Preview

How Did Joseph Stalin's Use Of Power

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2109 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Joseph Stalin's Use Of Power
Stalin and Gorbachev

Shaunee Girven


MR MURPHY

MODERN HISTORY

!1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction………………………………………………………………………… page 3
2.0 Comparative Uses of Power ………………….……………………………………. page 4

2.1 Struggle for Power………………………………………………………….. page 3

2.2 Uses of Power………………………………………………………………. page 4

2.2.1 Stalin’s Uses of Power…………………………………………….. page 4

2.2.2 Gorbachev’s Uses of Power………………………………………. page 4

2.3 End of the USSR..………………………………………………………….. page 5

2.4 Foreign Perspectives…………………………………………………….. page 5 - 6

2.4.1 View of Stalin…………………………………………………….. page 5

2.4.2 View of Gorbachev……………………………………………….. page 6

2.1.1 Stalin’s Rise to Power…………………………………………….. page 3

2.3.1 Gorbachev’s
…show more content…
The source also indicates that Stalin as a leader was ruthless and led based on dictatorship. Stalin helped the country at the cost of his people. “It is believed that during his reign of terror more people were killed than in both the First and Second World Wars combined”. South African History
Online suggests that Stalin was a manipulative leader deceiving the Russian people into believing he was a caring leader when actually the motive was to protect his position as the leader of the Soviet Union. The source corroborates with the first quote as it explains why he killed so many of his own people. “He wanted the Russian people to believe he had their best interest at heart”. Stalin wasn 't hated because the Soviets believed that without him the Soviet
Union would not have won the War. The Education Forum states “Collectivisation of 1928 was seen as a disaster in terms of agricultural production and created widespread peasant opposition”. This source notes that Stalin’s goal for Collectivisation was to strengthen individual lands into collective farms. Stalin was convinced that the replacement of peasant farms with collective farms would increase the food supply (Appendix 1). Over 91%
…show more content…
Although the Russians did not see it at the time, Gorbachev helped stabilise their countries economy for the future through Glasnost and Perestroika. “He believed that the opening up of the political system - essentially democratising it - was the only way to overcome inertia in the political and bureaucratic apparatus”. Weebly states that
Gorbachev was convinced that Glasnost would have an impact on the government and the
Soviet Union itself. Gorbachev wanted to bring freedom to the people but as the Soviets were used to a communist society, this made him lose more support from the people. “Perestroika policy was announced in 1986 and was another attempt to reorganise the economy”. The author of Russiapedia Leaders is showing that Gorbachev is again attempting to restore the economy as the Soviet Union was broke. Gorbachev’s motives were to simply restore the
Soviet Union’s economic status and bring it up to the standards of the west. Through these two political reforms it is suggested that Gorbachev is very likely the reason for the downfall of the Soviet Union.
MR MURPHY

MODERN

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    During The Cold War, There was a total of 4 change in power. Joseph Stalin being the first dictator of The Soviet Union during The Cold War, Nikita Khrushchev being the second, Leonid Brezhnev the third, and Mikhail Gorbachev the final leader of The Soviet Union. “While this meant change the underlying political reality was that the Soviet system did not trust the people. Government was retained in the hand of Party apparatchiks which the public had no role in choosing. Economically there were improvements.” Despite the improvements, living conditions were poor for the citizens of The Soviet Union. “Agriculture remained a major weakness with poor yields”. Although The Soviet try to improve life for people, life was still poor. The economics…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ‘Khrushchev fell from power because he failed to convince the party of the need to carry out fundamental reform in the USSR’…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mikhail Gorbachev took control of the Soviet Union. He believed that the future of the Soviet Union depended on important reforms and began to implement two programs.…

    • 398 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miriam Dobson argues that Khrushchev’s speech was necessary for voicing the ordeals of ordinary people who suffered under Stalinism who would otherwise be unheard: ‘…only the Secret speech allowed their stories to be told’. Stalinism, according to Khrushchev, was associated with ‘an army of willing perpetrators of terror, but also a mentality of fear, subservience, deceit and stifled initiative’. As such, it is also important to recognise that the critique of Stalin had only taken place once Stalin and his system had firmly established control – it was the ruler that had to be condemned, rather than the line of…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin and Purges

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DeJonge Alex. Stalin and the shaping of the Soviet Union. Glasgow: William Collins Sons and Co. Ltd., 1984.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nikita Khrushchev, though not the most likely successor to Stalin, became the leader of the USSR in 1953 and was toppled from power in 1964 after a Coup in which his policies were attacked by his colleagues. They accused him of being contradictory towards Lenin’s teachings, especially in his agricultural and industrial policies, in being an unfitted leader and erratic in his approach, as well as being reckless over the Cuban Missiles Crisis and West Berlin and ignoring advice. The cause of Khrushchev’s downfall is a contentious issue among historians. Some historians such as Martin Page argue that it was as unhappiness among party hardliners with his reforms that led to him losing power. Upon…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He served as first secretary for 18 years, but under his rule the soviet regime decayed year by year, the economy stagnated, falling more behind those of the advanced industrial countries. Workers had little incentive to exert themselves now that punishment was abolished, and as it was cynically put “they pretended to pay us and we pretended to work”. The USSR did not participate in advancements in information technology, which revolutionized western economies. The living standards of ordinary citizens fell below the low minimal norms set by the state, and in the late 1980s nearly one half of the soviet population earned less than 10 dollars a month. Drunkenness was endemic; the soviet republic had the highest rate of alcohol consumption in the world as well as alcoholic deaths. The Russian population which under czarism had grown at the most rapid rate in Europe showed by the 1970s a deficit were more Russians died each year than were born. During that time corruption flourished and to get anything done, one had to bribe officials in charge of goods and services. High posts were sold to the highest bidders, theft of public property was abundant, and Russians became so accustomed to corruption that they were ready to bribe without being sure that it served purpose. The corruption in the entire nation could be summarized in the following popular quote at the time “if you don’t steal from the government, you are stealing from your family.” Economic performance was in decline were the growth rate of GDP already down from more than 5% per year since Kruschev fell from 3.7% to 2.3% by the first half of the…

    • 4825 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was basically a Russian .He was the prime minister from 6may 1941 until his death .…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many different opinions on why the once powerful Soviet Union fell including a stagnant economy, new reform policies, or general dismissal of communist ideology. Many of the issues that were either unresolved or worsened stem from Mikhail Gorbachev reign as General Secretary from 1985 until the collapse in 1991. While there were a plethora of issues surrounding the Soviet Union, Gorbachev seemed to be the focal point of where things went from bad to worse. Though Gorbachev had the Soviet…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin - History

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Even though Stalin’s victory in the power struggle was partly due to his popular policies, it was not just this that allowed Stalin also because of the mistakes made by other rivals and factors that played into his hands. For example Trotsky was a former menshevik which helped Stalin accuse him of not been a true Bolshevik.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin's Great Terror

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His followers loved him so much and were so loyal they would do anything for him, like “If it was necessary to cut you to pieces, [stalin's people] cut you to pieces.” He was very involved with the killing, and if he wasn’t involved he planned it, and watched. If Stalin didn’t kill you he would send you to a gulag. A gulag was labour camp where Stalin would send his enemies. Was it better to live and be sent to a gulag? Or be tortured and die? He would do anything to make sure anyone unloyal to him, a person able to lead, or anyone he disliked would disappear. If he didn’t kill them he might have left them to physically and mentally scarred they couldn’t even imagine disliking Stalin. This was one of the worst events in history, and it went unnoticed by Russia’s own people as it went down.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For most of the 1900’s, the Soviet Union was one of the most powerful countries in the world. They fought in both World Wars and they also helped to defeat the Nazis in World War 2. Even with all of their achievements, the Soviet Union’s government began to disagree with the people and even force their will upon them in the mid to late 1900’s and they finally collapsed in 1991. The collapse of the Soviet Union was caused mainly by internal issues that developed long before 1991, like the government keeping secrets from the people, or the government disagreeing with the people.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Soviet Union was looking to expand their way of life and basically take away liberty, slowly but surely. It may not have seemed so at first, and it is apparent because of the actions of presidents Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter. With their choices to deny containment in the spirit of trade and relations,…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many Historians contributed the fall of Soviet Union directly to Mikhail Gorbachev and his reforms. They argued that Gorbachev’s Glasnost, (openness) and Perestroika, (restructuring) directly led to uprisings within the Soviet Union, and its Soviet republics that brought the downfall of Soviet Union. This is however a very shallow analysis of the downfall of the Soviet Union. For one to truly understand the fall of the Soviet Union one must understand the history of The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), and the political and economic situation of the former empire when Gorbachev took reign. For example the USSR’s stagnating economy compounded with the arms race, ethnic tensions, war in Afghanistan, as well as the communism ideology itself, all played great roles in the downfall of USSR. Gorbachev’s reforms merely torpedoed an already sinking ship, as the Soviet Union was doomed to fail at the moment Stalin took over. Gorbachev’s reforms also played a part in the dissolution of the Soviet Union. He tried to combat all these problems with glasnost and perestroika, however it was too radical at the time and was too little too late. The reforms themselves were flawed, as they were too radical and not properly implemented. Gorbachev’s reforms were literally the polar opposite of the policies of his predecessors. This radical change plunged the USSR into chaos and eventually the fall of the Soviet Union.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Soviet Union

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This collapse has been debated by many historians, whether it was inevitable or it was pressured into collapse. I focused my research on the causes of the collapse. Mainly the information I collected, point more to the fact that it was inevitable. Some causes I found, and are not limited to, include the stagnant economy, reforms made to help the Soviet Union, but hurt it instead, and poor leadership.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays