Juvenile Court Vs Adult Court Essay
Should juveniles who commit adult offence like murder, rape and armed robbery etc. be charged or dealt with as an adult? The primary difference in dealing with a juvenile meaning a person that is 18 years or younger the goal is not to punish the juvenile, but rather rehabilitate, is that fair? Or is society as a whole are guilty and to blame for forsaking the future generation? The juvenile offences are skyrocketing at an alarming rate that it is hard to view the graphic and horrific crimes of the juvenile as being anything but civil or delinquent, especially when the juvenile is committing bloody murder.
The primary difference between the juvenile court system and the adult court system is that the juvenile is viewed by the court with more civility and as an delinquent and on the other hand in adult court is it view with criminality. Moreover, the standard of proof when it comes to a juvenile he or she in the courts system is looked upon as with the preponderance of the evidence and in adult court the standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. However, both the adult and the juvenile has the right to remain silent and refrain from self-incrimination and also, they both have the right to confront their accusers and the right to counsel and/or an attorney.
Should a juvenile at the age of 15 be tried as an …show more content…
I believe that the court should give a little more latitude to the victims because some victims do not believe in the death penalty so that is why I say that the courts should let their decision be influenced by the victims and the victim’s family members. I believe when the decision for putting a 15 year old to death and trying them as adults let the courts and the victim’s family member play a major role in that
The primary difference between the juvenile court system and the adult court system is that the juvenile is viewed by the court with more civility and as an delinquent and on the other hand in adult court is it view with criminality. Moreover, the standard of proof when it comes to a juvenile he or she in the courts system is looked upon as with the preponderance of the evidence and in adult court the standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt. However, both the adult and the juvenile has the right to remain silent and refrain from self-incrimination and also, they both have the right to confront their accusers and the right to counsel and/or an attorney.
Should a juvenile at the age of 15 be tried as an …show more content…
I believe that the court should give a little more latitude to the victims because some victims do not believe in the death penalty so that is why I say that the courts should let their decision be influenced by the victims and the victim’s family members. I believe when the decision for putting a 15 year old to death and trying them as adults let the courts and the victim’s family member play a major role in that