Preview

Analyze Similarities And Differences In Techniques Of Imperial Administration

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
961 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyze Similarities And Differences In Techniques Of Imperial Administration
The Classical empires of Rome and Han had similar and different means of imperial administration. Both empires focused on centralized administration and military expansion. They also concentrated on maintaining a full bureaucracy to help the empire prosper. The beginning for the direction of government and administration started with Julius Caesar wanting a centralized, imperial form of government. His plans did not span out with upset elite classes that led to his assassination. The elite men wanted to create a government that was not in their power, which led to conflict and chaos. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, ended the struggle and was the leader to start the imperial rule that was right for Rome. The government was disguised as a republic. Just as Caesar, Augustus ruled by centralizing political and military power. He preserved traditional republican offices and forms of government. Members of the Roman elite were also members of the government. Augustus accumulated vast power and took full responsibility for the important governmental functions. As a form of a bureaucracy, he was very careful to place individuals loyal to him …show more content…
All of the dominated lands were integrated into a larger economy and society. Roman expansion had dramatic effects in the European lands that were embraced by the empire. When the Roman soldiers, diplomats, governors, and merchants began to arrive, they stimulated the development of local economies and states. Resources were accessed such as tin, and they encouraged people to cultivate wheat, olives, and grapes to help the Roman economy flourish. The Roman representatives allied with various local ruling elites and used the wealth that came into their communities to control natural resources and build much larger states then ever before. Cities emerged where administrators and merchant conducted their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although both Han China and Imperial Rome had large, long lasting empires with similar economies and some similar policies centralized governments and similar administrative policies regarding land reform, their techniques of imperial administration differed in terms of how it came to be and how emperors ruled.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Government consisted of Consuls and a Senate. Instead of having a king, the Romans chose consuls, two of them. The community elected neither of them but instead appointed by the popular assembly the Comitia Centuriata. Each consul serves one year, it's nonconsecutive, term, he could help a second or a third later. Consuls possessed supreme executive power, commanding the army, presiding over the Senate, the proposing legislation, but they could veto the others decision.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From 206 B.C.E. - 220 C.E., the Han dynasty, in China, accumulated many political control methods, as did Imperial Rome reigning from 31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E. However, there were more differences than similarities between the two empires/dynasties. Two main differences were China and Rome’s territorial expansion and their political philosophies (mandate of heaven and monarchy). A similarity between these two empires would be their centralized government adopting bureaucracy.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The roman and Han Empire were different in their political and governmental control through the use of the monarchy and the republic system. The monarchy of the Han Empire was a method of political control because it really strengthened the power of the government to really crackdown on the citizens to make sure that there were no protests or any riots. This control also showed the kinds of beliefs that they had in Han China. Also another type of political control that they used was the filial piety. Filial piety is the respect for your father and elders. This kept the people in check because they had to respect all their elders and the people that were above them. In the Roman Empire the republic method was more based on keeping the society happy then using political authority power. They would hold bread circuses and different events such as the gladiatorial games to keep them happy and prevent riots. The effectiveness of the system in Rome is demonstrated by the explosion of art, giving credit to people that…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though Imperial Rome and Han had very similar political structures their militaries were very different. Rome's military was used to reinforce laws, and was very strong and powerful, unlike Han china. In Han China, their military is mainly used for less important issues. The emperor in Imperial Rome headed the military, and in Han China, the emperor was not the only one heading the military.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome had a political system structure consisting of a sovereign emperor who made executive, almost dictator-like, decisions and directed the affairs of the empire. However, in both empires, emperors relied on regional governors to regulated affairs in their respective regions due to the fact that both empires were so massive and consisted of an enormous population.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason that the Roman Empire and the Han were so powerful is because both had strong central governments. While they were able to do this, each had varying methods of…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Vs Han

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a lot in common, but they also have many differences. For instance, the Roman Empire relied heavily on slave (mostly prisoners of war) labor, but the Han Dynasty relied greatly on free peasant labor. Although both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a well organized bureaucracy, the Han Dynasty had bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideology. Also the Han Dynasty did not have paved roads, where as the Roman Empire constructed many paved roads (which was because the romans discovered concrete).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China and Imperial Rome’s method of political control differs through styles of leadership. Within Han China, rule was gained through ancestors into a centralized bureaucratic authority and later authority became aristocratic unlike within Imperial Rome where authority began through aristocratic landlords and certain elements of democracy, not through ancestral means, and later transformed into totalitarianism. Bureaucracy is a system of government in which state officials make most of the important…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The factors that contributed to the demise of the Roman empire and the Han empire have elements that are the same. The Roman government became less effective due to struggles over who was going to be in power. Twenty-six barrack emperors came and fell from power in a short period of time. Each of these emperors was violently displaced by the general who wanted to be the emperor of Rome next. This is no way to keep government control stable. The constant power struggle led to the government officials being more focused on how to become the next emperor then how to run the…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism or Colonialism is the policy of setting up empires and colonies. European countries used three basic ideas from Imperialism to being to build their own empires. The three basic ideas were, Nationalism, the Industrial Revolution and Civilization. Nationalism is devotion and loyalty to one’s country. The industrial revolution was the new manufacturing process, and creation of new products. Civilization is the belief that white men were superior to all other beings. With the use of colonialism, the Industrial Revolution and nationalism, the European countries were able to have almost total control of their conquered and home countries.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays