Preview

judicial branch

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11730 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
judicial branch
Regional Trial Court and other lower courts

Regional Trial Courts (RTC)
Highest “trial courts” in the Philippines.
It was formerly called as the Court of First instance (CFI) before 1980.
It was established in each of the 13 regions in the Philippines.

Qualifications:
Natural-born citizen at least thirty-five years of age and for at least ten years, has been engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines or has held a public office in the Philippines requiring admission to the practice of law as an indispensable requisite
(Based on Batasang Pambansa Blg. 129)

1987 Philippine Constitution
Article 8 - Section 7. (1) No person shall be appointed Member of the Supreme Court or any lower collegiate court unless he is a natural-born citizen of the Philippines. A Member of the Supreme Court must be at least forty years of age, and must have been for fifteen years or more, a judge of a lower court or engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines.(2) The Congress shall prescribe the qualifications of judges of lower courts, but no person may be appointed judge thereof unless he is a citizen of the Philippines and a member of the Philippine Bar. (3) A Member of the Judiciary must be a person of proven competence, integrity, probity, and independence.
Batas Pambansa Blg. 129
Section 17. Appointment and assignment of Regional Trial Judges. – Every Regional Trial Judge shall be appointed to a region which shall be his permanent station, and his appointment shall state the branch of the court and the seat thereof to which he shall be originally assigned. However, the Supreme Court may assign temporarily a Regional Trial Judge to another region as public interest may require, provided that such temporary assignment shall not last longer than six (6) months without the consent of the Regional Trial Judge concerned.
A Regional Trial Judge may be assigned by the Supreme Court to any branch or city or municipality within the same region as public interest



References: www.lawphil.net www.chanrobles.com 1987 Constitution of the Philippines Wikipedia

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ocr Law Unit1 Chapter 5

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Defendants election: if magistrates accept jurisdiction, defendant has the right to choose trial by jury. He should also be informed that if he chooses to be tried at magistrates, they can still send his case to down for sentencing.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S, District Courts are trial courts or courts of original jurisdiction and most federal cases begin here, they hear both civil and criminal cases. The U.S Circuit of Appeal courts are divided into 12 regional circuits and sit in various cities throughout the country. The court of appeals for the federal circuit sits in Washington. If a defendant is fount not guilty in a criminal case and are dissatisfied with the judgment of a U.S. District court may appeal this court in their district to handle his or her case. The U.S Supreme Court sits apex of the federal court system, parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a U.S. Circuit of Appeal or a supreme court can petition this court to hear their case. The court will decide to accept such cases or not.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Court Support Staff: Clerks of court, court reporters, pretrial services personnel, bailiffs, court administrators, victim/witness assistance program personnel, rape crisis center…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ky Court System Structure

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The next level is the Circuit Court having 95 judges and commissioners. They handle real property of $4,001 and up, interstate support, exclusive civil appeals, domestic relations exclusive felony's, Juvenile and criminal appeals. Along side of the Civil Court is the Family court handling domestic violence and relations and Juvenile cases.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial branch of government interprets laws and administers justice. The judicial branch of government was established by Article lll of the Constitution along with other Federal courts created by Congress. This branch came about when statesmen who met in Philadelphia were followers of Montesquieu's concept that powers in politics should be balanced. John Locke's writings supported and made this principle stronger, this led to the judgment that there needed to be three equal branches of government, the executive, legislative, and the judicial branch.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Methods of judicial selection vary substantially across the United States. Though each state has a unique set of guidelines governing how they fill their state and local judiciaries, there are five main methods. The five main methods are partisan elections, nonpartisan elections, legislative elections, Gubernational appointment, and assisted appointment.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice 101

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages

    District courts are created by the Constitution. They are the trial courts of Kansas with jurisdiction over all civil and criminal cases, including divorce and domestic relations, damage suits, probate and administration of estates, guardianships, conservatorships, care of the mentally ill, juvenile matters, and small claims. It is here that the criminal and civil jury trials are held. Appeals may be taken from the district courts to the Court of Appeals and in some cases to the Supreme Court.…

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judicial branch is responsible for overseeing the local, state, and federal court systems. It explains the meaning of the Constitution and laws passed by the legislative branch and enforced by the executive branch. Now the Supreme Court is ahead of the judicial branch because it is the highest court of the land. The Supreme Court rules if whether or not the issue itself is constitutional. (Dictionary, 2013)…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court System Paper

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Each county court judge will serve a six-year term in office and will adhered to all punitive ethics not only of the county they are responsible for but also the Judicial Qualification Commission, along with other court officers.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    the judge at trial must be allowed to have the power to engage in the decision making process of…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of the state Trial Court is to listen and hear any criminal or civil case that is not in any other jurisdiction of another court. It is of limited jurisdiction as it can only handle some cases based on the amount in controversy, subject matter, administrative matters or statutory grant. The state also aims at finding the facts and determination of the case is made, in this case, though the decision can be appealed to a higher court for review. State Trial Court is the first court to handle a case, and the decision they make affects the people involved in the case alone.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Qualifications of becoming a state judge requires integrity, morality and honesty above all. To become a state judge, they must be appointed or elected into the position. A state elected, or appointed judge presides over court proceedings that he or she must rule over, making a ruling so that both party’s interest is met and the decision is a fair decision. Other responsibility is whether evidence is admissible or inadmissible, instruct the jury of their responsibility and how to proceed, advise offenders of their legal rights and review the evidence. A magistrate also upholds the question of law and makes difficult decision over litigation proceedings, DWI (Driving While Intoxicated),…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Any attempt at reform of the court system must essentially take on the dilemma of the delay and backlog of cases with an analysis of the causes and consequence of such delays in the court system. Reform measures also need to address court system reorganization, modernization and the strengthening of its administration, to allow for better case flow management; alternative…

    • 3539 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Circuit Court Judges sit in random panels of three judges for each case, unlike District Court Judges, who sit alone for their cases.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Branch

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our American judiciary branch of the federal government has contributed and molded our American beliefs in this great nation. This branch of government is respected because of the code of conduct that the judges, no matter how conservative or liberal. The language of the court as well as the uniform of the cloaks that judges wear has most probably contributed towards this widespread respect. Throughout the history of the United States, I noticed a pattern of “cause and effect” that our judiciary branch had practiced. I noticed that the judicial branch usually restrain themselves from involving in critical civil policy, but will be active when the time comes when the general public, in which the case is decided, feels a change is needed. We have enough evidence to see how our judicial branch should act. Should the judicial branch be more active towards shaping American policy or restrain as long as possible before being forced to act upon very critical civil policies? Judicial activism is the view that the Supreme Court should be an active and creative partner with the legislative and executive branches in shaping government policy (Wasserman American Politics 138). The believers of this philosophical view of how our judicial branch should be suggest that the Supreme Court more active and participate in molding the policies of American society. It can be argued that during the end of the Civil War and the “Separate but Equal” era, in cases such as the Brown v. Board of Education, Baker v. Carr, Missouri ex. Rel. Gaines v. Canada, and Sweatt v. Painter. The more recent, Bush v. Gore case is a fine example of judicial activism. Judicial Restraint, on the other hand, is the idea that the Court should not impose its views on other branches of the government or the states unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution (Wasserman American Politics 138). Judges, who believes in this form of our court system, say that a passive role of the court is preferred and that…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays