whereas juveniles have detention hearings, adults with trials and juveniles with fact-finding hearings. An adult has a complaint or indictment filed against them, although a juvenile is accused with a petition being filed against them. The adult is identified as the defendant in the court, but the juvenile is referred to as the respondent. The verdict is agreed upon by the jury in the adult court system, whereas the judge makes a ruling, referred to as the adjudication. In an adult court case, the defendant is found to be guilty or not guilty, however the juveniles are found to be delinquent or involved. While the differences exist amongst the two court systems, the adult and juvenile courts share similarities such as, both the criminal and the delinquent have the right to an attorney.. Delinquents have the privilege against self-incrimination, just as criminals have the same right, including the right to receive the notice of charges, and lastly the prosecution must provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt before a person can be…
- 1973 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
There are many differences in juvenile court and in adult court. In the juvenile justice system rehabilitation and treatment, in addition to community protection, are considered to be primary and viable goals. In criminal adult court rehabilitation is not considered a primary goal in the criminal justice system, which operates under the assumption that criminal sanctions should be proportional to the offense. Deterrence is seen as a successful outcome of punishment (Vermont Judiciary, 2004). Limitations are placed on public access to juvenile records because of the belief that juvenile offenders can be successfully rehabilitated, and to avoid their unnecessary stigmatization. Court proceedings may be confidential to…
- 2144 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the justice system juveniles is quite different from the adults criminal. In the justice system their main objective is to rehabilitate the juvenile while as for adults their objectives are to deter crime and punish the offender. When it comes to juveniles in the justice system issues are developed and questions are raised whether or not juveniles should be adjudicated to the adult court system. When juveniles are adjudicated to the adult court system, there are many issues introduced to the justice system, such as at what age should juveniles be adjudicated to adult court and for which crimes.…
- 398 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Some similarities between the two include the right to an attorney, the right to due process, the right against self-incrimination, the right to be notified of charges against them, and the prosecution must provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict them. They can plea bargain and appeal in much the same way as an adult on trial can. Should juveniles be afforded the same legal rights as an adult offender? Juveniles did not receive as many rights until the 1960’s, when juvenile crime increased, and trials became more formal. Obviously, the juvenile courtroom has begun to mirror the adult form in many ways over the years, but only when the heinousness of the act allows it to do so. However, the majority of that is to ensure that juveniles are afforded as many constitutional rights as they should be to ensure justice is properly served from the courts, and to maintain their protection from unethical treatment. As juvenile crimes have become increasingly brutal over the years, it is important that if a juvenile commits…
- 1166 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Several authors address the issues surrounding juveniles who are tried as adults (Hudson, 2009; Mason, Chapman, Chang & Simons, 2003; Nunez, Tang, 2003). Hudson (2009) emphasizes…
- 1525 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Juvenile incarceration has created a lot of uncertainties in the legal justice system. This is because it is often assumed that indeed there are several persons that are underage that at the time of the crime did not have the proper mental reasoning to appreciate that indeed they were committing a crime. For this reason, there has been several problems regarding Juvenile incarceration and it has been argued that there is a need to re-evaluate and ensure that indeed the problems that affect the system are given the proper judicial involvement and justice. . This paper is going to examine how different it is from adults and juvenile when it comes to…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Juveniles are treated different than adults for obvious reasons. One of the more popular ones include, that juvenile brains aren’t fully developed so teens don’t fully understand what they are doing. Another thing that is different about adults and juveniles is who usually decides the cases. In adult cases, their fate lies…
- 874 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The primary difference between the juvenile court system and the adult court system is that the juvenile is viewed by the court with more civility and as an delinquent and on the other hand in adult court is it view with criminality. Moreover, the standard of proof when it comes to a juvenile he or she in the courts system is looked upon as with the preponderance of the evidence and in adult court the standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. However, both the adult and the juvenile has the right to remain silent and refrain from self-incrimination and also, they both have the right to confront their accusers and the right to counsel and/or an attorney.…
- 588 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For those adults and juveniles that admit guilt there is a system of procedural safeguards to protect their rights. Additionally, other commonalities between the age separated groups include plea bargaining, as well as the right to hearings and appeals. However, when adults are tried for crimes, they are tried in the adult court, while juveniles are tried in the juvenile court. Other differences exist, as Goldstein (2007) further states that “juvenile proceedings are not viewed as criminal,” and that “juvenile records, court hearings, etc. are confidential and not normally accessible; adult records are public.”…
- 382 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Edwin Desamour was driving with his 3-year-old son in their Philadelphia neighborhood when the little boy looked up and said, “Daddy, look at the moon! I want to go there,” so his father did what many parents would: he bought his son books on science and space and encouraged him to believe that his dreams can come true. Edwin’s son has been blessed with a vastly different childhood than Edwin had. Edwin grew up poor in a violent neighborhood in Philadelphia, surrounded by drugs, guns, and rimes. At age sixteen he was convicted of homicide. The time he spent with his father as a teenager came when they were assigned to the same cellblock in prison. Edwin was caught up in dangerous surroundings he did not chose, and his violent actions as an adolescent resulted in terrible loss, but he matured in prison and was determined to earn parole so he could return to his old neighborhood and make a difference in the lives of other young men (Edelman 1). Juvenile justice refers to teenagers going to jails for committing crimes like stilling, killing or abusing someone or even a school fight. Well for me juvenile justice is wrong because every person deserves a second chance because nobody is perfect. Kids are able to change after their first mistake. My topics are about students that regularly show up in the courtroom who shouldn’t be there and youths being treated like adults are it right or wrong? And my last topic is about the courtrooms are they being racist or are they obeying the law.…
- 867 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
were half prison and half school house, and they were occupied by orphans and children…
- 1749 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
There are many differences between juvenile and criminal courts. First off there is no bail for juveniles. In juvenile court the child is not called the defendant he or she is called a minor. The documents list the charges against the child as a petition rather than a complaint. There are no trails for minors instead there are jurisdictional hearings or adjudications. There are no jurys. In these hearings it is common for a judge or bench officer to question parents or guardians about their child. Juvenile courts are closed to the public. There are a big difference between the two.…
- 103 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays