Preview

How Did King Louis Influence The French Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did King Louis Influence The French Revolution
The leadership of King Louis continued to fail miserably when he came to an impasse with the secret meeting of the Third Estate. Louis refused to align himself with the people even though he reminded himself of previous French king’s alliance, and instead, he gave a discreet answer to the people that proved unsatisfactory and vague. His refusal to choose an order highlighted his distance from the reality of the revolution and his non-committal answer revealed to the public his deficiency of leadership. The character of Louis became more noticeable to the public eye as his speeches and answers lacked substance and passion for France. From 1787 until his decision at the Etats-Généraux, King Louis sided with the unprivileged and after the Tennis Court Oath for the new constitution, he decided to bring in the privileged classes to make compromises with the Third Estate. King Louis betrayed the Third Estate and showed them his own indecisiveness—he …show more content…
In her letters, she adopted the opinions of Barnave—one of her political influences for the Constitutional Monarchy—for the sole purpose of swaying her husband to agree. Her letters spoke for the both of them, but she only used the pronoun ‘I’. She writes “we had both thought (the King and I) that a proclamation could not be helpful to enlighten all French people on the King’s real intentions. The one I send you a copy of herewith seems to me very good.” Louis’s true political opinion hid underneath the authority and weight of his wife. The power of his wife strengthened the limitations of the monarch during the revolution and further ruined his reputation as strong. Even though Marie’s political ideas differed strongly from his own, Louis’s weak and docile personality caused him to fail miserably at maintaining his own thoughts and crawling to his wife for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Franco-Dutch War Analysis

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Louis XIV considered himself to be appointed by God as an absolute ruler of France, the “Roi-Soleil” (5). He lived lavishly at Versailles, and pacified the nobility and foreign diplomats by including them in his indulgent lifestyle (5). Louis aspired to make France the most powerful state in Europe; he was, as Voltaire stated, “passionné pour la gloire” of France. Likely from a point of patriotic pride, he especially wished to recover former land holdings that had belonged to France under Charlemagne. He likewise aimed to control territory along the Rhine for the purpose of strategic defense of French borders (3). Louis’ wife, Maria Theresa, was a Spanish monarch who had surrendered her right to inherit Spanish territory on the condition that a dowry be paid to Louis. Spain never paid the dowry, and Louis believed that she was, therefore, entitled to territory in the Spanish Netherlands.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, there were multiple accounts of nobles in previous reigns rebelling and causing general trouble for the provinces and the King. For instance, the Fronde, or French civil war, in which powerful nobles and aristocrats rebelled against Louis’s mother ,Queen Anne of Austria, who instilled policies that strengthened the monarchy’s power. To add clarity, the Queen’s policies angered the nobles and aristocrats because it made the Queen more powerful than them to which they were against as they detested the monarchy or the Queen being more powerful than them. This newfound power could then lead to the Queen taking away their power, so they rebelled and caused the Fronde. Hence, why young Louis resolved to ensure their obedience and suppress their power, to ensure that another civil uprising wouldn’t occur in the future. However, how he accomplished this is a whole other matter. One could even say his methods were…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An Absolute Monarchy was a new concept to the people of France during the 1600’s. Other forms of government were failing from lack of control, so the people of France turned to an Absolute Monarch, named Louis XIV. The only problem with Louis was that he was self-centered, and did not care a whole lot about governing his kingdom. He was more concerned with making himself looking good, and even went as far to call himself the “Sun God.” As a result, the French common people lived very rough lives, due to the neglect of their king. It was not an easy life for the French people under King Louis XIV’s rule, and it was not made better by his view on governing. This is shown through his lack of genuine care for his people, over taxation, and wars of the time.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After he took power, Louis XIV made the nobility tax exempt, so the heavy burden of the taxes lied on the peasants, which made their already hard lives even tougher. In document 3, it explains how Louis XIV keeps his courtier in line so that they stay diligent in pleasing him. The documents also depicts his oppressiveness, stating that Louis XIV had many spies that tattled on anyone of any class which ruined the person’s life since the king was a prejudice who did not bother to ask for explanations. Other cruel changes he made during his rule was revoking the Edict of Nantes, which tolerated the Huguenots in France and gave them religious rights. In place of the Edict of Fontainebleau, which allowed the destruction of all Protestant churches and schools throughout France. During the War of the Spanish Succession, Louis XIV prioritized his personal interests above his country’s because he wanted to insure his grandson's, Philip V, right to inherit the Spanish Empire. The war weakened France and situated the country in a huge financial debt, which was blamed on Louis XIV. This shows his views on how to be a proper role of an absolute monarch; apparently, you can do whatever you want since you hold the power and as long as you keep those who have the ability to rebel under control. It also implies that his views are that…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When The King Took Flight

    • 1255 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In June 1791, King Louis XVI and his family snuck out of Paris during the night, hoping to escape from the French Revolution and its violence. He planned to escape the country and return with foreign assistance to reclaim control of France, but the people of Varennes stopped and detained him until authorities arrived and sent him back to Paris. Louis’ attempted escape, in addition to the letter he left behind denouncing the Revolution, “profoundly influenced the political and social climate of France” (223). His escape outraged many people and left the administration in shambles, and this caused tensions to break out. To control the situation, the people of France quickly organized their own authoritative forces. Timothy Tackett argues in When the King Took Flight that Louis XVI’s escape is significant because it destroyed faith in the monarch and amplified the violence of the Revolution but at the same time instilled a new sense of unity among the French.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ruler is one of the most important parts of a country. They can cause gain or loss for the people, and sometimes even a mixture of both. An exemplary leader can bring great change to a nation, and there are many who have caused incredible reforms. For example, Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery in the United States, and King Louis XVIII of France inadvertently caused a revolution. Though Louis may be well known, the most famous of France’s rulers was arguably Napoleon. His military success and determination led to a huge amount of power within his French Empire, but ultimately a great fall. The entire nation of France was able to appreciate Napoleon and give him perhaps more credit than he is due; they saw him as a beacon of hope. Much of Napoleon’s rule consisted of extreme changes to France’s society and church, but other areas, such as education, individual rights, and government, were hardly affected.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe several factors, such as Feudalism, unfair taxes, years of oppression, inequality in the French society, the bad harvest of the summer of 1788 and the increasing economic crises contributed and lit the fuse of the French revolution. The calling of the Estates-General in May 1789 was aimed to solve the economic crises, however mistreatment of the lower classes for centuries led to them wanting change. This event led to the Tennis Court Oath, in which the lower classes, who were represented by the third Estate declared themselves a National Constituent Assembly. This could be seen as the start of the French revolution, as it is the first time that Louis is not in full control and gives away part of his power to the population. Furthermore the increasing economic hardship led to anti-government feelings among the population and a rise in popularity towards the popular movement.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis bribed the provincial governors to elect him. He did this to ensure loyalty to the kings at all levels of government. He also had a three year term so that any governors, who were not loyal, would not remain in power. Louis centralized the government, and had absolute control over them. During the constitution in England, Charles I was the king in 1625 with limited powers. He followed his father’s footsteps; James I, and was a stubborn man where the Parliament disliked him. Charles suspended the Parliament when the Parliament did not grant him to raise the taxes. But Charles had to recall the Parliament for its support to finance the war in Ireland. This led to many problems. When the parliamentarians captured Charles I, they tried to negotiate with him, but he refused to compromise. The parliamentarians had no choice but to behead him. Therefore, Absolutism in France was much more secure than Constitutionalism in…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Revolutionaries had it clear in their minds that change in government was of utmost importance to revolution. According to an excerpt from Diderot’s Encyclopedia, or Classified Dictionary of the Sciences, Arts, and Occupations,” The first state that man acquires by nature and that is esteemed the most precious of all his possible possessions is his state of liberty.” (Doc. 6) Clearly France’s Monarchy, or even upper classmen, would not agree with this statement. This argument could have been used by the third estate to fight for their representation in government, or even their percentage of property owned in the country. The event in which the third estate was literally locked out of the Estates General meeting that led to the Tennis Court Oath also was a huge cause for the…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ French Revolution

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Louis XVI ignored the demands of the Third Estate. When the Third Estate wanted to form the National Assembly, this exposed Kind Louis XIV's abuse of power. The Estates General was unfair due to the Third Estates constantly being outvoting by the first and second estates. This resulted in the Tennis Court Oath which said they wouldn't give up. Instead, the people of the Third Estate turned to rioting like when they stormed the Bastille to free political prisoners.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oka Conflict Analysis

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When the people or the nation disagree, or when their nationalist loyalties lead them to pursue contending goals, an attitude of reconciliation can bring them together and enable them to coexist in peace. But when two contending loyalties cannot achieve reconciliation, the outcome can be serious. The inability to resolve the differences may lead to damaging political struggles and even outright war. The French Revolution is an example of the conflicts that can occur due to the divisions of social classes. The French society was divided into three estates of the Ancien Regime: the First Estate (the Roman Catholic clergy), the Second Estate (the nobility), and the Third Estate (serfs and the rest of population). By the 18th century, the bourgeoisie, the middle class who earned wealth through trade, demanded a change to the ancien regime due to the increase of education and literacy. The bourgeoisie were unsatisfied with the economic, legal, and political limitations imposed on them and wanted a change to the outdated political structure, they wanted a voice that is more closely reflected on their numbers. When the government were unable to agree on a solution, many people were beginning to question the absolute power of the monarchy. The king, Louis XVI, called the representatives of the three estates to discuss political change, but little was settled during these meetings, due to the…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The estates general meeting was a huge opportunity for the poorest people of the third estate to be heard by the king. The double representation was seen as a huge victory and a hope for a change was growing. On the first days of the meeting, they brought cahiers, the King and his delegates announced the principles of the meeting and the Third Estate discovered that the double representation was in fact a sham. It was decided that the votes will be hold by orders, 1 vote for each estate and not by head. The double representation was a fallacy. Louis XVI and his advisors focused on a complete overhaul of the French tax system. They exposed their view while the only preoccupation of the Third Estate was to talk about their representation. The only solution to the financial crisis was to make all us people of France pay the taxes because of the deficit spending, no matter what estate they were from. At the time, only us the third estate was subject to the taxes. The Nobility was taking care of the lands and the Clergy was responsible of the people's education. Their argument was that their action was a huge benefit to society and should therefore be exempt from paying taxes. But obviously, the King's decision was heavily rejected by the Nobility. Louis XVI faced a huge resistance from his own group who wouldn't accept any loss of wealth or power. He was heavily criticized by the Nobility who pictured him as a stupid, nerdy man with a way of governing the country that was full of nonsense.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nationalist perspective of King Louis XIV is that the head of the country is the nation and for society to prosper the people have to be willing to serve and follow the leader’s will. The source’s perspective can be shown throughout history by the beliefs and values he had during his reign in France. The source believed in the uses of a social hierarchy and the absolute monarch. The social hierarchy benefited the people who were part of the Roman Catholic Clergy or nobility. These people received privileges and were not required to pay taxes. The rest of the population had a difficult and challenging way of living. They were required to serve the king by paying taxes which lead to poor living conditions, in which some died from starvation. The absolute monarch allowed all the power in France to be consolidated in the hands of the king. This allowed for King Louis XIV to be the main voice in France and gave the power to decide how the country will operate. These ideals were the main contributions to start of the French Revolution, many people felt that they deserved better rights which lead the nation members to revolt and seek a better constitution. The source would disagree with J.D Vance’s idea to bridge the gap between the rich and poor. King Louis XIV would believe that he should not have to…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The disagreement continued, and members of the Third Estate formed the famous Tennis Court Oath. The Tennis Court Oath was an oath of the Third Estate declaring that they would not disband until a written constitution was established. The Third Estate continued to say that the king’s orders were still unfair, and he ordered troops to Versailles, and Paris. The Parisians were angry by both high prices for bread, and rumors that Louis’s troops intended to murder…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays