Preview

How Did Western Civilization Affect The Republic Of Rome?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1440 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Western Civilization Affect The Republic Of Rome?
Although the Roman Republic came crashing down after the assassination of Caesar Augustus, in 27 B.C. his nephew, Octavian, recreated the society as an empire in order to prevent violence. As Octavian transformed the republic into a flourishing empire, he preserved the traditions of the republic. While doing so, he established a political system pertaining to a monarchy that would allow him to concentrate the power in his hands alone. This new system of governing would deliver Rome to its peak, allowing the Roman Empire to shape Western civilization through a process historians call “Romanization.”
Fourteen years of bloody civil war followed the assassination of Caesar Augustus, who was often referred to as the greatest emperor of Rome. Several men of power attempted to take the throne, but none other than Caesar’s own nephew, Octavian, were triumphant. A few years after taking the throne,
…show more content…
While this had little effect on the local people of the Roman countryside, new cities were immensely affected by the exposure to the unfamiliar Roman customs. The provinces, which started as settlements of army veterans and quickly became flourishing cities, adopted the Latin language and Roman law. As Roman culture improved life in the provinces, the provinces improved the standard of living for all of the Empire. Transportation and trade improved as agriculture flourished. Roads, bridges, and long aqueducts, which supplied the cities with fresh water, were built. Commercial interaction became more direct and taxes on international trade became a main source of revenue for the Roman government. The stationing of troops throughout the provinces increased business for farmers and merchants, due to the soldiers’ need of supplies. Historians believe it was easier for these provinces to accept Romanization because of their enhanced living conditions under Roman

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discuss the political and economic changes and continuities that occurred as Rome went from a Republic to an Empire…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The beginning for the direction of government and administration started with Julius Caesar wanting a centralized, imperial form of government. His plans did not span out with upset elite classes that led to his assassination. The elite men wanted to create a government that was not in their power, which led to conflict and chaos. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, ended the struggle and was the leader to start the imperial rule that was right for Rome. The government was disguised as a republic. Just as Caesar, Augustus ruled by centralizing political and military power. He preserved traditional republican offices and forms of government. Members of the Roman elite were also members of the government. Augustus accumulated vast power and took full responsibility for the important governmental functions. As a form of a bureaucracy, he was very careful to place individuals loyal to him…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Romans began a republic which had a 2 consuls, a senate, assemblies, and officials. The consuls were similar to modern day presidents but stayed in office for only a year. The Senate led religious events and foreign policy. It also was in control of the revenue. Roman senate consisted of the wealthy men. The assemblies were created so the people other than the wealthy could have their say in the government. However the people in the assemblies had to be full citizen males, meaning no foreigners or slaves. Roman republic officials did have decent authority but there laws were made to ensure they did not get too much power, leaving more of it to the wealthy. Rome was also centralized, because of its location and saw many migrations and invasions, from Po River people and those in Sicily. At 44 B.C. Rome became an empire, led by an emperor, with senators, advisers, and of course the massive army. Over time, the Roman army became more and more powerful. When Romans would conquer and expand they would normally devastate that area. Eventually, Rome became a military monarchy. Rome then split its empire in two, having a emperor in the west, and another in the east.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Octavian was Julius Caesar’s adopted son. When Caesar was killed by his own friends and consultants, Octavian personally led the manhunt to kill the people who took part in the attack. Octavian returned to Rome as the unquestioned supreme leader of his father’s empire. Upon his return, he assembled a large amount of money and the most powerful people in his empire, using this wealth and power to his advantage. He then became the supreme monarch of all of Rome. He used his increased power for the benefit of Rome and proceeded to strengthen and empower his empire just like his father before him. After Octavian’s death there were many emperors who abused their powers and showed it was difficult to be as skilled of a leader as Octavian.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the first three hundred years of the Roman Empire the issue of succeeding as Emperor was decided either dynastically or by Adoptive succession. In Dynastic succession the current Emperor selects one of his relatives to succeed him. In some cases like with Augustus choosing Tiberius, the choice is only made because the intended successors are no longer a viable option, in this case due to the deaths of his intended heirs. Throughout the rest of the Julio-Claudian line and also with Commodus it seems that the preferred way of handling succession was Dynastic. The Roman populace seemed to prefer dynastic succession, and I think the current Emperor would have been more comfortable in leaving his Empire to someone that they were familiar…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This loss of power brought about a series of civil wars fought among generals with the backing of their distinct armies. Julius Caesar eventually prevailed when in 49 BCE he rode into Italy with his army against the orders of the Senate. In 44 BCE he declared himself dictator for life, but was murdered by a crew of strict republicans on the Ides of March 44 BCE. This once again plunged Rome into civil war and while Caesar's heir, his grand-nephew Octavian, and Marc Antony initially joined sides to avenge his death, they soon turned against each other and Octavian eventually triumphed over Antony and his ally, Cleopatra. Octavian was given the honorific title 'Augustus' in 27 BCE and ruled Rome for the next 40 years. While he claimed to have restored the Republic, Augustus held many important administrative and religious positions simultaneously and so, in fact, became the first emperor. He attempted to maintain control over the Empire by improving road systems and augmenting town growth. He also united the Empire through his use of the arts as a form of self-promotion and to promote the themes of his administration, such as peace, allegiance to Rome, and respect for tradition. He visually improved the city by constructing new buildings that were worthy of the powerful Empire. He made art into the materialization of Roman government which was an idea continued by his descendants and was declared a god-- as had been his father, Julius Caesar-- at his death in 14…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 500 BCE and 500 CE, the Roman civilization experienced changes both politically and culturally. Firstly, Rome’s government transitioned from a Republic to an Empire. Later, that empire was split into two parts; east and west. In terms of changes in culture, it was impacted by the shift in religion, as the Romans shifted from polytheism to monotheism. Despite all the changes, Rome still remained culturally diverse.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did Rome Become Good?

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In ancient Greece there was a situation where there were multiple city-states in a relatively small area that all had different political ideologies. These City States had highly regarded philosophers that wrote great lengths about them. This gives us a great foundation to try to understand the different systems and how they were based. The goal is to analyze some of the different ideologies and find why they were thought to be so good, and what made them good.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    revision notes

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    -as romans took over more places and people they adjusted their institutions to the task of ruling an imperial capital city and distant places. Rather than having kings they installed 2 consuls or chief magistrates who would hold office for 1 year. This radical move from kingship to republic was accompanied by measures designed to prevent a return to one-man rule. Personal authority in the republic was constrained by a strict term limit on magistracies.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Augustus, the first emperor of the Roman Empire, brought order to the vast lands Rome had conquered and brought an end to over one hundred years of civil war. He disbanded the large armies that had been recruited during the civil war and consolidated his power. The people welcomed the new dictator, and enjoyed peace and prosperity. With peace came increased trade and commerce, and ideas traveled freely along the Roman Empire's well designed roads. However, the emperors after Augustus were not as politically gifted as Augustus. Four emperors and fifty-four years later, the Roman Empire was once again thrown into a violent civil war.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Roman government changed from a republic to an empire, this doesn’t seem an easy task for modern day governments. How was it that this occurred? And what impact did Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar have on this change? Julius Caesar, although not completely starting the process, this was begun be Sulla, Caesar did draw the power away from the senate and bestowed it upon himself, partaking in constant wars, instead of stabilising the republic. When he died, Rome fell back into civil war and power was regained by Julius Caesar’s heir, Augustus. Augustus continued drawing Rome away from a republic, as was his only option if Rome was to survive. He was almost completely unchallenged once he took power as his opponents were dead from the war. He began rebuilding the nation and restored it to its prior capacity and further. Caesar was the overall catalyst for the reform and Augustus simply continued with that legacy.…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Empire was one of the largest and most powerful empires in the world. The nation was a colossus; at its height, the empire controlled most of Europe, North Africa, and Asia Minor. However, the empire’s vast territory proved to be difficult to maintain; groups from all over the world began to move into the empire and invade the nation. More problems in addition to heightening conflicts began to proliferate as the empire crumbled. The deterioration and collapse of the Roman Empire was the result of the failure of its political system, depreciation of traditional Roman values, and growth of slavery as well as the advance of Christianity, destruction of the plague, and lead poisoning.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics