Preview

Aristotle's Views On Happiness

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
475 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle's Views On Happiness
Aristotle states that if all of our actions were a means to something else, then there would be nothing we would try to ultimately achieve, and life would be pointless. A highest good would solve this, but it must be a means to itself, self-sufficient and within reach. "Happiness, then, is apparently something complete and self-sufficient, since it is the end of things achievable in action." Happiness alone satisfies these, and thus is our highest good. Aristotle describes all beings as having a purpose or function in life, which separates us from other beings and must thus be unique. Living, for example is shared with plants, and can thus not be the function of a human being. Aristotle claims that this function is reason, or logos. "We have found, then, that the human function is activity of the soul in accord with reason or requiring reason." Aristotle goes on to say that if our function is completed well, it will lead us to our highest good (happiness). Consequently, our highest good (happiness) must be performing …show more content…
"For it is peculiar to human beings, in comparison to the other animals, that they alone have perception of what is good or bad, just or unjust, and the rest." Aristotle also states that a city-state exists by nature because it attains self-sufficiency, and exists for the sake of living well. Aristotle goes on to say that individuals cannot perform their functions apart from the city-state because on their own, they are not self-sufficient. "Anyone who cannot form a community with others, or who does not need to because he is self-sufficient, is no part of a city-state – he is either a beast or a god." Aristotle believes that the lawmaker does what is better for a person, and does not hold freedom as a highest
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Pros And Cons Of A Single Ruler
    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle's Pros And Cons Of A Single Ruler

    government they want to live happily. As Aristotle said, every human has the capacity to distinguish between what is good or bad for the city and it is something that came since a person was born with their natural instinct. They just need the practice and that is the public education that in the city is implemented with virtues. Aristotle is also concerned that human beings are not perfect, or excellent, or always be good, a person can be bad also and it is the natural sense of life. “It follows that there cannot be a single excellence common to all the citizens” (Aristotle 92). Aristotle studies the human behavior in order to create this functional constitution with the needs of the people and the weakness of the human to heal every aspect…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Aristotle's Beliefs On How To Live A Good Life
    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Aristotle's Beliefs On How To Live A Good Life

    Though Aristotle does not explicitly speak of meaning, he surely considered the reality of impartial values and meaning. While his primary concern was on the happiness gained by accounting for these values, he does not say that the happy life means the meaningful. However, we can infer that he thought that the good life and the meaningful life are equals. Therefore, Aristotle’s plan in order to live a good life is understandable, and is a guide to a meaningful life.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Theory Comparison Chart Paper
    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethical Theory Comparison Chart Paper

    Aristotle believed that we as humans have natural obligations that provide happiness. Happiness consists of pleasure and the capacity to develop reasoning.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Authorization Of Slavery
    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle's Authorization Of Slavery

    Aristotle a Greek philosopher born in Macedonia in 394 BC has different forms of viewing politics. He describes the polis, or city, as a koinonia, or political association, and he proclaims that all relations, like all thoughtful human acts, are shaped with the objective of accomplishing a particular good. He says that being part of a polis is the only way someone can be a part of a great life. Because politics are necessary for this Aristotle says, "Man is by nature a political animal."(Aristotle 90). As part of the books discussion of the economy a city-state needs, Aristotle defends the system of private property and argues against extreme capitalism and says that slavery is necessary in order for society to function and democracy as being…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle vs. Mill: Distinct Ideas of What Happiness Is
    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle vs. Mill: Distinct Ideas of What Happiness Is

    Aristotle states that everything that a man does is for an end purpose. He defines happiness as actions in accordance with reason. If humans live out their lives to their full potential and live according to reason and with virtues, than they can obtain happiness. In today’s world, many think that happiness is got from money, success, and fame. Many people believe that these things are essential for happiness. Aristotle suggests, it is what we do in our life, not what we gain from our life, like money or success, which gives us happiness. He argues that happiness does not occur instantly. In our world today, we want to feel happiness instantly. However, Aristotle does not rely on this idea. He believes that happiness comes over time and the things that happen in short lived moments do not truly make us happy, but that the activities or virtues, we engage in over time give us happiness in the end. He contends that by achieving certain virtues, it leads to happiness in the long run, not in an instantaneous moment. In our society today, Aristotle’s ideas on happiness would not be useful. In Aristotle’s perfect world, everyone would be virtuous and happy. Unfortunately, that is not how our society works today. Aristotle’s ideas are inaccurate because many people gain happiness out of doing unvirtuous actions. For example, Hitler gained some sort of happiness out of murdering Jews.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes
    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    One of Aristotle’s most prominent teachings in “Politics,” is the interpretation of the state of nature. “It is evident that the state is a creation of nature, and that man is by nature a political animal.” (I. 2. 153a.) From this statement, it is clear that human beings are innately political, regardless of the setting they are in. One example he gives to support his argument is that the hand of a body is similar to an individual of a city. This analogy demonstrates the relation of one functioning part that is attached to the whole and complete functioning system. A functional hand is only used when the entire body is operating correctly. Similarly, the city is comprised of multiple individuals each with specific duties to create a collection of different parts with different functions, all working simultaneously together for the city. The goal is to pursue the common good of the city, even when it conflicts with one’s self-interest. The common good gives people the opportunity to reach the highest form of virtue and requires the whole community. Another example…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis
    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Social Responsibility
    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Social Responsibility

    In Aristotle’s theory of morality, Nicomachean Ethics, he surmises that all human activities aim at some end or good. There are three types of good, sensual (pleasure), political (noble virtues for citizens), of life of thought (contemplation) (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 51). He states “every scientific inquiry, and similarly every action and purpose may be said to aim at some good”. What he is saying is that everything has an end point which is something good. Everything we want to accomplish is for some good. The ends are many, and he goes on to say the end of the medical art I health, the end of the shipbuilding is a vessel, the end of strategy is victory, and the end of economics is wealth. One piece, to point out is Aristotle states there is a final end. For example some may think of money as an end, however, without something to purchase, money is meaningless. Working for example is an action not a goal, work is not the good, so what is the supreme end, what are you working to attain? “Perhaps happiness is the supreme good” (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 52).…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Happiness Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ View
    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Happiness Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ View

    Happiness is all around the world, it is a very genuine and important thing, and everyone wants to be happy. Being happy is what makes life worth living, and it makes life a lot better in every way possible. What makes people happy though? Are bodily and external goods necessary to happiness? I would say no because by which they can make you happy, they are not necessary for human happiness. It’s not what things you buy, the pain, the suffering, or enjoyment your body might get. Human happiness comes from somewhere else within the human. Comparing and contrasting Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ view of human happiness will help give a better clear and logical understanding on what really happiness is and why I believe that bodily and external goods are not necessary for happiness.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle: Function Argument
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle: Function Argument

    In Aristotle’s Nicomacheon Ethics Book he uses his function argument as grounds for his claim that the human function is the activity of the soul in accordance with excellence or virtue. I lay out the arguments that make up Aristotle’s conclusion in order to pinpoint exactly which of Aristotle’s statement I believe is false. (1) Aristotle first asserts that happiness is an ultimate good that is both complete and self-sufficient. (2) The ultimate good for a thing is its ability to complete its function. (3) Human being’s must have a function beyond an occupation in society such as a potter or painter because the ultimate human good must be all encompassing. So the function of a human being cannot specifically be being good at any one position or task. (4) The human function cannot involve just growth because that is essentially the function of plants, and a humans function must be unique in itself. (5) Aristotle claims that because animals and plants cannot reason, a human being’s function must have something to do with rationality, the part that involves our soul. (6) Lesser goods like wealth all are meant to lead to happiness, this rises from the first premise that the ultimate good must be self-sufficient. (C) Therefore he concluded that the human function is the completion of a task (the activity) that involves the soul (not the body), and leads to doing what is ultimately the most virtuous or excellent thing to do. The human function is the activity of the soul in accordance with excellence or virtue.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy 120w
    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philosophy 120w

    Human function is necessary for our well-being. Defined as an activity of the soul based on thinking and reasoning human function is also known as being the best good when it comes to happiness, because it is complete (7). Aristotle compared how our happiness is so essential to our lives the same way it is necessary for a plant to live a purely nutritive life and an animal needs to live a life based on sense perception and desire (intro.) Every one of us has a function, but it is different from person to person because it is solely based on reasoning. The following example comes from page 9 in the text: “The function of a harpist is the same as the function of an excellent harpist.” Both harpists want to play the harp, well, but how they accomplish this goal comes from their personal thinking and reasoning. We live based on all decisions personally made coming from this practical reasoning, when these decisions are completed, happiness will come to us. Reading on,…

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle and Happiness
    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle and Happiness

    1. According to the text a full functioning completely happy person will be mentally, physically, spiritually, financially, professionally, creatively, and socially healthy & well rounded individual. Happiness involves being really alive and not just existing. Aristotle believes that a person should work hard doing what they love, they also shouldn’t devote their lives to acquiring riches since riches don’t provide happiness. One should also reject fame and public success to become happy as self sufficiency is believed to provide happiness. Happiness is a process starting from infancy. A happy life is a life where spiritual, physical and social needs are met under reason and moderation. I think Aristotle recipe of happiness involves a person making a conscience decision to do the right thing in all aspects of their life. I think the happiness he refers to is obtained by living a healthy life, being in tune with our psyche, having a career that we enjoy, having friends and family to love, and having enough riches to support ourselves without gloating about them.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Odyssey: The Human Ideal
    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Odyssey: The Human Ideal

    The basic idea behind Aristotle’s book is that the ultimate goal in life is to achieve true happiness. This particular idea makes the most sense to me. “Happiness, then, is found to be something perfect and self-sufficient, being the end to which our actions are directed” (Aristotle, Page 15). This quote states that happiness is the final, the end and all other things will lead up to this. Happiness is stated to direct our actions because people all want to be happy. This idea gives people the feeling of “self-sufficient” because no other person can make another person achieve the ultimate good because it is all dependent on the person. Happiness is a perfect thing because no one truly knows what it is until they reach it themselves. The idea of happiness is subjective around the world given the different cultures so it is impossible to even begin to describe specifically how to reach the ultimate good. He also says "Since happiness is a certain sort of activity of the soul in accord with complete virtue, we must examine virtue; for that will perhaps also be a way to study happiness better" (Aristotle, 16). Happiness is a virtue and in order to know happiness then you need to have an idea of what a virtue is. Virtue is the behavior showing high moral standards. Moral standards are important in all culture and especially in the Geek culture because of the gods who…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Virtue Ethics and Ethics of Care
    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Virtue Ethics and Ethics of Care

    Aristotle claims “every action and pursuit is thought to aim at some good; and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that which all things aim” (Aristotle 8). Virtue ethics claims that humans strive for good within their activities. The highest goods are considered ends in themselves because they are ultimate, complete, self-sufficient, and attainable by activity. The chief or ultimate good according to Aristotle is happiness because it embodies all of the qualities of the highest good and it is an end in itself. Everything else considered good only can lead to happiness, whereas happiness does not lead to anything greater. Humans have a greater sense of happiness and pleasure than animals because of the way the human soul is divided. The…

    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics