Preview

Greek Idea Of Happiness

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
647 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Greek Idea Of Happiness
The Greeks had many ideas that contributed to the big concept of happiness. One of the many ideas that I learn from Greek philosophies is the idea of Agnostic, From a Greek meaning “unknown” or “unknowable”. This is commonly used to describe a person who does not patiently disbelieve in god but who asserts that nothing about god, including his existence, can be known for a certain. Another concept that compromises the idea of happiness is morality, in other words, depending on your beliefs distinguishing right from wrong. I will be comparing and contrasting how some of the ideas that I learned in my humanities class intertwine each other with the idea of happiness.
Does religion effect your idea of happiness? Agnosticism is sometimes related
…show more content…
Morality and happiness, I think that in on other word you can interpret this as being the good and the bad. But this is very different taking into considerations that we all are not raise the same way and with that comes different outlooks on the good or bad. For example if a significant child is raised in a household were people swear around him the child will notice that is okay ultimately creating a slippery slope of events that the child will base on his morals. On the other hand if a child is raised in a household were there’s indiscipline and rules the child will take in to consideration that there is consequences for bad behavior. All of these ideas come down to the main concept of a person’s morals, or in his choices that are influenced due to his morals. Happiness can interpreted in different ways according to Greek philosophies ethics or moral philosophy is the branch of philosophy that involves defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct. The term ethics derives from the Ancient Greek. And determining the right and wrong will compromise the idea of happiness in on other words you can’t be the judge and the prosecutor. From my experience morals are also influenced by people you hang around with. Likewise my friend and his family have customs that are different to mine. One of them taking off their shoes after entering their household. My friend told me that they do this as a way of keeping negative energy out. And also that since you walk with your shoes everywhere it’s just sanitary and better to not bring dirt inside the house. Getting back to the main topic of happiness, this is how morality plays a part in achieving

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What Happiness Is

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the short essay of “What Happiness Is” by Eduardo Porter, he gives explicit details pertaining to the complex word, happiness. In its own term, happiness is defined as, the state of being happy. According to Porter’s findings on happiness, he says that psychologists and economists believe this: “Most psychologists and economists who study happiness agree that what they prefer to call “subjective well-beings” comprises three parts: satisfaction meant to capture how people judge their lives measured up against their aspirations; positive feelings like joy; and the absence of negative feelings like anger” (457). Porter suggests that this does exist and that because it does it helps individuals through certain times, like: hardships, economy, family, country, sickness, and even death. He is saying that because happiness exists, individuals are able to overcome obstacles in their life, and are able to live longer and healthier. Porter does focus on the main issues and key abstract views of the word happiness. He covers important issues, by giving detail; he talks about the views of psychologists and economists’ views. “ In 1980s a new discipline called Prospect Theory—also known as behavioral economics—deployed the tools of psychology to analyze economic behavior” (458).…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pr in Selfish Pursuit

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I completely agree with Brandt on this issue. We have taken a very narrow and uncompromising stance on the issue of happiness. I argue that happiness is an extremely widespread concept. No two people can define happiness in the same way. Defining happiness through materialistic wealth and success may certainly be suitable for some people and reading “Herodotus” and “Plutarch” may be the definition of happiness for others. Still others may define happiness as spending…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s writings on happiness are seen as a representation of Socrate’s view since Plato was his student, and presents his writings on happiness in three dialogues, namely Euthydemus, The Symposium and The Republic. As to necessary conditions for happiness in the Euthydemus, he argues first that happiness is what everybody desires; it is the end or goal of all our activities, unconditional good; secondly, he says that happiness does not depend on external things but rather how those things are used. For instance, one cannot claim that money brings happiness, but rather how money is used is what determines happiness. An ignorant person will waste away the money and end up worse than before, but a wise person will use the money well for his own good, and the same applies to external things, such as looks or even…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is happiness? That is not a question that may be easily answered. Due to the fact that every human-being possesses their own views on life, it is possible that there are innumerable interpretations of what is ultimately this idea seen as happiness. For the purpose of interpreting the idea of happiness as opposed to “being happy” I believe that it is necessary that there be a more continual and perpetual meaning is attached to happiness. I do not believe that actual happiness is a fleeting experience, but instead, a lasting state in which someone finds themselves. When looking to a dictionary or other source of reference to determine an official and concrete meaning behind happiness, the Miriam-Webster…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Happiness is all around the world, it is a very genuine and important thing, and everyone wants to be happy. Being happy is what makes life worth living, and it makes life a lot better in every way possible. What makes people happy though? Are bodily and external goods necessary to happiness? I would say no because by which they can make you happy, they are not necessary for human happiness. It’s not what things you buy, the pain, the suffering, or enjoyment your body might get. Human happiness comes from somewhere else within the human. Comparing and contrasting Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ view of human happiness will help give a better clear and logical understanding on what really happiness is and why I believe that bodily and external goods are not necessary for happiness.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Choosing what morality is determined by, may be the problem in its own-self. Great men have contemplated where morality really lies, though many of them have took another's work to serve as the guide to strive for their own progression. Through the progression of these studies one can conclude that happiness is a focal point in the works of many great men. It seems to be one of the basis of which humanity uses as their definition of morality.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people try to define and consider different definitions of what happiness is, and I think that Plato and Aristotle offer interesting views of happiness and what it means for one to live a good life. Both philosophers agree that happiness is an important factor in one’s life and essentially the essence of how to live a good life. Plato offers many theories and definitions of justice leading to happiness, while Aristotle argues that happiness is the main goal that all humans aim for in their entire life. Plato offers a philosophical view of a happy life for an individual by explaining a just state and what it would entail and also the theory of the forms that one must understand to achieve happiness. After learning about both philosophers, I have come to the conclusion that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness more because he gives us a broad outline of what a good life is. Although Plato was Aristotle’s mentor, Aristotle offers a view of happiness that is more plausible and relevant than Plato’s because it places a large emphasis on the idea of the function of a human being. Therefore, in this paper, I will argue that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness over Plato’s because of the way Aristotle describes how humans can achieve the greatest good in life: happiness.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the discussion on defining happiness thickens in the Republic, Socrates starts comparing the makings of a good city to a good soul as a way to successfully segue into explaining what the true meaning of happiness is. He explains that a well-functioning city is equivalent to happiness. If a city is stable and flourishing, then the city as a whole would be happy and the citizens would also be happy, especially if they are free from any internal or external conflicts. Though some can argue that there is no correlation between the well-being of a city and its citizens, one cannot simply ignore that a poorly functioning city directly influences the state of living of its citizens negatively; how can the citizens be happy if their city isn’t functioning…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People have defined happiness as some kind of good of a human being. In Nicomachean Ethics: Book I, Aristotle defines happiness as the activity of living well, which in the Greek word is called eudaimonia. He tends to think that happiness is how we balance and moderate our lives to seek the highest pleasures, which he calls maintaining the mean. In the following excerpt from Book I, Aristotle talks about how happiness presumably consists in attaining some good or set of goods. “Now goods have been divided into three classes, and some are described as external, others as relating to soul or to body; we call those that relate to soul most properly and truly goods, and psychical actions and activities we class as relating to soul” (Book I pg. 7). He is saying that since happiness consists in attaining some good that there are three different types of goods that you can attain; an external goods, which consists of wealth or honor, goods of the body, which is health or physical strength, and lastly goods of the soul, which consists of knowledge, education, and friendship. Aristotle goes on to say how only certain goods are necessary for happiness. “It is correct also in that we identify the end with certain actions and activities; for thus it falls among goods of the soul and not among external goods. Another belief which harmonizes with our account is that the happy man lives well and does well; for we have practically defined happiness as a sort of good life and good action” (Book I pg. 7). He is saying that only certain goods such as health are the necessary preconditions for happiness and that other goods such as wealth is just something extra that help fill out a good life for a virtuous person, but the possession of virtue or excellence is the element of happiness. Aristotle also adds that humans seek different goods that make them happy compared to animals because humans have a rational capacity that when exercised perfects our natures as human beings.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explore Aristotle's account of happiness. Do you agree with him, that moral activity is secondary?…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition Of Happiness

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First happiness helps helping. People who are happy tend to want to help other people than a person who is not. They are more likely to have spent some of their time or money helping others (Post). A way to increase happiness is by volunteering. People who donate to charity or spent money on gifts for others were found to be happier than those who did not spend money on others, and this was regardless of income level (Anik). While it has been assumed that giving also leads to greater happiness, this has only recently been started to be scientifically proven. For example according to actionforkindess.org, “when participants in a study did five new acts of kindness one day per week over a six-week period, even if each act was small, they experienced an increase in well-being compared to control groups.” Also “In another study, participant who were given five dollars or twenty dollars to spend on others or donate to charity experienced greater happiness than people given the same amount to spend on themselves” (Let’s put the things). The amount of money that the people were given did have anything to do with how much happiness they had. When someone is happy it makes them want to give more to others than when they are sad. This can lead to a higher tendency to give and so on (Vallant). This not only affects Americans but it is consistent across many different cultures as well. It makes sense…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you define happiness? Would you say happiness is always a good thing? Or would you say the complete opposite and say it’s a bad thing. At that moment you might even ask yourself, could it even be bad? Whether or not you believe happiness is good or bad you know one thing for certain, and that is, happiness is defined by what you define it to be regardless of anyone else. But between Plato’s Republic, and More’s Utopia happiness is defined by one main idea in each of these perfect society's. Although both Plato's Republic and More's Utopia have this depiction of a perfect society, they both define happiness in different ways. Plato's Republic defines happiness to be a place where the only way to…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle states that if all of our actions were a means to something else, then there would be nothing we would try to ultimately achieve, and life would be pointless. A highest good would solve this, but it must be a means to itself, self-sufficient and within reach. "Happiness, then, is apparently something complete and self-sufficient, since it is the end of things achievable in action." Happiness alone satisfies these, and thus is our highest good. Aristotle describes all beings as having a purpose or function in life, which separates us from other beings and must thus be unique. Living, for example is shared with plants, and can thus not be the function of a human being. Aristotle claims that this function is reason, or logos. "We have found, then, that the human function is activity of the soul in accord with reason or requiring reason." Aristotle goes on to say that if our function is completed well, it will lead us to our highest good (happiness). Consequently, our highest good (happiness) must be performing…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle rejects other dominant views of what happiness is. He says happiness is not a life of pleasure, power, material wealth (being rich) or honour. He believes these things are not valued for their own sake. They are all means to attaining something else. I believe the rejection of these other views of what happiness are correct also, for example, Honour is also dependent on other people bestowing it on you whereas happiness should be something you can get your self.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While it could be said this definition of happiness does not fit with the majority of individuals ideals of happiness it is actually quite interesting. Most elderly people who are terminally ill or just dying of old age will often say “I am happy; I have lived a good life.” Therefore it could be said that ‘Aristotelianism’ is an accurate definition of happiness certainly for that…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays