Preview

Immigration Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
980 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Immigration Dbq
The Greek philosopher Aristotle once said that the law is free from passion. The United States does not enforce laws based on the feelings of others; we enforce them for the better of the people and society. Passion should not dictate our rule; reason and precedent should be the most absolute principles included when determining the laws to safeguard the country. The sovereignty of the United States would diminish if laws were not based on virtuous causes. If the prosperity of the United States could be harmed, why should the citizens of the country not do everything possible to prevent this?
Commonly referred to as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 was enacted with the objective of excluding particular
…show more content…
The document does include the authority for the president to prevent immigrants from specific regions and countries from entering the United States. Under SEC. 212, paragraph 8, subsection (e), the Act reads, “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be …show more content…
The case law to date does not clearly provide any legal limits on the President’s use of authority when placing prohibitions on the entrances of immigrants into America. The Act provides very broad authority as to how the president of the United States may do so. When read carefully, the Act clearly does not authorize the president to prevent immigration based on country of origin, nevertheless, it does authorize the president's decision of preventing the immigration of aliens based on his stance. For example, the president shall have the power to place temporary restrictions on immigration based on country of origin if he deems that the well-being of the United States could be adversely affected by any immigrant or any foreign country. However, he is not recommended, nor is he permitted, to prohibit any alien or class of aliens from immigrating to the United States based on factors that include bias’ along with sex, income, and religious

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “is a nation of immigrants, but also a nation of laws, and these concepts are not mutually exclusive.” To suggest that the U.S. currently lacks laws regarding immigration and that President Trump’s failed immigration order would fill this void is highly irrational and ignores concrete immigration policy. Stewart further suggests that “we should never underestimate the unimaginable devastation that can result from a small number of [immigrants] driven by hatred.” “National security and public safety,” he writes, are “the preeminent functions of government.”…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late 19th century and early 20th century, immigration to the United States was wrought with challenges. The newly arriving aliens were met with racist native-borns who feared that they would threaten their way of life. This tension between these new groups facilitated the U.S. government’s anti-immigration laws, which also caused political outbursts from those who supported immigrants.…

    • 519 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH DBQ IMMIGRATION

    • 532 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Prompt: For the years 1880 to 1925, analyze both the tensions surrounding the issue of immigration and the United States government’s response to these tensions.…

    • 532 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The TRO restricts the enforcement of President Trump's executive order widely known as the "Travel Ban" or "Muslim Ban". The executive order bans individuals from seven countries entry to the U.S.A. for 90 days, suspends the refugee program for 120 days and suspends Syrian refugees indefinitely. The order also states that exceptions may be made in some cases "when in the national interest". However, it does not provide any explanation as to what qualifies as being in the national interest, or who evaluates the cases. The order goes on to direct that when the refugee program resumes operation, refugees of certain religions would have prioritized applications. The government insisted that the bans were a matter of protecting the nation from terrorism. The bans were put into place immediately, causing a widespread and very controversial effect.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second, President Trump excuses much of the legality of his executive order by saying that it’s a national security; though it is a fear tactic that he has used throughout his presidency, a few Google searches will confirm that there is not a national security risk. After the attacks on September 11, there were many freedoms restricted for a period while the nation worked on increasing national security and diminishing risks. The terrorist attacks instilled fear towards the entire Muslim community and much of the middle east (Kennedy); however, the nations listed on Trump’s immigration ban are not even the same nations that the terrorists behind the September 11 attacks. After the executive order was signed, a news agency from Iran wrote that…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 27, 2017. The order bans citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US for at least 90 days. The order also suspended refugee admission program of the US for 120 days. US officials added that the order is only a first step toward a wider ban, which is aimed at protecting the US from terrorist attacks. The executive order is in line with President Trump’s campaign pledge. He promised a total and complete shutdown of Muslim immigration during his presidential campaign.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vetting System

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people opposed Trump’s travel ban stating that none of the countries on the list proposed a threat to our national security. In many ways they are right. Trump claims that the countries on the list were responsible for 9/11. The original order also stated that green card holders and people with valid visas to work in the United States could not travel between our country and theirs until a more effective and efficient vetting system was put in place. In many ways, Trump is right. Our vetting system does take an extraordinarily long time and many immigrants find themselves waiting decades before their citizenship is granted. A more efficient system would prompt a quicker and easier entry to our country. However, constitutionally, you are not allowed to discriminate against any human regardless of religion, race or ethnicity. We can corroborate with the court cases like Korematsu’s that the detention or removal of a group of people from an entire country should never be allowed and that regardless of the war we are fighting. Citizens from those countries, unless under federal watch, should not have their rights infringed upon them due to scapegoating. Many great people from around the world come to work in the United States due to it’s endless opportunity and also many times because of the rights granted to each individual. A personal example is with my father. As a director at Google, he spends his time with people of every race, religion, sex for the majority of his day. Trump’s travel ban would prevent many people like the men and women my father works with from continuing to support their families, and would also prevent them from trying to build a life for themselves. In times of war, in many ways the President should take executive action to ensure the safety of our…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However that does not mean immigrants should not be allowed in our country. Many people have no choice but to come to our country. We should reform the immigration system to make it easier for people to migrate to America. They shouldn't be forced to hide in their country fearing death and then be kicked at of ours because they weren't invited. While it's true that some immigrants can be the cause of many problems that doesn't mean all of them should not have the right to a new life. This being said that also doesn't mean people should come to our country without our permission. We should have a reformed American citizen registration process. If it was already not known the process of becoming an American citizen from abroad is very complicated. You have to meet all of the specific requirements and create a passport specifically made the U.S. If our new president can reform and improve our immigration laws and…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 were signed into law by former President Ronald Raegan. This authorized and regulated that business meet requirements…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presidential candidates debate their plans, however, only Congress can rewrite the nations immigration laws. The president can use executive power to veto bills and set policy on how strict the law is enforced. The president has significant power with the help of congress to shape immigration policy.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a truth that nobody can deny: The United States of America is built by immigrants, and without immigrants, our nation would cease to exist. Our people come from all different continents: Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, and America. We come together to build this fabulous country as the land of hope, liberty and equality. All of those values are stated in our Declaration of Independence, “All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”. In contrast, our government use racial profiling on us.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Donald Trump was campaigning for his presidency, one of the platforms that he ran on was immigration reform. His immigration reform included extreme vetting of refugees and immigrants to protect the United States from terrorist attacks. On January 27, 2017 President Trump signed an Executive order that instantly imposed a 3-month ban on immigrants from seven major Muslim countries. The countries were Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. The order also suspended the U.S. refugee assistance program for 4 months and placed an indefinite ban on refugees from Syria. The Executive order also included anyone with a visa, green card or work permit from the seven countries listed. This action was taken to give the new government…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Us Immigration Myth

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages

    61 million, that is the number of immigrants currently residing in the United States (Ziegler). For the past year, there has been a great deal of negativity surrounding incoming immigrants, recent immigrants, and immigration in general. These attitudes were made more prevalent when the newly elected president, Donald Trump, instituted an executive order to temporarily ban entrance to the United States to seven Muslim-majority countries (Trump). This ban was eventually lifted by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Liptak). Although in the United States there continues to be negative stigmas around immigration and allowing immigrants into the U.S., immigrants greatly benefit and contribute to the United States by improving the economy, creating…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The history of immigration restriction began in 1849 when the Supreme Court ruled that immigration was “foreign commerce” and could be regulated by Congress {Daniels, 12}. The first major ruling on the restriction of public education to illegal immigrants didn’t come until well over a century later. The Pleyer v. Doe case, which went before the Supreme Court in 1982, began from a revision to a 1975 Texas education law that let the state withhold funds from local school districts for educating children who were illegal residents in the United States. The main question was whether this law violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.1 There was also the question of whether education was a universal right, which couldn’t be denied. The Supreme Court eventually ruled that states couldn’t deny the right to public education on…

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Illegal Aliens

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It cannot be dismissed that while the United States Constitution addresses immigration and the citizenship process, it does not directly address the processing of illegal aliens in Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: “The Congress shall have Power [to]...establish [a] uniform Rule of Naturalization…” (US Constitution). This gray area may allow, to a degree, an openness for…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays