Preview

How Alexander The Great Conquered Persia

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Alexander The Great Conquered Persia
The Leader of a New Era: How Alexander the Great Conquered Persia/ Greece Today, there is a debate on how Alexander the Great was able to conquer most of his known world. Some people believe it was due to his leadership and ruling capabilities, while others think it was due to Alexander’s adept understanding of strategy and tactics. Even though some people believe that it was his leadership role that helped him manage uprisings, and also allowed him to expand his empire. It was, ultimately, his abilities to think clearly and plan ahead in a war that allowed him to never lose a battle and conquer Persia. The reason he was able to think clearly in battle was due to his revolutionary tactics, sound strategy, and his innovative use of weapons. …show more content…
Also, historian E.W. Davis believes that their greatest weakness was that the Persian army was led by a committee (Mixter 55). This was a disadvantage because a committee does not have the leadership and communication that comes from being led by a leader, and less functionality between individual units of men. Though this still does not explain how an outnumbered and an outclassed army could win against a well-trained and superior army after a river crossing. But overall what helped him in every campaign was his new and focused tactics, that in fact forever changed views on strategy and tactics. A quote from a John Mixter graduate at Bryant college and Salve Regina University, “The Granicus is also worthy of note because it is one of the earliest battles on record that was decided largely by cavalry strength”. This shows us that Alexander came up with revolutionary tactics for cavalry, that were used to conquer Persia/Greece and are still used

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Following the Battle of Gaugamela, Alexander planned on deploying the same tactics used against the Persians during the battle in Issus. In reply, his generals disagreed with repeating that tactic as it would put Alexander in danger, it would leave the left and center unit weaken against Persian, and purpose that Alexander take the fight towards Darius together with his army. Alexander opposed to his general’s idea as he was very firmed on his own belief and reassured his generals that if he is able to immediately take out Darius again like at Issus (Yenne 73). The battle would be over as his non-Persian soldiers would have no motives to fight any more if their ruler had abandoned them. Hence, Alexander and his army marched out onto Gaugamela…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander was tempted to chase after Darius, but with his camp being raided and Parmenion surrounded, Alexander ordered his troops back. He then aided to Parmenion and slaughtered the Persians who were coming back from raiding his camp (“Battle of Gaugamela”). With exemplary leading, strategic planning, and patience, Alexander had earned one of the most decisive and stunning victories…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great’s ability to maintain effective organizational systems and structure and seamlessly communicate and execute strategies were the catalysts of his defeat of Darius’ larger army (Nassar, n.d.). To begin with, Alexander rigorously trained and prepared his troops to fight prior to an actual battle, which enabled him to maintain a small, agile, highly disciplined, and efficient army (History.com, 2009). Furthermore, Alexander’s appointment of commanders to each unit enhanced real time communication and facilitated coordinated disbanding of phalanxes to allow Darius’ cavalry units to pass through the phalanx, where they were attacked by Alexander’s infantry units (Wasson, 2014). Therefore, attacking Darius’s left flank, in conjunction…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian Empire held together a huge empire using a combination of effective ruling techniques. The Persians succeeded where most of the ancient world failed. Persia became successful because of its tolerance, their government, and their prosperous economy. Persia sought out to create a kinder kingdom and did not destroy local cities and states for their own selfish gain.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writer agrees with Denise that Alexander the Great led his troops to win several battles .However, the writer believes that Alexander the Great was both effective and efficient in this battle by the way he used his strategy and planning against King Darius troops.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From a young age, Alexander’s education trained him to be a successful conqueror with an alpha mindset. “Alexander's academic learning was cut short when he was 16. His father brought Alexander to the battlefield to improve his military capabilities” (McGill). Compared to other leaders, Alexander had first hand experience on the battlefield. This improved his knowledge of combat, and likely changed major aspects of Alexander’s strategies and…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question on why Alexander invaded the Persian territory has only been guessed at by historians in the past. The true reason why, may never be known. What is known however is the fact that Alexander had continued what many before him had done, invade the Persian territory.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was only stopped by his exposed men who forced him to return home. His military expertise can be found in the battle of Issus(333 B.C.E) against the persians. During the battle Alexander had started to lose and he almost lost, but in the chaos the king of the persians ran away and they all started to retreat. This gave Alexander the chance and he took it, And he crushed the persians. One of the strategies he would use was to split up his army into three groups and flank the enemy from almost all sides leaving then nowhere to run. Although he was a great military leader he did have his faults and one of them was he was ruthless. It is recorded that he slaterd all males, and enslaves 20,000 women and children, and also let his troops destroy what was left of thebes after he invaded…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander had plans to unite Greece and conquer Persia. He knew it was best to do this, so he tried every play in the book to conquer Persia and surrounding empires. He was skilled in military tactics and battle strategies. His knowledge of good military attacks led him to many conquered empires such as Thebes, Egypt, and eventually, Persia.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How To Attack Gaugamela

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While Darius had a significant advantage in numbers, most of his troops were of a lower quality than Alexander's. The bulk of their infantry were lightly armored and their spears not long enough to counter the much longer sarissa. Overall, Alexander’s army had the advantage in almost every way. Gaugamela was a great battle, a battle won by a great…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page

    Many people think that Alexander the Great was truly great because of all his accomplishments, but not all of the things he did were great. He did lots of cruel things to people and animals just because he wanted to gain more power. Alexander has killed approximately 100,000 people only in four major battles (Alexander’s Legacy Doc E). Alexander was a prince who was born in macedonia of 356 BC. Alexander was very arrogant. He was taught by a philosopher Aristotle. He taught him subjects like, politics, sports, and warfare. Philip, Alexander’s father built the macedonian army into a deadly fighting machine, this sparked alexander’s interest and was eager to to lead the army. And Alexander got his chance to lead at the age of 20, because Philip…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander was great because of his intelligence. In document B it states the story behind the last superior battle Alexander fought and how he used his intelligence to strike at the enemy Prince Porous.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander the Great 20

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    His main conquest was Ambition. Money was a big thing for Alexander because he was in a lot of…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After defeating the Persian army in the battle at Granicus, the army moved south searching for the main force. The main force was led by the ruler of Persia, Darius. The battle happens in a narrow area between the gulf of Issus and mountains on November 5, 333 BC. The macedonian army used its phalanx, and Alexander used his tactics to adapt to the situation. The army had a phalanx in the center, hypaspists on the right, and companion cavalry with Alexander riding with them on the flank. On the left was a mix of heavy and light cavalry, with an infantry in reserve. Far right in the hills, the army had agrarians, elite javelin soldiers, and cavalry. The Macedonian army advances, protecting their flank. Alexander led an attack of the agrarians, and managed to drive off the heavy infantry. Meanwhile the rest of the macedonian cavalry on that flank drove off the persian cavalry. On the opposite flank, the Persian heavy cavalry succeeding in pushing back the weaker cavalry of the Macedonian army. Alexander responded to this by using his infantry. The Macedonians with this infantry put up a defensive line against a possible breakthrough. As the Persian line advanced, placing their flank in the air, they left themselves vulnerable. The Agrarians continued to pursue heavy infantry, while the cavalry turned on the flank of the infantry. Alexander in this moment saw Darius and advanced toward him. He believed that by…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays