Preview

Four Arguments For The Ethical Use Of The Atomic Bomb

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Four Arguments For The Ethical Use Of The Atomic Bomb
Then the question of the ethical use of the bomb emerged. Many scholars agreed that “it is clear that alternatives to the bomb existed and that Truman and his advisers knew it.” Men like Barton J. Bernstein began to counter many arguments for the use of the atomic bomb, including using the bomb to intimidate Russia. https://www.nps.gov/articles/trumanatomicbomb.htmHowever, the Truman was given four alternatives which included conventional bombing of the Japanese home islands, ground invasion of the Japanese home islands, and demonstration of the Atomic Bomb on an unpopulated/populated area. Moreover, Japan would have collapsed before the invasion due to its internal problems of political, military, and the economy. These possible alternatives to end the world gives insight into the lengths the United States would go to prove their dominance during a war. …show more content…
Japan had been already aware of the retaliation that was made upon the United States, so having Russia enter the mix would also convince Japan of their “inevitability of complete defeat.” Truman even included his perception of Stalin decision to enter the war by realizing the importance of how fast the war will end and prevent more lives to be taken away. He realized that the invasion was an option, but the Japanese would admit to unconditional surrender for it meant a national extinction. This further made Truman convinced that the bomb was necessary in order to save lives in the invasion. http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30/the-bomb-didnt-beat-japan-stalin-did/ However, Truman was aware of the effects it would have on the Russians’ plans in Manchuria, which was invade and declare war. This event meant that Stalin could “no longer act as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In President Harry Truman speech to inform his citizens on how he was going to end WWII, he said the U.S. “shall destroy their docks, their factories, and their communications. Let there be no mistake; we shall completely destroy Japan’s power to make war” (Harry Truman). The U.S. made it very clear that their main goal was to force Japan to surrender and that they would stop at nothing to make that happen. Evidently, even using the world’s first nuclear weapons in war did not limit the United States. After the destruction and devastation the bombs had caused, Japanese officials had no other choice but to unconditionally surrender, and announce an end to the war. Though there is still a debate today about whether the bomb was necessary to end…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman, as he saw the attack of okinawa in 1944 witnessed how the Japanese would not surrender, they had to capture all 100,000 Japanese soldiers on the island (peace and war book page 152 by Ben Walsh). This lead to the US dropping almost 2000 tons of incendiary grenade from B 29 planes which ensured the US a victory for Truman. Although the Japanese were losing the pacific war, the fire bombs failed to persuade Japan to surrender which made Harry Truman’s decision to drop the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From the information given to Harry Truman of how the Japanese were not willing to surrender, dropping of the atomic bomb was justified as he did it in order to shorten the agony of war and to save American lives. Based on the choices given, Truman had to take the least costly option which was to use this bomb. Furthermore, the bomb was an approach to end Japanese brutality on the asian countries they have colonized. In retrospect, many historians have criticized him as the Japanese were rumoured to be ready to surrender prior to the use of the Atomic…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Truman dropped the a bomb because the military entering japan would of caused to many casualties. So he had the a bomb created to save lives. I do agree with do agree with truman on dropping the a bomb. The a bomb being dropped did cause the death of many innocent Japanese civilians, i will say. The death of those people saved the lives of thousands of Americans, it sounds harsh, but it was either us or them.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By dropping the atomic bombs it was possible that it could prevent Russia from trying to invade or possibly try to take over the United States on down the line. This could have helped push Truman’s decision to drop the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political factors prevailed over military and humanitarian considerations in the decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. "The concerns of top American leaders about the Soviet Union's future actions had the most significant influence on President Truman's deliberations on whether or not to drop the atomic bomb on Japan."(Bill Gordon) If America did not drop the bomb in order to demonstrate its military superiority, American leaders had concerns that the Soviet Union would occupy Manchuria and would share the occupation of Japan with the U.S., especially if the Japanese surrendered several weeks or months after the Soviet Union's entry into the war against Japan on August 8, 1945. In addition, American leaders believed that dropping of the bomb would strengthen their position in future communications with the Soviet Union concerning their field of influence in Eastern Europe.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems that according to revisionists, Harry Truman had other alternatives to reach his goals. The atomic bombs were not the only means towards the surrendering of Japan. He had the option of going ahead with a conventional bombing or strategic bombing which would have a significant impact: if not more, a little less than the atomic bomb. The argument is that if he had decided to use conventional bombing or strategic bombing, Japan would not have had to go through dangerous amounts of radiation levels which are still producing abnormalities in birth to this day. Also, revisionists claim that Truman’s decision was motivated by USSR. Historians have argued the claim that Truman had an interest in impressing Stalin, since USSR was about to invade Japan. Japan had already been defeated and its military and air force was exhausted. Another reason for Truman to launch the atomic bombs was to cover for the Manhattan Project. The project was created to build atomic bombs and consumed billions of US dollars. To show, or rather create a façade of the progress, the atomic bombs had to be displayed so the Americans would feel that the money was put to good…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Truman could have relied on the relentless and devastating B-29 firebombing raids on the Japan city. Also Truman could have combined with the naval blockade to wear down Japanese resistance and force their surrender. Clearly there was other options to defeat japan then dropping a bomb and killing innocent…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Bomb Dbq

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U.S. President Harry S. Truman publicly announced his decision to support the development of the hydrogen bomb, a weapon theorized to be hundreds of times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped on Japan during World War II. He approved of the funding for the nuclear weapon because of several events prior to his public announcement. One of the reasons was the fact that the United States had lost its nuclear supremacy when the Soviet Union successfully detonated an atomic bomb at their test site in Kazakhstan in 1949. Another reason why he decided to fund experiments for nuclear weapons is because the British and U.S. intelligence discovered that Klaus Fuchs, a top-ranking scientist in the U.S. nuclear program, was a spy for the Soviet Union.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason Truman made the right decision of dropping the bomb was because Japan was resistant to give up the fight. In all honesty, we tried. We sent them a warning but, according to Henry L. Stimson, Secretary of War “Suzuki rejected the Potsdam Ultimatum by announcing it was “unworthy of public notice”” (Stimson 49). The warning was used to warn Japan the consequences if they did not surrender.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It would have turned into a global war. Hundreds of thousands of americans would have been killed. Truman and his advisors made the only decision they had. The decision to drop the bomb was not just “a simple yes.” For Truman, the choice if he was going to use the atom bomb or not was the hardest choice of his life.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Japanese leaders were very ruthless and it was against the Japanese culture to give up. For example, “Thousands of suicide missions by kamikaze pilots who tried to crash their planes into U.S. warships seemed additional proof of Japanese fantacism”. When Japan refused to give up there was only so much the U.S. could do. When in office Truman argued, “That the use of the atomic bomb was necessary to avoid an invasion in Japan that would have cost hundreds of thousands of lives”. It is quite possible that Truman may have thought that the atomic bomb could also be used to intimidate other countries like the Soviet Union and the axis powers, but his main focus was the United States at that particular moment in time. There was no winning in Truman’s situation because he was basically choosing who lived and who died. Truman had to choose between possibly losing the war and hundreds of thousands of more men and dropping the atomic bomb on innocent civilians. His actions were not based on the sole purpose of intimidating other countries, but to end the war in the best possible manor without sacrificing more Americans lives. So yes the United States could have quite possible defeated the Japanese, but “recent research shows that bombs were the shock that allowed the emperor and peace advocates to overcome military leaders who wanted to fight to the…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The President’s actions are very crucial to the benefit and future of the U.S., so if Truman thought it was a good idea to mention something that was fairly important as if it weren’t a big deal, he was sadly mistaken. In Text 4, it states that Stalin had no special knowledge of any type of ongoing research of the atomic bomb between the U.S. and Britain, which alone could destroy the Soviet relationship. Truman’s carelessness and immaturity had potential to put everyone in…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Not only were there many factors to be considered in how and where to use the atomic weapon but also reasons why. The main reason President Truman stated was to end the war quickly and to save American lives; he saw the land invasion planned…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays