Preview

Hiroshima Ethical Dilemmas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
945 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hiroshima Ethical Dilemmas
The Hiroshima atomic destruction remains a historical uncertainties and ethical dilemmas. The use of atomic bombs marked forever the relationship between the US and Japan, and the controversy over the use of atomic weapons will no doubt continue indefinitely. Historiography and comments on the issue are gigantic. Each generation of Americans and Japanese revisited the issue, and the following will no doubt continue. Indeed, the moral justification for the destruction of two Japanese cities is clear and final. This is indeed what the author of HIROSHIMA trying to trace in his book in which he tries to highlight the reasons for the use of the bomb. The tone of the other epic and trajique rest and Revelle character who in his melodrama remains …show more content…
This decision vien very late because the damage of the Bomble were Priceless "A hundred thousand people Were killed by the atomic bomb, and six thesis Were Among the survivors" (from Hiroshima page 9). In May 1945, after the capitulation of Nazi Germany, the existence of these bombs of a new type was a source of great hope together of great uncertainty for the small number of leaders who knew about it. They hoped that this new and terrible weapon hasten the end of the war with Japan. But then again, many doubts remained about the bomb and its use. Roosevelt has somehow left to Truman's strategy of minimizing the losses in American lives. Indeed, given the number of dead Soviet, German, Chinese, Japanese, English and many others, and taking into account the strength of the Japanese enemy, the number of American deaths during the Second War world was relatively small, about four hundred and twenty Thousands of dead people, compared to the millions or even tens of millions of other belligerents, especially if there are civilian casualties. Beyond its determination to remain true to the legacy of Roosevelt, Truman sought to minimize US casualties because of his own combat experience. Former artillery captain in World War II, he found himself under fire from the enemy, he saw soldiers die before his eyes, including those who were under his command. Truman was therefore in great …show more content…
And even after the end of the war it was difficult for the population to return to their city of origin. "No significant reconstruction or repair work Was Accomplished Because of the slow return of the population; at the end of November 1945 Each of the cities HAD only about hundred and forty Thousands of people ALTHOUGH the ending of the war time immediately Almost partner after the atomic bombings removed much of the incentive of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Truman, as he saw the attack of okinawa in 1944 witnessed how the Japanese would not surrender, they had to capture all 100,000 Japanese soldiers on the island (peace and war book page 152 by Ben Walsh). This lead to the US dropping almost 2000 tons of incendiary grenade from B 29 planes which ensured the US a victory for Truman. Although the Japanese were losing the pacific war, the fire bombs failed to persuade Japan to surrender which made Harry Truman’s decision to drop the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From the information given to Harry Truman of how the Japanese were not willing to surrender, dropping of the atomic bomb was justified as he did it in order to shorten the agony of war and to save American lives. Based on the choices given, Truman had to take the least costly option which was to use this bomb. Furthermore, the bomb was an approach to end Japanese brutality on the asian countries they have colonized. In retrospect, many historians have criticized him as the Japanese were rumoured to be ready to surrender prior to the use of the Atomic…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the bomb would indeed wipe out the enemy troops, who's to say that innocent civilians wouldn’t lose their lives. Truman had to think about that in his decision making process. Would more lives have been saved setting off the bomb? As strong as the atomic bomb was, Truman believed it was the way to go. The initial shock was a couple of miles, but the aftershock covered hundreds of miles more. According to the BBC article, estimates suggested that the final toll was about 140,000, of Hiroshima's 350,000 population, including military personnel and those who died later from radiation. Many also suffered long-term sickness and disability. The bomb in Nagasaki killed nearly 74,000 and a similar number were injured. The bombs ended up killing many civilians and military soldiers, because of how far the bomb and radiation reached. The two atomic bombs left no choice for the Japanese. They surrendered to the Allies on 14 August 1945. Out of the two Japanese depots that were targeted, civilians were also involved and killed. Many people condemned Truman and America over the decision. Politically, many did not want Truman to be any more involved and became careful in who they would put into office. A disadvantage towards this decision was that the surrounding cities suffered extensive damage. Also the home islands were subjected to naval blockades that made food and fuel extremely scarce. Research identified…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This doesn’t change the millions of American soldiers’ lives he saved when he made that decision. The dropping of the bomb ended the war in a dead halt and saved more lives than it ruined. This was a significant point in history where everything changed and a new path was paved for a new era of firepower that had never been dreamed of before. The reality was that nobody thought that someone was going to drop the atomic bomb but Truman proved them wrong and showed that when America had to get business done that he would take the necessary actions. One thing Truman did accomplish that was a good thing, there has not been atomic bomb dropped since that day on August 9, 1945 because the world seen the destruction and chaos that the atomic bomb carried with…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The money that was involved in the creation of the atomic bomb was tremendous. It was massive, if it wasn’t experimented on then it was believed that the Americans would be highly disappointed. After the Japanese attack, President Truman took that as a great opportunity to use the bombing. The outcome was successful because it caused an atrocious amount of deaths in…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the use of the bomb killed many innocent civilians it also saved many lives because if the bomb had not dropped the war would have gone on with more air raids and more attacks on cities and many soldiers on both sides would have died. If the US had not dropped the atomic bomb the nuclear arms race would have would have went on and the standards would have been different and it may not have been just two cities but an entire country.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A key reason for Truman’s decision to drop the Atomic Bomb was the alternative options were not proper solutions. Dropping the bomb wasn’t the only considered option. The main “runner up” was a mass invasion of Japan. This idea was very dangerous. The casualties for the US were projected to be over 1,000,000 soldiers, and 5,000,000 japanese soldiers. One of the other alternatives was the idea of displaying to true power of the atomic weapon to Japan through a test. Such an idea had way too many flaws to be applicable. There was only enough Plutonium and Uranium available to the US for two bombs, (Little Boy, Fat Man). Also this idea was a risk because if the weapon did not detonate, the US would look even weaker to the Japanese. The idea of barricading the Japanese was also a considered solution, using Naval vessels to trap the Japanese in until the US “starved them out”. The fault in this idea was the unreasonable amount of time and resources it would consume. After weighing the options, and thinking it through carefully, President Truman made the correct choice to drop the bomb.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “On the morning of August 6, 1945, the American B-29 Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later another B-29, Bock’s Car, released one over Nagasaki. Both caused enormous casualties and physical destruction.” (Maddox 1). These disastrous events have weighted upon the American conscience ever since that day in history. Even though there are some people that disagree with the dropping of the atomic bomb, President Truman’s decision was very critical because he prevented the loss of many American lives, Japanese soldiers fought with no notion of ever surrendering, and it brought an end to a bloody war.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems that according to revisionists, Harry Truman had other alternatives to reach his goals. The atomic bombs were not the only means towards the surrendering of Japan. He had the option of going ahead with a conventional bombing or strategic bombing which would have a significant impact: if not more, a little less than the atomic bomb. The argument is that if he had decided to use conventional bombing or strategic bombing, Japan would not have had to go through dangerous amounts of radiation levels which are still producing abnormalities in birth to this day. Also, revisionists claim that Truman’s decision was motivated by USSR. Historians have argued the claim that Truman had an interest in impressing Stalin, since USSR was about to invade Japan. Japan had already been defeated and its military and air force was exhausted. Another reason for Truman to launch the atomic bombs was to cover for the Manhattan Project. The project was created to build atomic bombs and consumed billions of US dollars. To show, or rather create a façade of the progress, the atomic bombs had to be displayed so the Americans would feel that the money was put to good…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On the 6th of August 1945 the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan killing 70,000 citizens instantly and a further 10,000 perished from burns and radiation sickness1. President Harry Truman was wrong to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. One of his reasons for dropping the bomb was to end an ongoing war; his reason behind this was that to end the war in such a way would cease anymore-continuous damage2. Although this shows good intentions he did not decrease any damage in anyway and was in fact being quite selfish. The only damage that was ceased was the damage being put upon the United States which can be argued that as he was the president, was right to be only protecting his own country. He had many ideas put forth that were far less damaging. A few of the ideas put forward were to invade Japanese mainland, hold a demonstration of the destructive power of the atomic bomb for Japanese dignitaries, bomb and blockade the islands, wait for the Soviet Union to enter the war on August 15th or to compromise peace. He did not give any of these ideas a chance to go through with them. I believe he did not wait for the Soviet Union to enter and wanted to drop the atomic bomb as a warning to them, he wanted them to see how powerful the United States was and was not to be messed with. Ethically what he did was wrong, not only had Hiroshima become inhabitable for years after but also people affected by the radiation were to be affecting generations to come. Miscarriages, stillbirths and birth defect rates were increasing significantly, many children were born with mental disabilities, stunted growth or a condition called microcephaly where their heads were unusually small3. Before giving the order to drop the bomb he did not have tests carried out to see the extent of radiation sickness the bomb could cause and had no idea of how far the…

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman also had to think about the lives of the Americans. If the United States did not drop this nuclear bomb, then the war would have lasted longer and the American soldiers would have had to continue to fight the Japanese in the air, water, and ground. This would have caused many more American casualties, and would’ve hurt the American military in the long run. While Truman was taking all these consequences into consideration he received a letter from General Groves stating, “If the United States continues to lead in the development of atomic energy weapons, its future will be much safer and the chances of preserving world peace greatly increased.” General Groves was correct in his statement saying that the atomic bomb would be much safer in the future.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then the question of the ethical use of the bomb emerged. Many scholars agreed that “it is clear that alternatives to the bomb existed and that Truman and his advisers knew it.” Men like Barton J. Bernstein began to counter many arguments for the use of the atomic bomb, including using the bomb to intimidate Russia. https://www.nps.gov/articles/trumanatomicbomb.htmHowever, the Truman was given four alternatives which included conventional bombing of the Japanese home islands, ground invasion of the Japanese home islands, and demonstration of the Atomic Bomb on an unpopulated/populated area. Moreover, Japan would have collapsed before the invasion due to its internal problems of political, military, and the economy.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the bomb did not work as planned, General Marshall predicted that in order to do the same amount of damage inflicted by the bomb, they would need over half a million Americans to risk their lives in order for Japan to surrender. President Truman knew very well that the dropping of the atomic bomb would cause an unimaginable amount of damage, but he knew that in order to end the war and save American lives, it was worth the risk of not knowing what would truly happen. Even though Truman could not predict what would follow after the dropping of the atom bomb, he had a good sense of the effects mainly because of the test in New Mexico. Besides that, Truman knew for sure that the bomb would end the war whereas if he were to wait it out with the sea blockade, he would have to run the risk of losing even more Americans. The Secretary of War briefly mentions, “...no indication of any weakening in the Japanese determination to fight.”…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Takaki's Hiroshima

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Although WW II ended over 50 years ago there is still much discussion as to the events which ended the War in the Pacific. The primary event which historians attribute to this end are the use of atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although the bombing of these cities did force the Japanese to surrender, many people today ask "Was the use of the atomic bomb necessary to end the war?" and more importantly "Why was the decision to use the bomb made?" Ronald Takaki examines these questions in his book Hiroshima.…

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb was a difficult decision for one man to make. However, before he could ever make that difficult decision he first had to be told the weapon was even an option. The atomic bomb was a closely guarded secret that only a select few even at the highest levels in the government had knowledge of. So when the decision was made to use the bomb it was made to save the lives of not only American servicemen but those of the Japanese empire as well. That faithful decision did take the lives of many civilians of Japan but it also saved more that it ever took. President Truman sacrificed a few to save the many which is extremely hard to accept when the majority of those killed were civilians of all ages…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays