Preview

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Research Paper

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2140 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hiroshima And Nagasaki Research Paper
The goal of the investigation is to determine whether the use of nuclear weapons on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by U.S. President Truman was the best option to end World War II. The investigation will begin by researching other options available to President Truman, which were debated during the war. Then Truman’s options will be analysed for limitations, such as real-life practicality, as well as reliability of the source which presented the options. Some of the issues which will be examined in this investigation are why both the naval blockade and continued bombing was not an option and why the nuclear bomb was the logical choice over an invasion. Two sources that will be evaluated due to their large amount of usable information …show more content…
To make matters worse the Japanese government ordered civilians to take up arms and to defend to the death. With these two issues arriving the estimated death toll arrived at up to a million. With these horrifying odds, the whole goal of Operation Downfall to produce a quick surrender was now even in debate, the fighting on the Japanese Islands may last a very long time. However with a naval siege or B-29 bombing possibly dragging on for years the invasion was still the only considered option. However even the land invasion could cause long term issues; if Japan wasn’t defeated quickly the Soviet Union may also invade setting up even more …show more content…
Hiroshima and Nagasaki –Fire from the Sky. Minneapolis: Compass Point Books, 2006.

Raico, Ralph. “Hiroshima and Nagasaki”. Lew Rockwell.com. August 6th 2004. [online] http://www.lewrockwell.com/raico/raico22.html

White, Matthew. “Source List and Detailed Death Tolls for the Twentieth Century Hemoclysm”. 2005. [online] http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm#Second

Stimson, Henry. “The Decision to use the Atomic Bomb” The Association for Asian Studies. [online] http://www.aasianst.org/EAA/StimsonHarpers.pdf

“The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki” The Avalon Project. Yale Law School, Lillian Goldman Law Library. December 2008. [online] http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/mpmenu.asp

Alperovitz, Gar. The Decision to use the Atomic Bomb Part II, Hiroshima -Was it Necessary? July 25, 2005. [online] http://www.doug-long.com/ga2.htm

Kemble, Mike. “Why America Was Right to Drop the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima & Nagasaki” The Kemble Kollection. January 2009. [online] http://www.mikekemble.com/ “World War II: Combatants and Casualties (1937 - 45)”. December 2008. [online]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as “the atomic bomb,” was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a “purely technical demonstration” to induce surrender. Other scientists believed that the use of the atomic bomb will improve international prospects in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon (Doc G). Thus, the United States dropped the atomic bomb to both force Japan’s unconditional surrender and to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hiroshima Research Paper

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On August 6th, 1945, the world was forever changed when the world’s first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. The attack was made as an attempt to end World War 2, and it succeeded at a devastating price. John Hersey’s Hiroshima depicts six different accounts of victims of the bomb. The journalistic novel tells how each of the people began their day, how they survived the explosion, the response, and where they were 40 years later. Each account is different, and they all represent the various ways that the bomb hurt the people. These six individual catastrophes illustrate the horrible effects of atomic bombs and how the use of them should not be even considered by any empathetic human being.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nadesan Satyendra - "Hiroshima and Nagasaki the Worst Terror Attacks in Human History - Tamilnation, January, 1, 2009 http://www.tamilnation.org/humanrights/hiroshima.htm…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: History.com Staff. “Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” History.com. A+E Networks. 2009. Web. 30 Apr. 2014.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "The Decision to Drop the Bomb." Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 17 Oct. 2014. <http://www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp>.…

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1945 began as a year of increasing tensions between countries as the war extended onto its sixth year. Military groups of the various countries involved were now beginning to seriously consider the conclusion of the war in terms of how the global ceasefire would be carried out and frankly, who would win. After the defeat of the Axis Powers in Europe, the focus had been turned towards the war in Asia and the Pacific Regions in which the Allied Forces of Great Britain, Australia and the USA were in conflict with the Axis power of Japan and her partners. Following the urge to end the war, the ‘Big Three’ made up of the three leaders of the major Allied Forces; Churchill, Stalin and Truman met for what is known as the Potsdam Conference to discuss ‘post-war world’ and as a result, the Potsdam Declaration was written giving the Japanese an opportunity to surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction”. Despite this opportunity, the Japanese chose to ignore the warning, thus, the US decided to administer the use of their newly developed nuclear weapons and drop the atomic bombs on Japan with both hope and belief that the Japanese would be forced to surrender and thus, ending the war on American terms. At the time, there was massive speculation surrounding the attack. However, the USA had entirely justifiable reasons behind the attack; therefore, they should have dropped the bombs on Japan. Firstly, Japan had been given the opportunity to surrender on peaceful terms but refused due to military being in control of the nation. Secondly, the only alternative was an invasion on Japan; however this action would not end lightly with predictions of huge casualties on the Americans’ part. Furthermore, the Japanese surrendered within a week of the dropping of the bombs proving the effectiveness of the USA’s actions.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which means, the continuance of the conventional wars would have prolonged the war, making larger expenditure. On the ground of the massive sizes of each troops, However, this report did not include the casualties in the Japanese side, and any additional costs such as individual consumption. Which means, utilizing atomic weapons can be resulted in less casualties, so it was inevitable for the Unites States of America to not follow the conventional wars, but to launch atomic bombs. If United States’ army simply attacked Japan with no atomic weapons, it would have led to millions of casualties for both sides, and copious money to restore the army. By considering this, the continuation of ordinary war would have costed much more, and this validates that the United States’ action was unjustifiable to a smaller…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hiroshima is a heart-wrenching, eye opening book. This book spent less time concentrating on the historical aspects of the atomic bomb, and instead focused on the devastation that the bomb invoked upon Hiroshima, and its citizens. Hiroshima really worked to explain the havoc that the atomic bomb caused to the people that lived in the city, and how the effects of the bomb lingered for years after the war was over. Hiroshima followed the lives of six individuals, explained all the destruction that they witnessed and depicted their reactions to the hardships they had to endure.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hiroshima Outline

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A. Restate Thesis: Clearly the atomic bombing of Japan was justified because of the tremendous amount of lives, both Japanese and American, which would have been lost in a conventional invasion. The Japanese fighting style also precipitated the need for drastic measures to be taken to bring…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The thesis states the petition made on July 4, 1945, to the president of the United States drafted by author Leo Szilard and cosigned by scientist of the atomic bomb committee to consider the consequences of using the atomic bomb. The organization and structure of the writing brings a strong message about the devastation an atomic bomb would do to any city in the hands of our Army, but ultimately by our Commander and Chief who has the power to use it (Szilard).…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Dropping the Bomb: Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Key Question." World History: The Modern Era. ABC-CLIO, 2013. Web. 1 May 2013…

    • 2169 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some people are under the belief that Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was because of the nature of the war against Japan. During this time of conflict, Americans believed that the war, itself, was a racial war and the war was also a campaign for revenge because of the attack on Pearl Harbor. In the article “Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Bomb,” the author Marc Rothenberg…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Truman Decision

    • 5419 Words
    • 22 Pages

    President Harry S. Truman decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan is perhaps the most controversial act of policy in United States history. One of the many different reasons given for the use of this weapon was the shock effect it would produce in the Japanese foreign policy circle. While the shock of the Japanese will be discussed later, it is important to note that it had a similar effect on the west. This shock effect has caused countless authors to speculate as to the motivation behind, and effects of this revolutionary weapon.…

    • 5419 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays