Hamlet And Laertes
Hamlet Essay
Morals can be defined as a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. Throughout life, people are forced to make decisions, and morals are always a contributing factor to determining the resolution. The life or death decision of killing a human is the moral struggle Hamlet deals with throughout the play. Hamlet and Laertes’ morals on avenging their father’s death are different, and the two characters show the varying beliefs of human beings. The tragedy of Hamlet is about seeking revenge, but vengeance ends up killing both Hamlet and Laertes, so Shakespeare suggests that vengeance leads to the downfall of a person's morals.
Following the death of King Hamlet, Hamlet …show more content…
Take thy fortune.
Thou find’st to be too busy is some danger. (III.iv.37-40).
Shakespeare shows the downfall of human morals after vengeance is made. Hamlet acts, and attempts to seek revenge, but instead kills an innocent person. Due to this incident, Laertes is now forced to seek revenge on Hamlet to avenge his father's murder. Both Hamlet and Laertes need to avenge their father's murders, but their attempts of gaining revenge kills them at the end of the play.
As a result of Polonius’s murder, Laertes is forced to avenge his father’s death, just like Hamlet. Although the two characters both need to seek revenge, Laertes is determined to avenge his father as quickly as he can, unlike Hamlet. After being notified of his father’s death, Laertes returns to Denmark to seek vengeance. Upon his return, Laertes immediately begins plotting the revenge on Hamlet with the help of Claudius. After Claudius’s plan to have Hamlet killed in England fails, Laertes and Claudius create a new plan to murder Hamlet, Laertes says:
And so have I a noble father lost,
A sister driven into desp’rate terms,
Whose worth, if praises may go back again
Stood challenger on mount of all the …show more content…
But my revenge will come.(IV.vii.27-31).
The immediate plotting of vengeance shows the difference between the foils. Shakespeare uses Laertes to identify how morals are broken when one is to apply vengeance. Laertes and Claudius create a master plan to have Laertes secretly murder Hamlet during a fencing match, but although the two thought out their plan, Hamlet, Laertes, and Claudius are killed along with Gertrude. Following the deaths of the characters, Horatio announces:
...give order that these
Morals can be defined as a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. Throughout life, people are forced to make decisions, and morals are always a contributing factor to determining the resolution. The life or death decision of killing a human is the moral struggle Hamlet deals with throughout the play. Hamlet and Laertes’ morals on avenging their father’s death are different, and the two characters show the varying beliefs of human beings. The tragedy of Hamlet is about seeking revenge, but vengeance ends up killing both Hamlet and Laertes, so Shakespeare suggests that vengeance leads to the downfall of a person's morals.
Following the death of King Hamlet, Hamlet …show more content…
Take thy fortune.
Thou find’st to be too busy is some danger. (III.iv.37-40).
Shakespeare shows the downfall of human morals after vengeance is made. Hamlet acts, and attempts to seek revenge, but instead kills an innocent person. Due to this incident, Laertes is now forced to seek revenge on Hamlet to avenge his father's murder. Both Hamlet and Laertes need to avenge their father's murders, but their attempts of gaining revenge kills them at the end of the play.
As a result of Polonius’s murder, Laertes is forced to avenge his father’s death, just like Hamlet. Although the two characters both need to seek revenge, Laertes is determined to avenge his father as quickly as he can, unlike Hamlet. After being notified of his father’s death, Laertes returns to Denmark to seek vengeance. Upon his return, Laertes immediately begins plotting the revenge on Hamlet with the help of Claudius. After Claudius’s plan to have Hamlet killed in England fails, Laertes and Claudius create a new plan to murder Hamlet, Laertes says:
And so have I a noble father lost,
A sister driven into desp’rate terms,
Whose worth, if praises may go back again
Stood challenger on mount of all the …show more content…
But my revenge will come.(IV.vii.27-31).
The immediate plotting of vengeance shows the difference between the foils. Shakespeare uses Laertes to identify how morals are broken when one is to apply vengeance. Laertes and Claudius create a master plan to have Laertes secretly murder Hamlet during a fencing match, but although the two thought out their plan, Hamlet, Laertes, and Claudius are killed along with Gertrude. Following the deaths of the characters, Horatio announces:
...give order that these