Global Business Practise
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES Vol. XLII No. 2 June 2008
Globalization and the Nation-State: Dead or Alive
Richard L. Brinkman and June E. Brinkman
Abstract: Has the current process of globalization led to a decline in nationstate sovereignty? To address this question there is a need to clarify the concepts of the nation-state and nationalism. A decline in U.S. nation-state sovereignty would serve to promote megacorporate power manifest in the rise of the corporate state over that of the nation- state. Evidence of U.S. nationstate decline appears in many areas, such as that of Article XVI in the WTO and policies of the IMF. The decline in nation-state sovereignty is also evident in U.S. policies of privatization manifest in the War Service Industry (WSI). Keywords: nation-state, nationalism, and War Service Industry (WSI) JEL Classification Codes: A12, B52, and F01
There is a good deal of discussion in the globalization literature related to the question: “Is the Nation-State Finished?” (Holton 1998, 80-107; Ohmai 1995). Even as early as 1969 Charles Kindleberger stated that “[t]he nation state is just about through as an economic unit” (Kindleberger 1969, 207). Is this position correct, and further, what would a conceivable loss of nation-state sovereignty portend for the long-term dynamics of ongoing culture evolution? The Cultural Complexities of Conception: The Nation, Nationality, the Nation-State and Nationalism Figure 1, “The Evolution of Culture,” depicts the sequential pattern of the stages of culture evolution. Culture evolves with the evolution of knowledge which in its application appears as technology. Technological advance, as a process of economic development relates to the core of culture and accounts for the dynamics of culture evolution. Figure 2, “The Evolution of Governance and Sovereignty,” relates to a
Richard L. Brinkman is a Professor Emeritus of Economics and International Studies and June E. Brinkman is Retired Adjunct Faculty at
Globalization and the Nation-State: Dead or Alive
Richard L. Brinkman and June E. Brinkman
Abstract: Has the current process of globalization led to a decline in nationstate sovereignty? To address this question there is a need to clarify the concepts of the nation-state and nationalism. A decline in U.S. nation-state sovereignty would serve to promote megacorporate power manifest in the rise of the corporate state over that of the nation- state. Evidence of U.S. nationstate decline appears in many areas, such as that of Article XVI in the WTO and policies of the IMF. The decline in nation-state sovereignty is also evident in U.S. policies of privatization manifest in the War Service Industry (WSI). Keywords: nation-state, nationalism, and War Service Industry (WSI) JEL Classification Codes: A12, B52, and F01
There is a good deal of discussion in the globalization literature related to the question: “Is the Nation-State Finished?” (Holton 1998, 80-107; Ohmai 1995). Even as early as 1969 Charles Kindleberger stated that “[t]he nation state is just about through as an economic unit” (Kindleberger 1969, 207). Is this position correct, and further, what would a conceivable loss of nation-state sovereignty portend for the long-term dynamics of ongoing culture evolution? The Cultural Complexities of Conception: The Nation, Nationality, the Nation-State and Nationalism Figure 1, “The Evolution of Culture,” depicts the sequential pattern of the stages of culture evolution. Culture evolves with the evolution of knowledge which in its application appears as technology. Technological advance, as a process of economic development relates to the core of culture and accounts for the dynamics of culture evolution. Figure 2, “The Evolution of Governance and Sovereignty,” relates to a
Richard L. Brinkman is a Professor Emeritus of Economics and International Studies and June E. Brinkman is Retired Adjunct Faculty at
References: Atkinson, Glen. “An Evolutionary Theory of the Development of Property and the State.” In Founding of Institutional Economics: The Leisure Class and Sovereignty, edited by W.J. Samuels, pp. 31-46. New York: Routledge, 1998. Brinkman, Richard L. “Market Militarism.” In The Military-Industrial Complex, edited by C.B. Walker, D.A. Bella, and S J. Sprecher, pp. 181-215. New York: Peter Lang, 1992. ———. “Toward a Culture-Conception of Technology” Journal of Economic Issues 31, 4 (1997): 1027-1038. Burtless, Gary, Robert Z. Lawrence, Robert E. Litan and Robert J. Shapiro. Globaphobia. Washington, DC: Brookings, 1998. Globalization and the Nation-State: Dead or Alive 433 Carr, Edward H. Nationalism and After. New York: Macmillan, 1945. Commons, John R. A Sociological View of Sovereignty. New York: A.M. Kelley, 1967. Davies, Richard O. Defenders of the Old Guard. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1993. Hayes, Carleton J.H. The Historical Evolution of Modern Nationalism. New York: Macmillan, 1950. Heaton, Herbert. Economic History of Europe. New York: Harper & Row, 1948. Hobsbawm, E. J. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Holman, Frank E. Story of the Bricker Amendment. New York: Committee for Constitutional Government, 1954. Holton, Robert J. Globalization and the Nation State. New York: St. Martin’s, 1998. Kindleberger, Charles P. American Business Abroad. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969. ———. “Assets and Liabilities of International Economics: The Postwar Bankruptcy of Theory and Policy” pp. 47-64. Experiences and Problems of International Monetary Systems. MONTE DEI PASCHI DI SIENA, 1982. Kohn, Hans. The Idea of Nationalism. New York: Macmillan, 1944. ———. Nationalism: Its Meaning and History. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1955. Kuznets, Simon. Modern Economic Growth. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966. Mann, Thomas A. and Norman Ornstein. The Broken Branch. New York: Oxford Univesity Press, 2006. Melman, Seymour. The Permanent War Economy. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1974. ———. Profits Without Production. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1987. Morley, Felix M. Treaty Law and the Constitution: A Study of the Bricker Amendment. New York: American Enterprise Association, 1953. Myrdal, Gunnar. Rich Lands and Poor. New York: Harper, 1957. ———. An American Dilemma. Vol. I. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964. Ohmae, Kenichi. The End of the Nation State. New York: The Free Press, 1995. Rasor, Dina and Robert Bauman. Betraying Our Troops: The Destructive Results of Privatizing War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Scahill, Jeremy. Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. New York: Nation Books, 2007. Singer, P. J. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003. Stiglitz, Joseph E. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton, 2002. Veblen, Thorstein B. Absentee Ownership. New Brunswick: Transaction Press, 1997. Wallach, Lori and Patrick Woodall. Whose Trade Organization? New York: The New Press, 2004.