Preview

Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1168 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis
In 17th-18th century Europe, the age of absolutism, absolute monarchs ruled most of Europe in countries such as Prussia, France, and the Holy Roman Empire. Absolute monarchs are rulers that have complete control over the government and its people. They claimed to rule by “divine right,” where their authority comes from God and they were above the law. The views of being a proper role as an absolute monarch differed very much between rulers and their subjects. Certain rulers had ideas that both the people and ruler should be united, some abused their power with no sympathy towards the people they rule, and the subjects that suffered from the rulings of the monarch had a completely different perspective than the rulers that were in power.
Absolute
…show more content…
After he took power, Louis XIV made the nobility tax exempt, so the heavy burden of the taxes lied on the peasants, which made their already hard lives even tougher. In document 3, it explains how Louis XIV keeps his courtier in line so that they stay diligent in pleasing him. The documents also depicts his oppressiveness, stating that Louis XIV had many spies that tattled on anyone of any class which ruined the person’s life since the king was a prejudice who did not bother to ask for explanations. Other cruel changes he made during his rule was revoking the Edict of Nantes, which tolerated the Huguenots in France and gave them religious rights. In place of the Edict of Fontainebleau, which allowed the destruction of all Protestant churches and schools throughout France. During the War of the Spanish Succession, Louis XIV prioritized his personal interests above his country’s because he wanted to insure his grandson's, Philip V, right to inherit the Spanish Empire. The war weakened France and situated the country in a huge financial debt, which was blamed on Louis XIV. This shows his views on how to be a proper role of an absolute monarch; apparently, you can do whatever you want since you hold the power and as long as you keep those who have the ability to rebel under control. It also implies that his views are that …show more content…
As noted in documents 4, 5, and 6, peasants suffered immensely from the high taxes that the monarchs put on them. In document 4, the report of the Commission of Enquiry into the Conditions of the Peasants of Bohemia, it states that even good nobles couldn't protect their peasants from the high taxes and all financial burdens are put on the peasants who are the only ones that pay the taxes. In document 5, an excerpt that was written by Arthur Young, talks about the lives of peasants. This section is saying that the nobility that actually have the money to pay the taxes don't even have to pay, but the ones that can't afford the taxes are responsible for the whole country's financial state. In document 6, Adam Olearius states that the common people are living roughly like slaves but they still endure it without much complaint. The subjects are not being protected by the absolute monarch and they still go through life. There is a great difference in the way the absolute monarchs live and how his subjects live. This leads to the different perspectives on the view of being a proper role of an absolute monarch. While the king only sees the expansion of his kingdom, the peasant sees the hardship of the life in the kingdom. The subjects would view that being a proper monarch you should be kind and consider the aspects of the people you rule's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the death of his father, King Louis XIII, young Louis XIV inherited the throne of France at age 4 in 1643. However, he became king during a time in which France was unstable. For instance, during his early reign as king, young Louis was driven from his palace in Paris to another palace by the name of Saint Germain due to one of the many riots that took place during the French civil war known as the Fronde. This instance, proved to be one young Louis would never forget, as it sparked his desire to reinstate the King’s power and dignity. Additionally, furthering his desire to empower the king’s name, there was also the instance where his chief minister Cardinal Mazarin died in 1661, leading him to become an absolute monarch. In fact, after Mazarin’s death, he never appointed another chief minister, and had named himself the Sun King due to his belief in divine right. After…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Absolutism, “the political practice of unlimited power and absolute sovereignty, especially as held by a monarch,” was a prominent form of government in Europe until the eighteenth century. Monarchs believed that they alone held the “divine right to rule,” and there were no checks and balances on their authority. Leaders felt as though they were justified in ruling in any way that they wanted, even if it caused harm to their people. France and Spain both had absolutist monarchies for significant amounts of time, the Bourbon house in France and the Hapsburg dynasty in Spain. The most strongly absolutist rulers of those families were King Louis XIV in France and King Philip II in Spain.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolute Monarchs

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The three absolute monarchs that are being compared are Philip II of Spain, Queen Elizabeth I of England, and Louis XIV of France. There are many things that are similar and many that are different in their rules. It is valuable to find parallels in their rules and compare mistakes and successes made every one of these monarchs in the three most important areas of government. The three areas of rule that are being specifically looked at are their foreign policy, their religious policy, and the economic concerns and decisions of their respective rules. Each one of these areas are intertwined and effect each other largely so looking for similarities is imperative for learning.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Frq

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    King Louis XIV was a totalitarian and absolutist whose goal was “one king, one law, one faith.” He successfully accomplished his goals for “one king” and “one law” through divine right, and the establishment of Versailles, which centralized France and limited the power of the nobility. His last goal, however, “one faith” was hardly successful because it took a considerable amount of time to accomplish; but he eventually ended up with an entirely Catholic France.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late 1400s and 1500s, many rulers took great measures to centralize political power and place it in their own hands. This lead to the occurrence of absolute monarchies, some of which I thought were overall very effective. In absolute monarchies, theoretically the monarch is all-powerful, with no legal limitations to his or her authority. Absolutism in Europe was characteristically justified by the doctrine of divine right, according to which the monarch reigns all-powerfully by the will of God. The intention of absolute monarchs is to utilize his or her power in an effective, better-organized way, despite its weaknesses or negative consequences; and from my perspective, I would have to say that the three most effective rulers ever are King Louis XIV, Frederick the Great, and Peter the Great.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV's ideology for French power and centralization, “one king, one law, one faith,” was his main focus during his reign as France's ruler. He achieved “one king” by declaring himself as the absolute ruler of France, “one law” by limiting the power of other governmental figures and “one faith” by uniting the French religion. As an absolutist leader, with a centralized government, his many actions (including the removal of the Edict of Nantes) made France the supreme European power, but internal issues prevailed. Louis XIV's goal of "one king, one law, one faith" was successful politically, but detrimental to France economically (from his acquired debt) and socially (from his domestic reform).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is a simple manner was the absolute power held by the monarch, and was exempt from being challenged. In other words, a monarch could, in theory, regulate various aspects of life without their authority being called into question. In France, absolutism is associated with the likes of Louis XIII, but rather more so with his descendent, King Louis XIV. However, while in theory absolutism granted the king a vast majority if the power and authority, it does not mean that it worked that way in practice. The king still had to answer to God.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In absolutist states, monarchs claimed to rule by divine right.5 Plato believed in rule by philosopher kings. King Louis XIV believed in the divine right of kings. But Louis XIV also believed in the responsibility of the king to live up to the divine appointment. Louis XIV was superior in the sense that the biological descendents created a clear cut designation of the ruler. Whereas Plato 's ambiguous mention of philosopher kings left a free for all civil strife as to who would the "philosopher" should be. The dictionary definition of the word absolutism is, 'A political theory holding that all power should be vested in one ruler or other authority '. Louis XIV believed strongly in this and believed himself to be an absolute ruler. He used various ways to make his mark, beginning with the idea of absolutism as this was an attractive option when his personal rule began in 1661.6 He inherited this concept from his father and believed that he would be a superior ruler by following on this tradition. During the seventeenth-century, Louis constructed a great palace at Versailles, twelve miles outside the city of Paris. It can be argued that Louis XIV had this palace designed to make the abstract political concept of absolutism visible and the idea that the king exercised absolute or unlimited authority over his lands and people.7 Louis ' reign can…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Around the 17th and 18th centuries, political power was a main objective to all rulers. Many monarchs weren’t successful with their attempts to have absolute power, but Louis XIV did, and it was the longest reign in European history. Louis XIV noticed that the qualities to becoming an absolute monarch were to not let servants have too much authority, lowering the power of the nobility, and controlling religions in his kingdom. The main obstacle he saw of getting absolute rule was controlling the power of the nobility(French), but he did accomplish this by slowing weakening the nobility until he had all the power. And is now known as one of the strongest monarchs to have ever lived in Europe.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV and Absolutism

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Over the past hundreds of years, many monarchs have used absolutism to rule over their nations. Louis XIV used absolutism to keep his subjects loyal to him. There were many different aspects in Louis’s absolutism including fear and power. Louis created different materialistic objects and created jobs and laws to keep many of his subjects loyal. He also had many different characteristics that would make different types of people loyal to him. Louis could make his subjects fear him. He could charm his people as well and make his subjects have the urge to do things for him. These were just some of the ways Louis XIV used absolutism to make his subjects loyal.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many kings also believed in divine right, which is the belief that kings derive their right to rule directly from God and are not accountable to their subjects. In document 7 it states that, “King Louis provided amusements for his nobles, and kept an eye on them too.” This means that he moved nobles into his palace at Versailles to watch over almost every move they made, control them, and probably use them as protection. One example of an absolute ruler was King Louis XIV, who was known as the Sun King, ruled had one of the longest rules in European history. He’s well known for spending most of Frances money on himself and having to ask the bank and wealthy people to keep the country going. Another absolute ruler was Ivan the Terrible. In 1560, he created secret police to murder anyone that went against him. Because of the secret police, thousands of people died. This showed that an absolute monarchy spent money endlessly while a democracy might have different views and…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The absolute monarchies began much before the decline of feudalism. Absolutism wasn't a new idea, people like: the Roman Caesars, The…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Absolutism is an ideology, a set of think which one leader, usually a monarch, centralize the power using divine rights, claiming the monarch is chosen by god. When absolutism is being discussed, the European absolute countries in history is often taken as examples. Yet, it is a wonder whether absolutism has appeared in earlier eras in human history or not. It will be intriguing to investigate how absolutism survived through history and how it is still influencing countries in present society, such as the Vatican City and Saudi Arabia. Therefore, with this essay, I will introduce the difference between absolutism in different era in order to see how has it evolved.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Essay 9

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The thesis statement above by Jacques-Benigne Bossuet clearly illustrates the concept or theory of the ‘Divine Right of Kings' which basically argues that certain kings ruled because they were chosen (by God) to do so and that these kings were accountable to no person except God respecting only the fundamental laws. Because the monarch ruled with "absolute" or unshared power, the term ‘absolutism' came about. These kings are said to rule absolutely by the will of God. To oppose the king was equivalent to a rebellion against God. The king therefore was not to be questioned or disobeyed. According to Bossuet, God's purpose in instituting absolute monarchy was to protect and guide the society.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays