Preview

Internationalb Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Internationalb Theory
International Relations : Important Theories a) Realism/ Realist b) Liberalism/ Liberals c) Marxism
Realism makes four basic assumptions about international relations: * The state is the most important actor in international relations. This means that national governments are the most important player in the game of international politics--interest groups like Amnesty International or individual figures like the pope have no effect on how nations relate to one another. * The state is a unitary and rational actor. Unitary means that "the state speaks with one voice;" although members of a nation may have many different views on the best approach to a situation, only one approach will be enacted. Rational means that the state is capable of "identifying goals and preferences and determining their relative importance." * International relations are essential conflictual because of anarchy. In this case, anarchy does not mean chaos--instead it refers to the absence of a higher authority to prevent aggression or arbitrate disputes. Just as men might run amok and attack one another without the government to punish them, nations will attack one another so long as they believe it in their best interest. Anarchy also compels states to arm themseves in order to feel secure. The stockpiling of arms and the building of a military, however, are provocative actions which prompt neighbouring states to feel insecure and build up their own weapons. * Security and strategic issues, known as high politics, dominate the international agenda. This means that states' paramount goal is to maximize their power in the international community, and that they are primarily concerned with military power. An example of a nation operating according to this maxim is North Korea in the early 90s--the downfall of the Soviet Union left them without Communist allies, so they began a nuclear weapons development program and threw out UN observers. They believed that if

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Finding the Middle Ground

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The origin of today’s political system dates back to 1648 at the creation of the Peace of Westphalia. After years of living under feudal systems, a treaty was formed that granted sovereignty to nation-states, and thus, organized a political anarchic system that still exists today. Due to the system’s lack of a World Order, nation-states must make decisions that will protect their sovereignty within the anarchy, which therefore, contributes to the extremely competitive nature of world politics.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    International decision making enables superpowers to make key decisions about the world economy, conflicts or environmental issues. This power is mainly held in the hands of inter-governmental organisations (IGO’s) some IGOs involve all nations, such as the U.N., whereas others are more exclusive such as the G8, or regional such as NATO. These IGO’s are important for superpowers to maintain their status as it allows them to focus global policy and decision making in their own interest. For example most IGO’s operate a veto voting system, where if a certain country with veto does not agree to the policy then the vote is not carried out. Many superpowers use this to their advantage, for example the EU and the USA tend to vote with each other, giving them the opportunity to block policies they do not agree with, therefore allowing them to force their own policies. This makes it difficult for smaller nations with less power to have a role in international decision making.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    world order essay

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nation states play a significant role in the promotion and enforcement of World Order. The nation states, through compliance with international law and multilateralism retain a significant impact in the enforcement and maintenance of the idealistic notion of World Order, defined as the sole existence of global peace and stability and an absence of conflict. However, state sovereignty and a lack of political will can ultimately impede on the effective enforcement of World Order. Nonetheless, as highlighted by the international humanitarian intervention in March 2011, nation states play a pivotal role in achieving world order.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    States in the international system act according to national interest, seeking to obtain possessions that will grant them more power over other competing states. Since there is no supreme ruling authority in the international system, states are encouraged to maximize their power via other states to become the hegemon. States often hold possessions that are praised and highly coveted by their rivals. These possessions can include territory, natural resources or other valuable items that could increase the power of rival states. A state that has highly desired possessions is not always willing to give up or compromise their valued possessions to other states, which can in turn cause tensions between states for control over the assets. Tensions for commonly desired assets frequently lead to war, and since all states follow the logic that taking advantage of others will secure that others do not take advantage of them. With logic like this, war will sometimes seem like a rational choice to make when confronted with the idea that otherwise others will take advantage of them. The unequal amount of power held…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the midst of this, states are constantly battling to shout intentions and read intentions among a cacophony of messages. In this forum acquiring weapons is the most sensible course of action, and as Schelling emphasizes, the nuclear option allows for the “diplomacy of violence.” The mere threat of force is a poignant example of the effects of anarchy, and state attempts to balance power.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) Neo-realism, also known as structural realism see international politics as a power struggle between states. Conflicts between states and security competition are due to a lack of “an overarching authority above states and the relative distribution of power in the international system” (Dunne 98). Scholar Kenneth Waltz defined the structure of the international system in three elements: organizing principle, differentiation of units, and distribution of capabilities. To structural realists the distribution of capabilities gives important insight to grasping international outcomes, and the relative distribution of power in the international system is the strategic variable to understanding such outcomes. Structural realists argue that the number of great powers that exists concludes the structure of the international system. Waltz describes the structure as the “ordering principle of the international system, which is anarchy and the distribution capabilities across units, which are states” (Dunne 127). Neo-realists also believe the structure of the international system shapes all foreign policy choices and see power as the collective competences of the states. In other words the more power a state has in the international system the more influence they have on world affairs. However the flaw that accompanies neo-realism, is the increase of the application of “self-help”, a.k.a. increase of military security. Neo-liberalist agrees largely with the views and beliefs of neo-realists, “the anarchic international structure, the centrality of states, and a rationalist approach to social scientific inquiry” (Dunne 115). The main difference between the two theories is neo-liberalist believe that anarchy does not mean the arrangements of cooperation are impossible. International regimes are the implementer for cooperation. Arguments made by neo-liberalists believe that academic inquiry is guided by…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power Politics Summary

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This chapter describes the international environment as anarchic, evidently lacking a centralized authority capable of creating order among the nation states of the world. As a result, nations have to behave under the principle of self-help, ensuring their own security due to the absence of said centralized authority to defend them from outside threats. This inference to the cause of conflict can be characterized as congruent with the realist point of view. In the absence of international authority, nations assume that they are under threat of exploitation by other nations, and must thus employ strategies to ensure their wellbeing. This is consistent with the realist idea of the inevitability of social conflict. All nations will self-help because of the assumption that in some time in the future, conflict with other nations will arise, and they must be prepared for it.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The author’s purpose was to make the point of the importance of state in politics. He goes on to show that non-state actors can also play a big role in event that happen. Besides nations he tells that besides nations, classes and agents are other key groups.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Concert of Power (Cop)

    • 6342 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Even though we tend to not recognize it, today’s world is in peril: While the number and type of actors has multiplied in the process of globalization, great powers retain their dominant role in international security. The central element of global security governance, the one factor that presents a road fork between the paths to peace and to war and which also is a precondition to successful management of several other important issues, thus concerns the relations between the major powers. If they cooperate, global security governance becomes a viable opportunity. If they don’t, security cooperation is impossible and the likelihood of major violent conflicts will rise.…

    • 6342 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    vibrant world. For states to remain in the game, they need to understand they are no longer the only actor. The current policy arena is…

    • 4826 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    essay

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Strictly defined, the field of international relations (IR) concerns the relationships among the world`s goverments. But these relationships cannot be understood in isolation. They as closely connected with other actors (such as international organizations. multinational corporations, and indiciduals); with other social structures (including economics, culture, and demostic politics); and with geographical and historical influences .IR is a large subject that overlaps several other fields.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    T rying to have more power than all other states. According to Waltz, this competition for power among states is not always as dangerous as it at first sounds.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Are these persons who are acting on behalf of a governmental body, which prohibit the federal and state governments from violating certain rights and freedoms. Also includes the individual leader as well as bureaucratic organizations (such as foreign ministries) that act in the name of the state.…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    International Relations

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The branch of political science that is concerned with the foreign affairs of and relations among countries. International relations is an academic discipline concerned with the interactions among nations and other international entities.…

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    international relations

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages

    International relations (IR) is the study of relationships among countries, the roles of sovereign states, inter-governmental organizations (IGO),international non-governmental organizations (INGO), non-governmental organizations (NGO), and multinational corporations (MNC). International relations is an academic and a public policy field, and so can be positive and normative, because it analyzes and formulates the foreign policy of a given State. As political activity, international relations dates from the time of the Greek historian Thucydides (ca. 460–395 BC), and, in the early 20th century, became a discrete academic field (No. 5901 in the 4-digit UNESCO Nomenclature) within political science. However, International Relations is an interdisciplinary field of study.[2]…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays