Preview

How Did Lenin Support The Russian Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
799 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Lenin Support The Russian Revolution
socialists and Lenin but failed. Unconsciously, Kornilov brought back the Bolshevicks on the scene of the Russian Revolution. The picture of Kornilov, shows him in front of his army ready to attack Petrograde as the photograph was taken in summer 1917. He looks determined but his army looks small and quite weak compared to the Bolshevik's troops and the Kerensky's troops. The fact that the Bolsheviks helped Kerensky only restored the Bolsheviks as patriots in the eyes of the Russians and enabled them to continue their plan to seize power.

This plan to seize power was mainly based of Lenin's and Lenin's collaborators ideas. The role of Lenin in the overthrow of the provisional government is huge. He was the Bolshevik's leader and controlled the soviets …show more content…
Lenin was not allowed to stay in Russia by Kerenski but When Lenin returned to Russia on 3rd April, 1917, he announced what became known as the April Theses. Source E, which is an extract from these theses, suggests that in these theses, Lenin attacked Bolsheviks for supporting the Provisional Government. He tells the Bolshevik's that they should not cooperate with the Provisional government because it should "cease to be an imperialist Government". He says that the power should be transferred to the Soviets and only them. Source E was written by Lenin himself and shows the mentality of Lenin who was completely against the provisional government. In addition, Lenin urged the peasants to take the land from the rich landlords and the industrial workers to seize the factories. Lenin accused those Bolsheviks who were still supporting the Provisional Government of betraying socialism and suggested that they
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Who Was The Most Successful Russian Rulers From 1856-1964
    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Who Was The Most Successful Russian Rulers From 1856-1964

    The reforms and policies made during the last Tsarist years were not in the interests of the people but were made simply to maintain the power of the Tsar and his nobles. Most people would argue that during the years 1917-1964 there was more political freedom and less repression than in the Tsarist years. The provisional government did not meet the needs of the Russian people. They were an unstable and temporary government, and many people on the furthest parts of the Russian empire did not know about their existence. This provided them with many issues, such as trying to enforce democracy onto people they did not understand what democracy actually was. Many historians believe that at this point the people of Russia did not know themselves what form of government they wanted and due to the lack of education they did not know what form was best for them. In October 1917 came the Bolshevik revolutions. With their leader, Lenin, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and came into power. The leadership of Lenin was met with great approval from the people. Lenin promised political freedom unknown to them under the Tsars and Provisional government. In his rule…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did Nikolai Romanov Fail?
    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Did Nikolai Romanov Fail?

    The first of these was headed by a moderate liberal, Georgi Lvov and the second was ran by Alexander Krensky. The Provisional Government knew that the Bolsheviks were going to strike. The reports of the Bolshevik's conspiracy in where always in Krensky's mind, but there was overwhelming dissent about the revolution. The government was so unstable that Krensky had little to no control over the congress or military, and because Krensky did not have "the majesty of government, the laws, the protection of friends and of the state," he had no power, no control over his fortune. Krensky's failure as a prince had to do with the unstable government and the political factions all brewing their revolutions and civil unrest. He did not prepare for fortune. He met his end by not being able to deal with…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain why there was no clear succession to Lenin in 1924.
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain why there was no clear succession to Lenin in 1924.

    In the USSR at the time of Lenin’s death there was no voting system for power. Although the Communists were the party destined to lead the USSR and there was no dangerous rival for their authority, the…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917
    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why was the Bolshevik take over in Octo
    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why was the Bolshevik take over in Octo

    Furthermore, the Bolsheviks had no figure of leadership in Russia – Lenin had been exiled to Switzerland. Consequently, until Lenin’s return in April, the Bolsheviks were left to decide what the best decisions to make for the party were; they began to support the Provisional Government, believing the Marxist’s plan of achieving a Socialist community was being fulfilled. However, when Lenin returned to Russia, April 3rd 1917, he degraded the Provisional Government and the idea of supporting them, insisting that all power goes towards the Soviet. Lenin’s sudden change in Bolshevik ideals unsettled the party and it took time to resolve the drastic change. This move made the Bolsheviks legitimacy questionable due to the abrupt change in Bolshevik ideals.…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Causes of Bolshevik Success Using Voilence
    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Causes of Bolshevik Success Using Voilence

    The enormous problems Lenin faced included the fact that Russia was still at war with Germany and Austria-Hungary and occupying forces controlled most of western Russia. At any minute they could march on the city which was virtually defenceless. The peasants had seized lands across the country, industrial production had slumped, unemployment was rising and so was inflation. Furthermore, although they were strong in cities such as Petrograd and Moscow, the Bolsheviks did not have mass support across the country. Lenin felt too vulnerable at the end of October 1917 to cancel the elections to the…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Joseph Stalin Research Paper Essay Example
    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Joseph Stalin Research Paper Essay Example

    With the Bolsheviks, Stalin helped with many revolutions. The first was the take down of Tsar Nicholas II and the Russian Tsarist government. With the tsarist takedown, Russia set up a new provisional government. It worked at first but then it started going downhill. Since fleeing the country in fear of arrest, Lenin put Stalin in charge of the central committee of the Bolsheviks Party. Unimpressed by Stalin’s compromising with the Provisional government, Lenin started writing hate letters to the provisional government. Most, if not all, of these letters were published in…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lenin Gain Power
    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Lenin Gain Power

    He outsmarted his rivals (Ex. Trotsky) in order to win the power clashes and take control of the Communist Party of the…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Axis Powers
    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Axis Powers

    Lenin (the leader of the Bolsheviks) was very concerned that the brutal thug who had been very useful to the party when they were an underground, illegal organization, would prove to be a thuggish influence if given government office.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in 1917?
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in 1917?

    In this essay I will analyse a combination of reasons on how the Bolsheviks came to power and discuss events such as the February and October revolutions, the fall of the Tsarist rule and the Provisional government.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Part 1 Stalin Myth Essay
    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Part 1 Stalin Myth Essay

    He argues that under Lenin was a “collectable leadership” with which they discussed political strategy. Stalin was power-hungry who repressed those who would stand up for their opinion, he didn't listen to the people and attacked those who supported him. Using the idea of “Enemy of the people” to justify his actions.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Lenin "an heir to Russian tradition"?
    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was Lenin "an heir to Russian tradition"?

    Since the tsar, Lenin has taken the ‘throne’ and along with the Bolsheviks proceeded to turn Russia into a one-party state. It can be argued that Russia has remained almost unchanged in terms of government policies and its traditions this is shown by Lenin's oppressive policies such as censorship. Lenin was not born into power and this shows he is in fact not an "heir" to Russian tradition. Similarly he had as little time for democracy as the tsars had, and as heir to the Russian tradition had followed the oppressive system and provided the continuation of the absolutist tradition in Russian. The Kronstadt revolt (1921) was a clear proof of the absolutism of the Bolshevik control and it is seen that rather than changing- Lenin ultimately replaced one form of state authoritarianism with another.…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Karl Marx: Historical Investigation
    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Karl Marx: Historical Investigation

    Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare And Contrast Russian Revolution And American Revolution
    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Russian Revolution And American Revolution

    Russia had lost a lot of territory to Germany and Austria. Generals and the higher class were not reliable in the military and were completely incompetent. There were food riots all over Russia and the troops refused to listen to their superiors. The March Revolution was one of the three revolutions that Russia had during this time period. The Tsar Nicholas the second removed himself from the throne. The Duma, or Parliament of Russia were ignored and held no power up until this point. They took over the government and called themselves the Provisional Government. The Provisional government was set up to make a Democratic constitution and have free elections. Alexander Kerensky was elected president. He believe that the only way to end the war was to have a victorious peaceful ending. The peasants which make up more then half of the population wanted the war to end whether it was victorious or not. They were sick of loosing their sons and stated that they refused to grow crops and make goods as long as the war was still going on. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks, which had about 100,000 members out of the 160 million people in Russia. He went head to head against Kerensky over power and leadership of Russia. In October Lenin got his group together and convinced them to take control of the government. He eventually took over and created the Bolshevik Dictatorship, using military force. The differences of…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    In March of 1917 in Russia, The Tsar, Nicholas II had little choice. The Great War (as it was known as at that time) had turned into a disaster, conditions at home were horrible, and the Menshevik government had forced Nicholas to abdicate He did this for himself and his son and gave the power to his brother. His brother gave up the power the next day because the country was in such disarray. After that, the Provisional Government took power. By November of 1917 in Russia, the Provisional Government was in complete collapse. In the meantime, the Bolshevik party, which was helped by German money, had built up an efficient party organisation, had a brilliant propaganda machine, and a powerful private army know as the Red Guards.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics