Preview

Julius Ceasar Assassination Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Ceasar Assassination Research Paper
Throughout history, there have been many dictators who have ruled with an iron fist. Julius Ceasar of Rome, Joseph Stalin of Russia, Nicolea Ceausescu or Romania, and Adolf Hitler of Germany were - to name a few - famous dictators. Dictators rule countries with absolute power, taking away the rights and choices of citizens. Most would argue that the assassination of a dictator is a good, justifiable thing to do, and I find myself agreeing. Yet, despite dictators' unrighteous actions, there are some who still argue against getting rid of oppressive leaders.

If a dictator is killed, many deaths could be prevented. The killing would be for the greater good. Who wouldn't go back in time to kill Hitler? Thousands of lives would …show more content…
During World War Two, Hitler's own generals plotted the Führer's downfall. These attempts were very close to being successful, but for a spy within the conspiracy. Even Joseph Stalin, the "Man of Steel", was not immune to traitors within his Polit Bureau. Julius Ceasar himself was killed by his assosciates and supposed best friend after declaring himself dictator for life.

When these people seize power, they are determined to hold on to it through fair means or foul. Their assassination may be the only way to change a country from dictatorship to democracy, particularly if an internal police force under the leader's rule has been upholding his or her will and preventing internal opposition.

A popular arguement against the assassination of a dictator is that there is an alternative to being them to justice. The leaders can be put on trial, and be held responsible for their crimes. The International Criminal Court provides a permanent means to go about this, and acts as a deterent against anyone taking complete control. Slobodan Milosevic was able to be put on trial for his deeds, and Saddam Hussein faced justice in Iraq. However, this alternative method would allow the dictator to be in power for longer, and they would still have some power. Not all trials are fair, and the dictator may escape justice, and continue as they were. The attempt could also make them look untouchable, or even
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Character Analysis: The Assassination Of Julius Caesar
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Character Analysis: The Assassination Of Julius Caesar

    To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Ceasar's Civil War
    • 57 Words
    • 1 Page

    Julius Ceasar's Civil War

    Ceasar`s civil war.In 49BC,Julius Ceasar found himself at a crossroad.The great general was fresh off a stunning military compaign in Gaul,but his longtime alliance with pompey the great had turned into a bitter rivalry.With pompey dead ,Ceasars victory was all but secured.The at roman civil war also known as Ceasars civil war,was one of the last…

    • 57 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Killing Adolf Hitler in Wwii Is an Acceptable Choice to Ending the War with Germany
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Killing Adolf Hitler in Wwii Is an Acceptable Choice to Ending the War with Germany

    Assassination attempts on Adolf Hilter during World War II were unsuccessful. However, it was the belief of many Allied leaders that this would effectively end the propaganda machine of Nazi Germany. Eliminating Adolf Hitler would effectively end the war with Germany and, thus, assassination attempts were considered a viable option. In particular, should one have been successful, it might have saved many lives and needless casualties in the quest to end the war. Hitler's suicide marks a huge event in history. When leaders fall, their regime often falls with them. Hitler had a regime that can really only be described as evil. We had to do everything we could to stop that. Assassination is not always a justifiable action, but in this situation, it certainly was. The use of assassination as a means to end a war should only be used against those individuals who are the most inhumane and unreasonable. If there is no other way to stop their mass killings of other human beings, I believe assassination is a viable option. If Hitler had been assassinated early on, it might have even prevented World War 2. And it was clearly his naked aggression that was the causus belli. I would not normally support the assassination of freely-elected heads of state, but this situation was so stark and so rife with the prospect of giant-scale warfare that one man's killing would have been morally justifiable. It's clearly for the greater good to kill one man if that would mean saving millions from a similar fate. From both a legal and a moral standpoint, I think the assassination of Hitler would have been justifiable. While ideally, he could have gone through our legal system and then been punished, it was well known how evasive he was and how capable he was of planning an escape. Capturing him alive was probably not a viable option. He should have been assassinated so he was unable to harm anyone else. it might not have stopped the war, but it would have saved millions…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Research Paper
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Research Paper

    The Republican period of Roman history began in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan kings was dropped. The Republic was controlled by the Senate, which was an assembly by dominated upper-class families. This dominance by the aristocracy led to tensions between the social classes, especially among the lower classes who fought for equality in both the economy and the government. Despite these inner struggles, Rome's military power strengthened throughout the 5th and 4th centuries BCE and by 270 BCE they commanded the entire peninsula. 264 BCE brought the beginning of the three Punic Wars fought against Carthage over control of the western Mediterranean. These resulted in victories for Rome which granted them access to the wealth of Greece, Egypt,…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Is Hitler's Assassination Justified
    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Is Hitler's Assassination Justified

    Hitler’s reign was one of the worst things to happen in history. At the time many people were afraid of putting him to a stop; even so, a few brave souls attempted to assassinate him. His ideas were inhuman and many things he did were crazy. He was a callous man. There were many assassination attempts and Hitler never got severely hurt, near the end of the war people began to think he was invincible. Contrary to what many may think, assassination attempts were a needed repeating theme for Adolf Hitler due to his unethical thoughts and ideas; most of the attempts made were planned out well, but they had a few minor mistakes resulting in his continued plans and the death of millions.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Assassination Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Assassination Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    Mark Antony twisted the “dagger” of Caesar’s death ever so slightly and then threatened to unleash them on the Senators. But Caesar had named his grandnephew Gaius Octavius his sole heir. Octavius, who came into rule when he was 18, became Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus or Octavian, the son of the great Caesar. “While Antony dealt with Decimus Brutus in the first round of the new civil wars, Octavian consolidated his tenuous…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast Julius Ceasar essay
    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and contrast Julius Ceasar essay

    The leader of Rome is dead, and two men have completely different opinions as to what has happened to him. Brutus, his right hand man, says that he had to be killed due to his excessive ambition. While Antony states that he was brutally murdered by the people who called themselves his friends. But only one of the two stood out, they were so believable and convincing that it was hard to believe anyone other than him. And this speech was given by Antony. He gave an incredibly convincing speech, making the people of Rome completely look past the words of Brutus by sparking different emotions in them. But at the same time he was very careful and precise with his words which helped to protect him from the conspirators who murdered Caesar.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Valkyrie
    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Valkyrie

    I watched “Valkyrie,” starring Tom Cruise, a movie that depicts the plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler during the height of World War II. It brings to light the events leading up to the assassination, as well as its aftermath. The failed July 20th attempt led to the execution of around 5,000 Germans, ordered by Hitler. Although World War II was not impacted very heavily by it, the war certainly would have been had the attempt been successful. Because of the armistice that would have been signed, nine months of war could have been avoided and hundreds of thousands of lives could have been salvaged. The attempt shows the world that not all Nazis were evil; some followed their conscience rather than Hitler’s orders. People should either watch the movie or research about the attempt; they need to know how brave the conspirators were and how much they were willing to sacrifice for the greater good. Of the fifteen assassination attempts made on the Fuhrer, this one came the closest to succeeding.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why Alexander How Great Was A Dictator
    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Why Alexander How Great Was A Dictator

    The first reason Alexander was a dictator, is because he took way too many lives.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Assassination And Impeachment
    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Assassination And Impeachment

    In modern times, if a political figure is deemed unfit to oversee his or her duties, they are removed from office. Although impeachment appears to be vastly different from the act of assassination, Russ Baker, CEO of whowhatwhy.org argues that, “Assassination and impeachment have long been closely tied, as both involve the removal of a leader outside of elections. (Baker 14)” This statement is proven to be true in the case of Julius Caesar, whose long list of wrongdoings eventually lead to his assassination on the Ides of March. Caesar was killed by a group of some 60-odd Roman Senators who stabbed him to death. The assassination of Julius Caesar was just due to the fact that he was a vengeful tyrant that became much too powerful after…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Conspiracy Of Julius Caesar's Death
    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Conspiracy Of Julius Caesar's Death

    The conspiracy of Julius Caesars death was based off of emotions and logic. Because Brutus , He was willing to kill his friend because he wanted to be the emperor of Rome. Also persuaded people to believe that just so he could take the thrown which was based off emotions because he wanted the thrown for his own good.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Macbeth and Stalin
    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Macbeth and Stalin

    The great American President Abraham Lincoln said “Nearly all men can stand adversity but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power” (Lincoln). Abraham Lincoln explained that hardships are a part of man’s life and many great achievements are attained by overcoming the difficulties faced in our lifetime. However, the test of man’s character comes through the handling of power. A righteous and moral man wills not exploit its power as opposed to corrupt leader who will pursue his self-interests by misusing his power. Such assumptions can be made with the ruthless and mass murderer dictator, Joseph Stalin and the cruel tyrant from Shakespeare play Macbeth. Joseph Stalin is known as the most merciless and murderous dictator in history. While ruling the soviet USSR for quarter of the century his regime caused many deaths of innocent people and prominent political members. From 1924 onwards, he executed many political members most notable Lenin’s heir, Leon Leon Trotsky whom he had him expelled from Soviet Union and assassinated in Mexico. In 1952-1953, he arrested many doctors, mostly Jewish on charging them as conspiratorial assassins of Soviet Leaders. Similarly, Macbeth was a brutal tyrant who committed regicide to become the king and perform further murderous acts to stay in authoritative position. Both oppressive dictators perform treacherous sins for their greed of power. This ultimately results in both leaders attaining power through wrong intentions, following corruption and paranoid state of mind during their regime. However Joseph Stalin’s cunning and intellectual skills led him into power till his death; on the other hand, Macbeth's impulsiveness led to his lack of control and eventually death.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dictator and Austin Nguyen Richardson
    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dictator and Austin Nguyen Richardson

    Not all of the time because if the dictator were to be non-corrupt and able to defend and help his people it wouldn’t lead to chaos. The main time a dictator is preferable lead into chaos is when he uses his powers for the wrong intentions such as Hilter. Hitler abused his power and used it to kill hundreds of thousands of…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Non Violent Revolutions
    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Non Violent Revolutions

    Violence against violence is only the most logical way to expel overpowering executives. Government has used brutality to keep their citizens “in check” since the beginning of time. Violence is natural to humans. Humanity has always known this concept of cruelty and it is impossible to avoid. Karl Peter Heinzen was a notable author who wrote a pamphlet advocating violent revolutions. The pamphlet emphasized the use of violence to allow change in government. Avoiding the use of cruelty and barbarity will result in avoiding a future where real change is enabled everywhere in society (Heinzen 10). The reality is humanity is shaped by brute force. By avoiding violence, the citizens are avoiding a different and better future. Violent revolutions should be considered legitimate because totalitarian governments are allowed to get away with “legal” murder everyday. The inhabitants are just guarding themselves from the ferocious regimes. Karl Heinzen’s pamphlet also argues the legitimacy of violent revolutions. “It was my object to vindicate not only the aims of revolution, but also its means, including assassination and to render it as legitimate as the tyrants have done with their murder by war, their ‘legal’ murder, their murder by ‘court-martial’” (Heinzen 12). Violent governments have always used “legal” murder to control their citizens. The…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Debate - That this house would assassinate dictators
    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Debate - That this house would assassinate dictators

    The utilitarian justification for assassination lies in the many deaths and much suffering potentially prevented if just one man or woman is killed. The greater good demands a single evil act is done, especially if it would avert the immediate and certain danger of much worse evil. Oppressive, tyrannical dictators who sustain their own power through fear have no legitimacy. Who now wouldn't wish that Hitler had been killed in 1933? Or Pol Pot in 1970? The casualties directly inflicted as a result of their misguided policies could have been avoided. As a last resort therefore, assassination stands as a 'permissible means to a…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics