Preview

Impeachment of Renato Corona

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Impeachment of Renato Corona
Impeachment of Renato Corona
Renato Corona, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines was impeached on December 12, 2011. Corona was the third official, after President Joseph Estrada on 2000 and Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez earlier on 2011, to be impeached by the House of Representatives.
Corona was perceived as an ally of former president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, who had appointed him as chief justice of the Supreme Court, days after the 2010 presidential election. This comes after the Supreme Court ruled that the president's ban on appointments does not extend to the judiciary. Since then, the Supreme Court has been accused of ruling unfavorably of the Aquino administration in cases concerning Arroyo.
The Senate, which had already convened as an impeachment court, began the trial on January 16, 2012. This is the second impeachment trial in history, as Gutierrez resigned prior to the trial.
On the December 12, 2011 flag-raising ceremony at the Supreme Court, Corona revealed that there was "a secret plan to oust me from office by any means, fair or foul." Corona said that he would not resign.[7]
Later in the day, a caucus amongst Aquino's allies in the House of Representative was called. Minority leader Edcel Lagman said that discussion amongst Aquino's allies heightened when the Committee on Justice passed an impeachment case involving Associate Justice Mariano del Castillo on his alleged plagiarism. Lagman further said that if the vote passed, he would question its "legal and factual basis."[8] The deputy presidential spokesperson, on the other hand, stated that the Palace "is not privy to the discussions of the Liberal Party in the House."[9]
At the conclusion of majority bloc's caucus, Committee on Justice Chairman Niel Tupas Jr. presented the impeachment complaint; after the presentation, only two representatives asked for more questions, while an overwhelming majority asked to sign the complaint. He said that there were no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    President Clinton was charged for perjury, obstruction of justice, manipulation of witnesses and abuse of power, and also for engaging in a sexual relationship between the president and Monica Lewinsky. On December 19, 1998 President Clinton was impeach. On February 12, 1999 the Senate voted to remove President Clinton from the presidency. As big surprise for all Americans, President Clinton was released from all charges that he was accused. The senate voted and the results were " 45 Democrats and 10 Republicans voted" not guilty, Rejecting the first charge of perjury, "and under the obstruction of justice charge, the prosecutor's office required a two-thirds majority to convict, but did not achieve even a simple majority. Senate divided…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clinton Impeachment Trials

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The trial that I am going to tell you about is very different than most other trials. In a way it is 3 or 4 different trials. First there was the Paula Jones case in which Paula Jones sued President Clinton for sexual harassment, and Clinton ended up paying an out of court settlement of $850,000. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones) Then there was the Monica Lewinski scandal with the infamous blue dress. Based on these two scandals The House of Representatives voted to impeach Clinton on 4 articles of impeachment, 2 of them passed. Then there was the Senate trial, where most of the normal trial things the I will be talking about took place. In the end the Senate fall 17 votes short of removing Mr. William Jefferson Clinton from office (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton). This was only the second time that a president has ever been impeached, the other president to be impeached was Andrew Johnson and he was only one vote short of being removed from office. Contrary to popular belief Richard Nixon was not impeached because of the Watergate Scandal, but he knew he faced near certain impeachment and most likely would also be removed from office, so he resigned before he was impeached. It is still not certain when he found out about the scandal. Since the only other time a president was impeached was in 1868 (http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/impeach/impeachmt.htm), the Congress was in a very difficult situation because nothing this had ever happened so the had very few guidlines to base everything off of.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It makes sense that Congress was hesitant about impeaching the president. Impeachment was a new process. Actually, some could consider impeachment to still be a new process in the present day because no president has been fully impeached yet. However, even though impeachment could still be seen as a new process, the checks and balances of present day are more well development. I also hope that if this situation happened in present day, citizens would take a…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    delving into the trials here is a brief description of what impeachment is and how the process…

    • 1835 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    of Representatives on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice. Although he…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The impeachment of President Clinton is something that will be remembered forever. Along with the fact that a presidential impeachment has only happened one other time since the Civil War, the publicity that came with the Clinton trial was extensive (Miller 2004). While the Republican and Democratic members of the House of Representatives had vastly different views on impeaching President Clinton, the fact that only five Democratic Representatives voted to impeach him truly shows how wide that gap was between the two parties. Clinton was impeached on the grounds of perjury to a grand jury and obstruction of justice, with the vote on both articles extremely close, a 228-206 vote on perjury to a grand jury and a 221-212 vote on obstruction of justice (Rozell and Wilcox 1999).…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    5 Minutes Speech

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Fernando Collor de Mello was the first elected president by popular vote after the military regime in 1989. Later, in the early hours of December 30, 1992, by the required two-thirds majority, the Senate found the former President guilty of the charges of impeachment for corruption.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    elpidio quirino

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Riding on the crest of the growing wave of resentment against the Liberal Party, a move was next hatched to indict President Quirino himself.[2] Led by Representative Agripino Escareal a committee, composed of seven members of the House of Representatives, prepared a five-count accusation ranging from nepotism to gross expenditures. Speaker Eugenio Pérez appointed a committee of seven, headed by Representative Lorenzo Sumulong to look into the charges preparatory to their filing with the Senate, acting as an impeachment body. Solicitor General Felix Angelo Bautista entered his appearance as defense counsel for the chief executive.[2] Following several hearings, on April 19, 1949, after a rather turbulent session that lasted all night, the congressional committee reached a verdict completely exonerating the President. Realizing the heavy undertone of politicking behind the move, the exoneration decision was received…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In EDSA I people were protesting about an election fraud supposedly done by Ferdinand Marcos during February 1986. EDSA I lasted five days from February 21-25 1986. Many of Corazon Aquino’s devoted followers were angered because they were not able to vote due to the fact that their names were deleted from the registered voter’s list. Members of the Commission on Election left work because they were offended that Ferdinand Marcos was demanding that he should be the winner. After Ferdinand Marcos left his position, he went to Hawaii.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benigno Aquino

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aquino is a leading member of the Liberal Party. He currently holds the position of Vice Chairman of the Liberal Party, having assumed the post on 17 March 2006. He was previously Secretary General of the party (1999-2002), Vice-President of the Luzon Liberal Party (2002-2004), and Secretary General of the party (2004-16 March 2006).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the issue about the Republic Act No. 9160 ring a bell? Well, if the people followed the former CJ Corona impeachment trial case not very long time ago, then those small terms will not be new to the people’s ears. As a matter of fact, Corona was found guilty. However, not everyone is familiar with this certain Act as not all Filipinos followed the trial closely.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    thank you speech

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On December 18, 2012, President Benigno S. Aquino III appointed Alan La Madrid Purisima as Director General of the Philippine National Police.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tanauan City

    • 3361 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The City of Tanauan (Filipino: Lungsod ng Tanauan) is a second class city in theprovince of Batangas, Philippines. According to the latest census, it has a population of 142,537 inhabitants in 21,912 households. It was incorporated as a city under Republic Act No. 9005, signed on February 2, 2001 and ratified on March 10, 2001.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    judicial branch

    • 11730 Words
    • 47 Pages

    Article 8 - Section 7. (1) No person shall be appointed Member of the Supreme Court or any lower collegiate court unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines. A Member of the Supreme Court must be at least forty years of age, and must have been for fifteen years or more, a judge of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines.(2) The Congress shall prescribe the qualifications of judges of lower courts, but no person may be appointed judge thereof unless he is a citizen of the Philippines and a member of the Philippine Bar. (3) A Member of the Judiciary must be a person of proven competence, integrity, probity, and independence.…

    • 11730 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class Prophecy

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As the appointed chairwoman for the said affair, I was about to leave for work and prepare for one of the busiest and longest day of my life when suddenly the phone rang. It is a call from the president. I have been working in Malacañang for the last two years as the president’s legal adviser. A certified public accountant and lawyer, a career oriented woman who could not wish for anything more – financially stable, supportive family, good social life, with a worthy man to share my future.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays