Preview

Just Take Away Their Guns Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1453 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just Take Away Their Guns Analysis
Analysis On The Article “Just Take Away Their Guns “ James Q. Wilson was a professor at the following colleges. Harvard University, University Of California Los Angeles, Chicago, and Pepperdine. Wilson was involved in the fields of political science, public administration and sociology. Wilson was known to get his information from many different sources like the research of others, eyewitness accounts and research documents. His coworkers and students say he was a reasonable man. Also that he would change his viewpoint if he was wrong about something and was provided factual evidence to support the viewpoint. Wilson was open to criticism . Wilson had set ideas on “Gun Control”. James Q. Wilson wrote a great article called “Just Take Away Their Guns”. The article “Just Take Away Their Guns “ originally appeared on March 20, 1994 in The New York Times Magazine. In this article Wilson speaks about how gun laws do not work and they reduce the amount a law-abiding citizen can do to protect themselves when needed.
The
…show more content…
In (JTATG) there are three sentences that stand out at the beginning and they are “The president wants still tougher gun control legislation and thinks it will work” ( Wilson). “ The public supports more gun control laws but suspects they will not work” (Wilson). “The public Is right” (Wilson). In the article it states that there are around 200 million firearms in private ownership and that around one-third of them are handguns.] For example, while it is true that the number of shooting rampages has increased in recent years, the rate of violent crimes and homicides for both Blacks and Whites (including those committed with firearms) has decreased significantly over the same period, despite the tremendous increase in the number of firearms in the U.S., according to both the FBI Uniform Crime Reports and the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (Miguel A. Faria

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Invincible Ignorance” by Thomas Sowell appeared in The Bismarck Tribune as apart of his syndicated column on December 24, 2012. Are gun control laws effective? Are guns really the problem? Or is it people that are the problem? Sowell answers each of these questions and states his opinion strong and clear. His tone, diction and background all play roles in his rhetorical strategy for his article. Gun control was a huge topic in the year 2012 and continues to be as we move into 2013.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This newspaper article was written by David Jackson, Kennedy Kelly, and USA TODAY news report. David Jackson has been a news reporter for over three decades. He works for USA TODAY and covers for the White House. Kennedy Kelly is an author for ‘They Fought for Each Other’ and also is an Army veteran. She also covers the health policy for USA TODAY. The authors share their opinion on firearms because they want the people in The United Sates to be educated on what is happening in the nation. This newspaper article was published in September 2013; the intended audience is the whole United States. Although the article was published about three years ago gun policy is still, to this day a problem that is not getting resolved. This lack of resolvment…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Just Take Away Their Guns,” by James Q. Wilson, Collins Professor of Management and Public Policy at the University of California at Los Angeles, the author shows what is wrong with each side of the argument. In the first paragraph, he says, “The president wants still tougher gun control legislation and thinks it will work” (Barnet and Bedau 124). But, he continues on to say how this will not affect the illegal use of guns. About 200 million privately own a gun and one-third of that 200 million own a handgun (Barnet and Bedau 124). Only two percent of the citizens are using them in unlawful acts (Barnet and Bedau 124). The number of people who defend themselves outnumbers the amount of arrests for crimes committed. There are many issues with gun control, such as, whether a citizen should be able to own a gun or not, law enforcement confiscations, and punishment for criminals who use guns.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson states that there are too many guns in the country and it will be impossible to remove them all. However, the main issue is not to try to remove all guns but working to reduce the distribution of them. Why is it that people from lower economical statuses have easy access to militant rifles? If there is a reduced distribution of guns there will be a difference in homicide rates even if Wilson disagrees. Wilson states that having gun serves as self defense. (Wilson 2007) Even though he may seem right but many people always claim self defense when it really isn't. For example, Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman case was one of the biggest we ever seen. George followed Trayvon home one night which lead to a scuffle between the two and resulted into Trayvon being shot to death while George claimed self…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New York Times best selling author, radio host, and Fox News contributor, Tammy Bruce, wrote an article called “Why Gun Control Won’t End Mass Murders.” Bruce’s purpose is to inform readers that gun control laws are not going to stop murders from occurring. She adopts a grim tone in order to get her readers to think about why the gun laws are the way they are. For years the government has been trying to enforce gun laws and yet murders rates are not decreasing. Some points Bruce addresses include mass shootings, liberals, and the Mayo Clinc’s statistics towards drugs. Tammy Bruce was not successful in getting her point across.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He inspires change in this article, in hope of extending that to his readers. His use of facts, and a well structured essay make for an overall convincing argument. He does not appear to use much of his own voice or opinions in the paper, helping to make it seem unbiased and more so a speculation and analysis of gun control.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Carrying a concealed handgun could help stop a public shooting spree.” The second amendment and open carry laws give law abiding citizens give those who apply the sense of security, protection, and safety to those who cannot protect themselves. Banning the right to bear arms and the right to openly carry would cause more harm than allowing legal citizens to legally carry firearms for self-defense. Banning guns can cause a major issue in many ways. For example, if you ban public carry of guns, what's gonna happen if a spree shooting takes place in front of you and your unarmed. You have just become a sitting duck. Taking away guns takes away a sense of security for about 11 million citizens trying to protect themselves and their families. “People are safer in states where law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry concealed weapons.” Most parents would do anything to keep their children safe, even give their life for the well-being of their kids. For example, the movie theater shooting in colorado. If a parent and their child were seeing a movie and the parent was armed, they could better their chances to get out alive if they are carrying then sitting and waiting for the police to disarm the criminal. Taking away or not allowing that right to be enacted is increasing the chances of harm more than making the streets safer without guns. “Banning weapons does not guarantee safety.” The saying goes, “A right unexercised, is a right that is lost”…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a good statistic to throw out; it shows that another country is better in some way then the USA, which hits the national pride. He also uses some historical facts to backup his claim. When the United States was established as a country in the eighteenth century there was a need for a militia because the national army was limited to 840 men. People need the guns in order to protect their homes and country. Warren states that because we have such a large military now that there is no need for a militia and less of a need for guns. He believes that we no longer have to protect ourselves from Native Americans, the French, or the British. He uses these points to backup the claim that we need more regulations on gun ownership to decrease the murder rate in the United States. His warrant would be that if there were more regulations on guns in America then the murder rate would decrease.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to an article titled (Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?) written by Mallory Simon, writer and senior producer of online presentations for the Cable News Network (CNN) on January 31, 2013, the argument can be presented that “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The article highlighted the common topic of gun control. In that phrase alone it is proposed that somehow guns have a mind of their own and can somehow control themselves. The author presents the proposal that somehow there may be a common ground in maintaining the use and sanction of guns in our country by creating a medium of strict public policy in the form of background checks and security. It is with strong supported evidence that an attempt will be made to argue that the power to control the illegal, malicious and careless use of guns is to limit the power of people to obtain them with a…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is easily linked to the availability of guns. The debate on whether guns are a tradition and a right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution or whether they are a dangerous contribution to the problems at hand make for an explosive argument. With a major outbreak of violence in our country, some people think that if we repeal the Second Amendment it would solve the problem. These people have two reasons; One, is the rising of violence amongst teenagers, the second, is their interpretation of the Second Amendment. The side opposing these views use arguments like how it would be impossible to repeal the Second Amendment, and we have a long history…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Gun Laws Be Strict

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For example, in 2014, there were approximately 2,549 children who died from a gunshot, and 13,576 children who were injured (Gun Violence: Facts and Statistics, 2017). The more guns there are that are lying around homes, the more likely there’s going to be an accident resulting in death, or injury. Guns need to be kept under control to prevent these things. The last reason that there should be stricter gun laws is that right now, people have too easy of access to guns, when they really don’t need them in the first place. There are too many people who have guns just because they can, and most of those guns are lying around the house where almost anyone could get ahold of them (Bush, 2015). It is important to limit their access to guns so we can prevent these things from happening. In order for a U.S citizen to drive a car, they must pass a test proving they are capable of driving a vehicle safely. If they don’t pass the test, they are not able to drive a car. The same should go for guns. People should have to prove that they are going to be safe and responsible with a gun; guns shouldn’t just be handed over (Bush,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No matter how many laws you make, or even if they ban guns, they will always be and issue that we can’t escape from. Guns have been part of the American culture for to long to just take them away. Many different turning points for the worse in gun related violence could be stopped by concealed carry. Gang violence would lessen with just more restrictions on who can own a firearm and possess one, that is simply just our government paying more money into stopping the weapons from getting into the wrong hands. I also covered why semi automatic weapons are a good thing and aren’t just for the worst cases, a person with the intent to kill will still kill, regardless of the rounds he is able to fire in a certain amount of time. The point of this whole essay is to get through to people that criminals don’t listen to laws, but law-abiding citizens do. My hope is that this essay changed you point of view for the better, and that you now understand that guns are not such a bad thing after all. Like Justin Moore says in his song “Guns”, as long as I’m alive, they won’t take my…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most debatable topics in the United States is the availability of guns. The debate on the topic of gun laws focuses on those who believe that owning guns is a Constitutional right while others believe that owning guns is a leading cause of much of the violence within the United States. However, there is a balance between the two debates that will lead to a better conclusion to the topic. Making guns illegal will only lead to criminals possessing illegal firearms while the law abiding citizens will be faced with the threat of criminals with firearms while they have no source of protection. At the same time, the current laws do not require every state to follow laws that would allow for the government to ensure that the firearms do not legally fall into the hands of criminals or those not responsible to own firearms.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics