Preview

Insanity Defense

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1716 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Insanity Defense
For years, the insanity defense has developed and turned into a difficult but sometime successful defense system in a court of law. The exact law changes from state to state however the main idea remains the same. The insanity defense could apply or be used on a person who is considered legally insane. They must have a severe mental disease or defect and must prove they were at the time of the crime, legally insane. Also said person has to prove they didn’t know the impact, quality or the nature of their act or acts (The Insanity). The insanity defense has been a controversial subject for years and years. One of the main reasons for this controversy is the inability for lawmakers to decide on a solid legal definition of insane. There are countless standards of insane; each court has used different interpretations of the term insane. One of the first serious attempts to define insane legally was in 1843. This occurred due to the M'Naghten case. Daniel M'Naghten was charged with the attempted assassination of Prime Minister Robert Peel. As a paranoid schizophrenic, M'Naghten was found not guilty and had set a rule for the insanity defense. This rule declared it was not right to hold a person legally accountable for unlawful actions committed while afflicted with a mental disorder(The M’Naghten). This disorder must prevent the person from understanding what he or she is doing and must also prevent them from comprehending that their conduct is wrong. Over time this idea was seen as too lenient and not structured enough. About 40 years later, in Alabama Supreme Court, the “irresistible impulse test” was formed. This law said those who wished to plead not guilty by reason of insanity had to demonstrate that they could not control their actions and behaviors when their crimes were committed (A Brief History). On some occasions the defendant does not have to match all of the descriptions of insane to plea insanity. For instance, John Hinckley was the man who tried to


Bibliography: American Civil Liberties Union. "Mentally Ill Offenders Should Not Be Executed." Crime and Criminals. Ed. James D. Torr. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 21 Nov. 2010. Chiacchia, Kenneth B. "Insanity Defense - Insanity Defense Statistics, Problems with NGRI, Guilty but Mentally Ill Read More: Insanity Defense - Insanity Defense Statistics, Problems with NGRI, Guilty but Mentally Ill." Net Industries, 2010. Web. 1 Nov. 2010. . Google, By. "A Brief History of the Insanity Plea." EzineArticles Submission - Submit Your Best Quality Original Articles For Massive Exposure, Ezine Publishers Get 25 Free Article Reprints. 2010. Web. 1 Nov. 2010. . "Hinckley." LII | Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School. Web. 16 Nov. 2010. . "Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity." Free Legal Forms | Free Legal Documents | Legal Resources. Web. 15 Nov. 2010. . "The "M 'Naghten Rule" - Criminal Law." Criminal Law Center - Criminal Law. Web. 15 Nov. 2010. . Vatz, Richard E. "Mentally Ill Offenders Should Be Held Responsible for Their Actions." Crime and Criminals. Ed. James D. Torr. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 21 Nov. 2010.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense
    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case
    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense
    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense

    The Insanity defense first came into England’s radar when Daniel McNaughton, who attempted to murder, Prime Minister Robert Peel. McNaughton Rule became a common law test to determine criminal liability in relation to mentally disturbed defendants. Another notable case is that of Reagan, John Hinckley who in 1981 attempted to assassinate the president.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    The insanity defense is only raised in 1% of cases and then only successful 25% of the time it is used; although its rarity, the legal court has very detailed rules. Most rules describe not guilty by reason of insanity as not being aware of what you were doing in that exact moment. Adam Banner suggests that the Eddie Routh case had an accurate ruling of guilty because of his claim that, “...the disposition is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. It is not ‘not guilty by reason of mental illness’,”. Only Mental Health America would disagree, stating, “The Court has indicated that states may be required to provide at least some minimal defense based on mental illness,”. Coincidently, these changes have not been made thus…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crazy: a Father's Search Through America's Mental Healthy Madness - Annotated Bibliography
    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crazy: a Father's Search Through America's Mental Healthy Madness - Annotated Bibliography

    Doyle, Jim, and Peter Fimrite. "Caring for Mentally Ill Criminals Outside of Prison Is Dangerous." America's Prisons. Ed. Clare Hanrahan. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Criminally Insane Taking over State Hospitals." San Francisco Chronicle 22 July 2001. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 26 Feb. 2013.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Week 6 - Psy 270 Checkpoint Mind over Matter
    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Week 6 - Psy 270 Checkpoint Mind over Matter

    When we apply the labels ‘mental illness’ and ‘schizophrenic mental disorder to a person, it does not necessarily mean, from a legal standpoint that this person does not know right from wrong. What this term would include would be things like mental deficiencies, like when a person would suffer form hallucinations or other mental diseases and retardation. “In M'Naghten's modern form, a defendant who pleads insanity must prove that at the time of the offense he or she was suffering from a mental disease or disability, such as retardation, so severely as not to know either "the nature and quality of the act" or whether it was right or wrong” (Gibeaut, 2006). So if this person who committed this crime did not understand the crimes consequences, and did not know the difference between right and wrong, this would fall under M'Naghten's rule. In order for someone to use that insanity defense, these aspects had to be present. From the original rule to now, it has been shortened legally to not knowing right from wrong. As far as alcohol cases go; this person knows right form wrong, but because they are intoxicated from alcohol, they acted in a ‘diminished capacity”; they however were not acting out of mental disease.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Theme Of Insanity In Poe's The Tell-Tale Heart
    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Theme Of Insanity In Poe's The Tell-Tale Heart

    “ Insanity means madness; mental illness (Intermediate Dictionary, pg. 451)”. According to recent insanity plea statistics, there has been a significant increase in insanity defense cases across country. In Edgar Allan Poe’s Short story, “ The Tell Tale Heart “, the narrator is insane because he kills the old man , he gets annoyed by his own heart beat , and he was paranoid.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ohio Insanity Case Analysis
    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ohio Insanity Case Analysis

    This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Insanity Plea
    • 705 Words
    • 1 Page

    Insanity Plea

    The insanity plea has existed at least since ancient Greece and Rome and dates back to…

    • 705 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense
    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Should Insanity Defense Be Eliminated
    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Should Insanity Defense Be Eliminated

    Harris, M. (2013, January 14). Insanity plea repeated. In The Baltimore Sun . Retrieved March…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense

    And often the cases involving an insanity plea gets the most attention because they involve crime that are bizarre within themselves. On February 22, 2016 an article name “Maryland Mom Found Not Responsible in Boy Death in Swing” was release. This article shares with us that Simms was found not responsible in her son’s death. Simms was found pushing her son in a park swing for 40 hours until he died from hypothermia and dehydration. “She was then ruled not criminally responsible, Maryland's equivalent to not guilty by reason of insanity.”(Ahn) She was later found not responsible since she was declare to have schizophrenia. She was ruled not to be a danger to the community and was freed on a conditional release.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dead or Alive: the Criminally Insane
    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dead or Alive: the Criminally Insane

    Mental illness is defined as “Any of various conditions characterized by impairment of an individual’s normal cognitive, emotional, or behavioral functioning, and caused by social, psychological, biochemical, genetic, or other factors, such as infection or head trauma” (thefreedictionary.com). A defendant charged with a crime may present the court with an insanity plea. Upon application of the insanity plea, the defendant must be psychologically evaluated. A common test that is used for this evaluation is called the M’Naghten rules. These rules state that “it must be clearly proved that at the time of committing the act the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or as not to know that what he was doing was wrong” (bailii.org). In using this defence the accused may receive a verdict of “guilty but mentally ill,” which means the accused party may still receive the death penalty. It is extremely rare that an individual using the insanity plea defence gets acquitted.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Not Guilty: Horrest Insanity
    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not Guilty: Horrest Insanity

    Many people wrongly believe that there are only two ways to plead in trial, guilty and not guilty. There is also another way to plead, that most people use to try and escape any criminal responsibility, pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. Not guilty by reason of insanity refers to the defense of offenders not to deny the commission of the crime, but to assert they lacked the capacity to understand the nature of the crime or that it was wrong (Allen). The definition of pleading legally insane can differ from each state, country or jurisdiction. This is usually abused and pleaded wrongly. Therefore it is very difficult to be found not guilty this way. A study carried out in the USA found that the insanity defense is only used in about 1% of all court cases and is only successful in about 26% of those cases (New York Times). The jury must discover if the plea were true or not based on extreme psychiatric testimonies and usually lengthy trials. A prime example of this is in the murder of Elena Steinberg, also known as the sleepwalk murder. In this murder Steven Steinberg was found not guilty on reasons of temporary insanity.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics