Preview

[“Guilty but Mentally Ill vs Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
[“Guilty but Mentally Ill vs Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity
What great differences between the two terms of “guilty but mentally ill” vs “not guilty by reason of insanity” The guilty but mentally ill can get the treatment needed in a mental institution but will need to complete the penalty once the treatment is finished. The not guilty by reason of insanity” gets away without serving any penalty and can commit the same crime again or a worst one if not watch carefully.

“Guilty but mentally ill vs Not guilty by reason of insanity” Dina F has pleated “guilty but mentally ill and waived her right to trial. The judge will examine all reports pursuant to the Rules of Criminal Procedure and a hearing will be held to see all evidence submitted by either party to confirm the mental illness. Most probable she will get treatment for her mental disorder and once she has been stabilized and finished her treatment at a mental institution she will go to jail and finish her sentence there.
One legal standard used to determine whether or not a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” as per the M 'Naghten Rule is that because of their mental illness they either did not know what they were doing was wrong or knew it was wrong but could not control their actions (“enotes.com”)
The repercussions for a defendant who is found “not guilty by reason of insanity” is that he will not go to jail and thus be free to either hurt himself or hurt others again. On the other hand, does that are found “guilty but mentally ill” will be sent to a mental institution and get treatment for their mental illness and once they have completed their treatment they will be sent to jail to finish their term.
Dina for an unknown reason lost her baby on the seventh month of her pregnancy. Because her pregnancy was on term when she lost her baby, we can consider that she began to suffer from post partum depression. The depression could have worsen due to various factors such as using medications, maybe alcohol, lack of attention from her husband and



References: www.pregnancy-info.net www.pitt.edu The jury Expert volume 21, issue 6, nov 2009 [Sta

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is not covered as its own constitutional right, although it faults under the due process clause in the 5th and 14th amendments. The states define their own elements for what constitutes insanity, using the common law as a guideline. Mens rea—Latin for the “guilty mind” — is one of the necessary elements for insanity. If found incompetent, the person is usually charged to…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two cases with defendants who both have plead not guilty by reason of insanity, have been given two different rulings despite the fact that they both have mental illnesses. In James Holmes’ trial, Holmes killed twelve people and injured more than seventy in his local movie theater. Holmes was found not guilty by reason of insanity, but a psychiatrist claimed him to be legally sane, but had a mental illness.(Ingold and Phillips) If Holmes was ‘legally sane’ but mentally ill then he should not have been found not guilty by reason of INSANITY. In the Eddie Routh case, he was given a life sentence and had suffered severe PTSD and schizophrenia prior to the crime. (Banner) According to the Model Penal Code would not Routh's mental illness be the cause of his crime and excuse him from the sentence? The court is acting unjust, inconsistent, and illogical in their rulings to these defendants who both have records of mental illness, or claims of mental illness, but one walks into the prison at the end of the day and the other walks into the mental ward. The rules currently in action allow judges to rule based on what seems to be their unlogical personal opinion after maybe reviewing the mental illness records, maybe not, their pigheaded personality will…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Not guilty by reason of insanity means that the individual experienced a temporary moment of insanity that they could not control during which time they did something that would not normally have done. (Gibeaut, 2006, Vol. 92)…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You are considered insane if a mental disorder stops you from managing matters or obeying the law. John Hinckley’s verdict of Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity created a big commotion among the public. Many felt that the verdict was being used as a means for criminals to avoid their prison sentence, and to await their time in a prison facility (Simon, and Aaronson, 1988).…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2004, after reading the script of a Bryony Lavery’s Frozen, psychiatrist Dorothy Lewis was shock because every details in this play were similar to what she used to write in “Guilty by Reason of Insanity” in 1998. A chart of fifteen pages long was made up with the totaling of six hundred and seventy-five words are verbatim similarities. She thought that her life, her work was plagiarized by Lavery. Then she wanted to sue Frozen’s author. However, in “The New Yorker”, Gladwell disagreed with Lewis since Lavery just borrowed some interesting…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people have heard about the insanity defense in different famous cases where it has come up and been used. The insanity defense is a compromise between society and the law, meaning that society believes that criminals shouldn 't be punished if they are mentally incapable of controlling their conduct. There is a lot of controversy with the insanity defense, like questions such as what is the different if an insane person killed someone and if a sane person killed someone, the person is still dead. To which most have a point, it is still wrong but it all becomes an ethical game with killing someone who didn 't understand or comprehend what they did was wrong. The court defines it as there was only a crime committed if the person committed…

    • 3454 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    People assume that everyone who commits a crime and pleas insanity is using it as a way to get out of the crime they committed, especially murder. What most do not know is how hard it is to actually be convicted of Insanity. When someone is convicted of insanity, that also does not mean they are off the hook. Most if not all face a longer sentence then if they did not get convicted of insanity. What exactly does insanity mean? “Insanity is the legal term that refers to a mental disease or defect that impairs the reason and or will to control actions.” (Samaha,2015, pg209) There are two cases that I am going to talk about that both plead insanity but both had different results. The case of Andrea Yates and Eddie Ray Routh, two very big cases that happened years apart from each other in Texas…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Defense Essay

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Insanity defense is not there to get criminals off of the criminal charge, but is there to protect the mentally ill. The defense is there to help the people whose minds are not right. It is there so that if a mentally ill person commits a crime they will be able to get the right psychiatric help and for the psychiatric doctors to understand to further help people in the future. This is a topic that has many of great debates and will be debated further until all Americans actually know what the insanity defense…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the years it has been understood that there exists a great deal of difficulty when attempting to define an individual case of abnormal behavior. Many pros and con’s must be described and studied in order to accurately define, decipher, or explain a particular aspect of the many behavioral abnormalities. Abnormalities as a legal concept can be defined most simply as the definition of insanity given by the judicial system, which makes it a legal term as opposed to a psychological one. Insanities definition differs from one state, city, or jurisdiction to another. In some situations insanity is deemed as whether or not the person fully or correctly understands the complete separation of right from wrong. Other entities may see insanity as whether or not the defendant clearly understands if his or her behavior was actually criminal, or non criminal, or if they were able to or not able to control themselves and their behavior leading up to, or at the time of the act. In some states insanity is not even a viable defense at all.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays