Preview

How Does Alexander The Great's Ability To Maintain Effective Military

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
248 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Alexander The Great's Ability To Maintain Effective Military
Alexander the Great’s ability to maintain effective organizational systems and structure and seamlessly communicate and execute strategies were the catalysts of his defeat of Darius’ larger army (Nassar, n.d.). To begin with, Alexander rigorously trained and prepared his troops to fight prior to an actual battle, which enabled him to maintain a small, agile, highly disciplined, and efficient army (History.com, 2009). Furthermore, Alexander’s appointment of commanders to each unit enhanced real time communication and facilitated coordinated disbanding of phalanxes to allow Darius’ cavalry units to pass through the phalanx, where they were attacked by Alexander’s infantry units (Wasson, 2014). Therefore, attacking Darius’s left flank, in conjunction

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Does Alexander the Great Deserve the Title? Alexander the Great, King of Macedon, deserves the title because he was a very powerful man who conquered throughout his life. One of his greatest accomplishments was he spread the Greek culture and language throughout many parts of the world. He took on the position of the King after his father passed away and was able to also accomplish the expansion of his father's empire.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the meantime while Alexander is occupied luring Darius’s cavalry out, the two forces marched towards each other and started a battle. In the midst of the battle it was without a doubt as how Alexander’s general had predicted; Alexander left and center army would be struggling against the Persians and their wagons that had spears pointing out of the wheels. The purpose of the wagons are counter against the phalanx 18 inch spears by having a heavy wagon ramming through the phalanx and sweep any soldiers caught in the spears sticking out of the rims (Yenne 76). While Alexander’s left and center army was struggling against the Persians wagons, Alexander had finally lured Darius’s cavalry long enough and hit a u-turn going forty-five degrees towards the center of the Persian army, where Darius was located in (Yenne 75). And miraculously for Alexander all goes well for him and Darius fell for Alexander same tactic a second time and was faced with Alexander and his cavalry charging toward him after a successful tactic by them.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander came across some of Darius’s scouts and he decided to capture them (“Battle of Gaugamela”). In turn, he learned of any obstacles on the battlefield and most importantly, he learned of Darius’s numbers. Alexander prepared to battle Darius’s large army with his generals overnight, and had came up with many strategies for the fight the next morning. The next day, Alexander’s army set up in their positions and advanced towards the Persians who were waiting for them.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writer agrees with Denise that Alexander the Great led his troops to win several battles .However, the writer believes that Alexander the Great was both effective and efficient in this battle by the way he used his strategy and planning against King Darius troops.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now, instead of simply discussing his most glorious battle and successful expansion of his empire by overthrowing the Persian Empire. And although they were a major success to his rising to power. People must be able to understand exactly how even after defeating his enemies, Alexander ran these new additions to his empire and effected them through cultural influence. While Alexander was exceedingly bright, some may have doubted how he chose to run them. Even after the overthrowing of Darius III, Alexander still wanted to add more to his empire. He even went as far as India to overthrow, which only failed due to homesick soldiers. Thus, this had to be Alexander's greatest flaw, he didn't know when enough was enough. Now, back to subject at…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike his father, Alexander III did manage to survive his reign relatively unscathed, which indicates that he dealt with his problems well, at least in the short term. Alexander III inherited a country fraught with economic difficulties, violent extremists and social tensions. His priority was to maintain his autocratic power and restore the power and influence of the nobility – his most trusted support base. Although he achieved some success, especially with his economic reform, he failed to deal with the key issues facing the Russian people, causing long term tensions that would result in revolution.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand Alexander the Great was not so great because many tactics where inherited from his father,Philip II. Alexander's father had many tactics such as the phalanx, however Alexander decided to improve on his father's idea and make it better and stronger so he could defeat more enemies. The phalanx was his fathers idea but improving on the idea shows that he was intelligent and skilful. This shows that…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was only stopped by his exposed men who forced him to return home. His military expertise can be found in the battle of Issus(333 B.C.E) against the persians. During the battle Alexander had started to lose and he almost lost, but in the chaos the king of the persians ran away and they all started to retreat. This gave Alexander the chance and he took it, And he crushed the persians. One of the strategies he would use was to split up his army into three groups and flank the enemy from almost all sides leaving then nowhere to run. Although he was a great military leader he did have his faults and one of them was he was ruthless. It is recorded that he slaterd all males, and enslaves 20,000 women and children, and also let his troops destroy what was left of thebes after he invaded…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 15 years of fighting, Alexander the Great never lost a battle. Although he did some evil things because his personality and arrogance got the best of him, he made some good decisions for the sake of his empire. Alexander the Great was truly a great leader. He ruled his empire under some pretty good tactics and a great government. So, was he truly a great ruler?…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander’s strength is also shown in Document Three. In the legend of The Battle of Hydaspes, Alexander saw that he was outnumbered by the elephant cavalry so he came up with an elaborate plan. The plan confused his opponents, and was very tricky on his part. The plan worked in the end, even though they were overpowered. Alexander shows his strength mentally and physically when he made his plan and when he followed through with his plan against an elephant cavalry. Alexander acted the way he wanted his men to act, which was with wits, and strength in every…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Well, our opinion is that Alexander the Great is great. He was attacked by the Persian and he successfully defeated them. Alexander moved south along the eastern Mediterranean. Many cities surrender the Alexander the Great. Some of the men that was in the other armies that they were in, transferred to Alexander’s army. In 332 B.C.E Alexander entered the world of egypt, a country that had experienced on and off periods of Persian rule for two centuries. With Mediterranean and Egypt secured, the Persians were deprived of naval bases and Alexander was free to move inland to conquer the eastern half of the Persian Empire. Alexander had sources of 1 million troops to take over states and cities. Darius III on the other hand brought soldiers all over and even beyond his empire. Persian was on a rampage and Alexander continued to battle against them until they…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Document C illustrates how Alexander was able to defeat the Tyre which was a self proclaimed “unconquerable city” because it was built on an island protected with high walls. “ The great city…. Was now utterly destroyed. Her king, Azimilik, and various other notables, including envoys from carthage, had taken refuge in the temple of Melkart, and Alexander spared their lives. The remaining survivors, some 30,000 in numbers, he sold into slavery, Two thousand men of military age were crucified.” (Doc C) Although some might argue he isn't great because the deaths of two thousand military man are quite brutal he did it out of pure leadership in order to finish the battle he started. Alexander stepped up as a leader and was able to lead men into a battle and defeat the unconquerable city. Also In Document C, another battle or march, Alexander shows leadership, “Alexander had ordered that all [expect] those who sought sanctuary were to be slain” (Document C). This shows Alexander was great by leadership because he made the big decision for his troops on what to follow out, even though it was a rough game plan, he stepped up and took charge.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines “great” as, “remarkable in magnitude, degree, or effectiveness; chief or preeminent over others.” Alexander the Great was born to Phillip II, King of Macedonia, in July of 356 BC. Alexander was quickly exposed to a militaristic lifestyle. When his father, Phillip II died, Alexander started his reign at just 20 years old, already with military experience. Alexander would then go on to create the largest empire at the time, earning himself the title, “the Great.” Giving any individual the title of “the Great” is risky, because of varying opinions. Alexander the Great does deserve his title because of his education, military accomplishments, and his courage.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great is often thought of as the greatest military commander that the world has ever seen. He was born in July of 356 B.C to King Philip II of Macedonia and Olympias. Since his youth, Alexander was tutored and trained by great philosophers such as Aristotle and Leonidas. His legacy of greatness started with the taming of the wild horse, Bucephalus. Alexander of Macedonia is worthy of the title, Great, due to his strategic military operations, his expansion of the Greek Empire, and the cultural diffusion of the Greeks across the world.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays