Is Globalisation A Threat To Nation Sta
WBSO
GLOBALIZATION
AND STATE-BUILDING
NIKOLA LAKIĆ
Is globalization a challenge or a threat to nation-states as a dominant form of polity?
WESTERN BALKANS SECURITY OBSERVER
Nikola Lakić1
1
BAMERC - Balkan and Middle East regional Cooperation
Scientific article
August 2011
UDK: 321.8 ; 316.334.2/.3
Abstract
Contact: nl023@yahoo.com
A true Nation-state has never yet existed in our diverse and vibrant world. For states to remain in the game, they need to understand they are no longer the only actor. The current policy arena is a kind of unstructured complexity in which a lot of actors are key for policy making. The descriptive label governance is used for the changing nature of the policy process. The dispersion of the power and activities of the state towards stakeholders at different spatial levels is the most visible change in the state, in a globalized world.
The thesis about the end of the state is unsustainable. According to
Poulantzas, a nation-state should be seen as ‘self-replaceable’.
Economic globalization is seen as the force which most threatens the authority of the nation-state. The state 's ability to act in opposition to market forces is devastated by the fact that the state must reduce regulatory standards in order to attract capital. The theory which satisfactorily reflects the nexus of globalization and reduction of regulatory policy is the ‘race-to-the-bottom’ (RTB) hypothesis. In today’s globalized states, there is a trend towards subordinating social policy to the needs of structural competitiveness and the flexibility of the labour market. Such a state is called a
Schumpeterian workfare post-national regime. Globalization causes the state to be unable to protect its population. Contemporary security threats and challenges, which are by nature transnational and largely a product of globalization, make nation-states vulnerable and interdependent. The result of globalization is also new nonspace-based identities that do not derive from the
GLOBALIZATION
AND STATE-BUILDING
NIKOLA LAKIĆ
Is globalization a challenge or a threat to nation-states as a dominant form of polity?
WESTERN BALKANS SECURITY OBSERVER
Nikola Lakić1
1
BAMERC - Balkan and Middle East regional Cooperation
Scientific article
August 2011
UDK: 321.8 ; 316.334.2/.3
Abstract
Contact: nl023@yahoo.com
A true Nation-state has never yet existed in our diverse and vibrant world. For states to remain in the game, they need to understand they are no longer the only actor. The current policy arena is a kind of unstructured complexity in which a lot of actors are key for policy making. The descriptive label governance is used for the changing nature of the policy process. The dispersion of the power and activities of the state towards stakeholders at different spatial levels is the most visible change in the state, in a globalized world.
The thesis about the end of the state is unsustainable. According to
Poulantzas, a nation-state should be seen as ‘self-replaceable’.
Economic globalization is seen as the force which most threatens the authority of the nation-state. The state 's ability to act in opposition to market forces is devastated by the fact that the state must reduce regulatory standards in order to attract capital. The theory which satisfactorily reflects the nexus of globalization and reduction of regulatory policy is the ‘race-to-the-bottom’ (RTB) hypothesis. In today’s globalized states, there is a trend towards subordinating social policy to the needs of structural competitiveness and the flexibility of the labour market. Such a state is called a
Schumpeterian workfare post-national regime. Globalization causes the state to be unable to protect its population. Contemporary security threats and challenges, which are by nature transnational and largely a product of globalization, make nation-states vulnerable and interdependent. The result of globalization is also new nonspace-based identities that do not derive from the
Bibliography: 1. Bleses, P. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2004) The Dual Transformation of the German Welfare State 2. Čaušević, F. (2004) ‘Finansijska globalizacija i ekonomski suverenitet’, Sociologija, Vol. XLVI, No.1, str. 71-95. 3. Ćirić, J. (2008) ‘Suverenitet u savremeno doba’. Filozofija i društvo 1, str.191-216. 4. Drezner, D. (2001) ‘Globalization and Policy Convergence’. International Studies Association, pp 5. Grande, E. (2002) ‘Od nacionalne države do transnacionalnoga režima politike-državna upravljačka sposobnost u globalizacijskome razdoblju’. 6. Fulcher, J. (2000) ‘Globalisation, the nation-state and global society’. The sociological review, str 7. Greve, B. (2006) The future of the Welfare State:European and Global perspectives. Aldershot:Ashgate. 8. Habermas, J. (2001) ‘Evropska nacionalna država pod pritiskom globalizacije’. Nova srpska politička misao, vol.VII, no. 3-4, str. 139-153. 9. Hiks, S. (2007) Politički sistem Evropske unije. Belgrade: Službeni glasnik. 10. Jakšić, M. (1997) ‘Globalizacija i javna politika’. Poslovni krug, decembar, str 11. Jessop, B.(2000) ‘Globalization and the National State’. Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, pp 12. Keating, M. (2001) Plurinational Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press 13. Kennett P.(2008) Introduction: governance, the state and public policy in a global age 14. Kovač, O. (2009) ’Uzroci i mogući koncepti rešavanja svetske finansijske krize’ 16. Klamer, C. (2009) ’Blending Identities’. Lund University, Department of Political Science, STVM01, pp. 1-23. 17. Laffey M. and Weides J. (2005) Policing and global governance. In: M. Barnett and R. Duvall, Power in Global Governance. Cambridge University Press, pp 18. Mandelbaum, M. (2004) Ideje koje su osvojile svet. Belgrade: Filip Višnjić. 19. McBride S., McNutt K., Williams R. (2007) Tracking Neo-Liberalism: Labour Market .Policies in the OECD Area 20. Mitelman, Dž. (2003) Dinamika globalizacije. In: V. Vuletić (prir.), Globalizacija: Mit ili stvarnost, Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, str. 21. Mosley, L. (2005) ‘Globalisation and the State: Still Room to Move?.’ New Political Economy 10, No 22. Moreno, E. (1990) Kako misliti Evropu.Sarajevo:Svjetlost. 23. Pečujlić, M. (2001) ’Planetarni Kentaur: dva lika globalizacije’. Nova srpska politička misao, vol.VII, no 24. Price-Smith, A.T. (2009) Contagion and chaos. Cambridge, Massachushetts:The MIT Press. 25. Prodi, R. (2002) Moja Evropa. Belgrade: BMG. 26. Ripsman, N.M. and Paul, T.V. (2010) Globalization and the National Security State. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 27. Rixen, T. (2008) The Political Economy of International Tax Governance. 28. Sasen, S. (2008) Utelovljenje globalnog u nacionalnom. In: P. Bojanić and I. 31. Tufvesson, J.(2005) ‘The Rise of a New Elite’. Lunds universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, STV004, pp.1-31. 32. Volf, M. (2003) Da li će nacionalne države preživeti globalizaciju. In: V. 33. Wells, B. Sherrill and Wells, F. Samuel (2008) ‘Shared Sovereignty in the European Union’ 15. Krasner, S. (2007) ’Podela suvereniteta’. Nova srpska politička misao, vol.XV, no