Preview

The Consequences Of Using The Atomic Bombs

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
271 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Consequences Of Using The Atomic Bombs
The thesis states the petition made on July 4, 1945, to the president of the United States drafted by author Leo Szilard and cosigned by scientist of the atomic bomb committee to consider the consequences of using the atomic bomb. The organization and structure of the writing brings a strong message about the devastation an atomic bomb would do to any city in the hands of our Army, but ultimately by our Commander and Chief who has the power to use it (Szilard).
The point the author was trying to convey was the implication and use of the atomic bomb to the president. The scientist wanted the president to consider alternates means of not using the bomb, in hopes the Japanese will surrender, but if they don’t, than it lies on the president to
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bergamini's Atomic Diplomacy
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bergamini's Atomic Diplomacy

    In addition, Bergamini returns to several of Butow’s traditional arguments to prove his claims. Agreeing with Butow’s statement that the use of the bomb would leave Japan “practically powerless”, Bergamini writes that the atomic bomb lead to Emperor Hirohito’s decision to surrender. Returning to Butow’s claims Bergamini expands the traditionalist perspective by examining the influence that the atomic bomb had on emperor Hirohito’s decision to terminate the war. Providing evidence to his claims, Bergamini writes that while Hirohito believed that Japan could continue the war until the fall of 1945. He affirms the traditional opinion that the atomic bomb motivated the surrender by quoting Hirohito’s remarks to General MacArthur. Citing Hirohito’s statement that the atomic bomb “gave Japan an excuse to surrender”, the author offers historians with an additional account to consider for what motivated Japan’s surrender. Bergamini’s statements advance the traditionalist view of Japan’s motive to surrender by demonstrating Hirohito’s power in starting the war with the United States. Leaving historians to consider the influence of the emperor, the author shows how the atomic bomb moved Hirohito to…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The War Against Jap Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb '
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing The War Against Jap Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb '

    The first option would allow President Truman to end the war peacefully, and it would have also allowed the Japanese to withdraw from the war without shame to their leader and save the thousands of Japanese individuals by not making the United States have to make the choice of dropping the atomic bombs. This option would have let Truman show that “We as Americans have not sunk to the level of our enemies” “We should end the war now in a manner that reflects the value we place on the sanctity of human life and the dignity of the individual”. The author gives Truman a second option and this option approaches the war in the Pacific with a demonstration of the atomic bomb in efforts to force the Japanese to surrender without condition. This includes the uprising of the Manhattan Project which gave the United States the “weapon of almost inconceivable power” with the scare tactics of the demonstration this gives the Japanese leaders an idea of what would…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Truman Decisions
    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Truman Decisions

    During World War II, the Japanese and Americans were at war. Japan had an advantage over American military troops with a greater number of troops being put out into the war. On the other hand, American troops and military bases had a technological advantage, which ultimately helped the Americans succeed during the war. President Truman made one of the most difficult decisions in American history. Truman’s decision would kill many Japanese soldiers but would save many of the Americans. An atomic bomb would be the last resort, which would wipe out countless miles of land, military bases, and anyone who was close by. As Truman had to think about the pros and cons of this decision, it was ultimately Truman’s say so in whether to proceed and…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros Of Constructing An Atomic Bomb
    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros Of Constructing An Atomic Bomb

    In August of 1939, President F. D. Roosevelt was made aware of the possibility that German scientists were racing to construct an atomic bomb. He was also warned that Hitler would be more than willing to resort to such a weapon. Roosevelt, in response to this set up the Advisory Committee on Uranium, which consisted of both military and civilian representatives. In order to reach their own advancements in the nuclear field faster than Germany they were to study the current state of research on uranium and to recommend an appropriate role for the federal government. At Columbia University a limited military funding for isotope separation and the work on chain reactions were performed by Enrico Fermi and Leo…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki
    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Truman Dropped The Atomic Bomb
    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Why Truman Dropped The Atomic Bomb

    This investigation evaluates whether or not the dropping of the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary to make Japan surrender unconditionally. To assess the extent to which the deployment of nuclear weapons affected the Japanese decision to surrender unconditionally and if Japan was already prepared to do this prior to the use of the atomic bombs. The details and motivations of the United States to drop the bombs are explored as well as Japan’s peace negotiations with the United States and their progress prior to the U.S. choosing to use the bombs. Actions of the United States and Japan not related to the end of World War 2 are not assessed in this investigation.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Leo Szilard Petition Analysis
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leo Szilard Petition Analysis

    Leo Szilard along with other scientists wrote a petition to the President of the United States. This petition addressed the concern of using nuclear weapons against the Japanese, for fear of future usage of nuclear weapons in war (Szilard). Although he was a brilliant nuclear physicist, his petition was based on his understanding of nuclear physics, the petition showed a great concern for humanity, however, it lacked the essential elements of an effective argument and was plagued with logical fallacies.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Truman's Decision To Prevent The Atomic Bombing
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Truman's Decision To Prevent The Atomic Bombing

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb
    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Truman Had the Right to Drop the Atomic Bomb

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    The atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used in World War 2 to defeat Japan. America could have used other alternatives then the deadly atomic bomb. President Truman should of waited a few more weeks for russia to declare war on Japan. The thought of invasion by both of America and Russia probably had an even more scared effect on the Japanese government then the Atomic Bombs. America could of also continue the conventional bombings and blockade.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing

    McCloy felt with the intention of the Japanese that they would have surrendered with no use of the Atomic Bomb if the U.S. had a moment to consent them to defend themselves and maintain their emperor. Technically, in this incidence, the Atomic Bomb was to be avoided, however with their pronouncement, Japan was not particularly supporting the thoroughness of deliberation and the vigor thought that the president of the United States was enforced to have a judgment before and the consequence of this was taken absent. Then he gave examples that deciphered his opinion that he did not consider under current circumstances that the existing in the U.S. whose evaluation of the percent of the success of any including program is worth a great transaction compared to what…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs
    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs

    The only military use of atomic weapons has been on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and almost certainly brought a prompt conclusion to WW2. However, the question of whether it was necessary is still hotly debated 70 years after the event. The answer is no it wasn’t necessary, although it is not as simple as you may think because if I had just been a soldier fighting in New Guinea or if I was a POW starving on the Thai-Burma railway [1] then answer is yes it was necessary. Necessary can have various meanings though such as indispensable or requisite, but also mean acting from need. The question becomes very problematic or ambiguous if one uses both meanings as again we get a yes and no.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs
    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs

    “Science has taught us how to put the atom to work. But to make it work for good instead of for evil lies in the domain dealing with the principals of human duty. We are now facing a problem more of ethics than physics.” - Bernard M Baruch. There were two atomic bombs that were dropped during World War II. There were few survivors after the atomic bombs were dropped. Both of the atom bombs had nicknames. They were dropped three days apart from each other. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. The second was dropped on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs are what ended the war.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ronald Takaki's Hiroshima
    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Ronald Takaki's Hiroshima

    Although WW II ended over 50 years ago there is still much discussion as to the events which ended the War in the Pacific. The primary event which historians attribute to this end are the use of atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although the bombing of these cities did force the Japanese to surrender, many people today ask "Was the use of the atomic bomb necessary to end the war?" and more importantly "Why was the decision to use the bomb made?" Ronald Takaki examines these questions in his book Hiroshima.…

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Petition to the President
    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Petition to the President

    In the Article “A Petition to the United States President” Leo Szilard, the author expresses his concern about the use of atomic power. Szilard is a scientist who works with atomic power, along with some other scientist they were concern of the use of atomic bomb during the war. He discusses how the use of atomic bomb is not a good idea. He brings up some point about the use atomic bombs and how it will affect the outcome the long term of use of more powerful weapons.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics