Preview

Gilgamesh and Roland's Heroism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1219 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gilgamesh and Roland's Heroism
Gilgamesh and Roland 's Heroism

Mesopotamia was about 300 miles long and 150 miles wide. It was located between two rivers, the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers. The word Mesopotamia itself means "The land between two rivers". With this, Mesopotamia depended on the cultivation of the land for survival. As Mesopotamia began to develop there were city-states that were established. These city-states were surrounded by a mud brick wall and farmland. Sumerians would take great pride in their city-state, and that created chaos. At times wars would break out to prove which city-state was the strongest. Each city-state had a priest-king to rule over their people. However, their beliefs were polytheistic and centered their beliefs in four Gods that represented power. These Gods provided for mankind and every year the Sumerians believed that the Gods would decide their faith. During the time between 2700 ca. and 2600ca. there was a ruler who ran the city-state of Uruk, Gilgamesh the famously known king who was two-thirds God and one third-man. On the other hand, during the time of Roland their civilization was ran by one king known as Charlemagne, who believed in monotheism and that Christianity was the one true religion. During this reign Charlemagne was anointed as the head of the Roman Empire. Their goal as a society was based on conquering cities to convert them to Christianity. Both our epic heroes are from different eras in time that may have contributed to their actions; however, as contradictory as their civilizations were they share distinctions and parallels in their character. Gilgamesh was a king the believed in many deities and was disliked by his people. He was portrayed as a very beautiful man physically and very wise. Nonetheless, Gilgamesh established his city-state as a tyrannical ruler. Gilgamesh felt power and control and took possession of anything and anyone, "Gilgamesh leaves not the son to his father; Day and night is unbridled his



Cited: Anonymous. "The Epic of Gilgamesh." Anonymous. "The Song of Roland". Translated by Dorothy Sayers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first Mesopotamians were the Sumerians who had city-states. Sumerian cities were surrounded by a wall and used large supply of mud to their advantage. Many large buildings and structures were made of mud bricks. Sumerian cities had a theocratic government in which many priestly figures had great power. A temple was built to serve the priests and priestesses but soon kings came into play. Kings were the sole rulers of governments. Kings had full authority of armies and people. Farming was big in Mesopotamia and there were many different products of trade. Inventions like the wheel were made to make carrying good easier. Sumerian city-states had different social groups. Nobles were the highest in status then the commoners and then the slaves. Many city-states wanted to take control of others and started war with them. The most famous and successful leaders of these wars was Hammurabi. Hammurabi gained control of many city-states. Hammurabi was a fair leader who gave peace to his empire. After his death however, his empire collapsed due to weak kings and strong invaders.…

    • 2240 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout the Epic, Gilgamesh was perceived in countless ways: an authoritarian who was power hungry, a bloke who transitioned into a mighty slayer of evil, a depleted broken man, and finally someone who had overcome countless obstacles, satisfied with his life. Gilgamesh first became introduced into the Epic as a dominant king who was two-thirds divine, one-third human; his father, a previous king and his mother a goddess. King Gilgamesh felt as if he was superior to the common folk. Believing that everything was supposed to be bestowed upon him, it caused an uproar in his life. Gilgamesh's first form was the primary condition that was to be seen in this work. He was a tyrant king who cared only for himself, and the citizens of Uruk felt…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia PERSIAN CHART

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mesopotamia was made up of city-states. It was one nation as a whole, but each city-state had it’s own government and own set of laws. City-states could also conquer one another for power and more territory.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Along with their outlooks being different, so were the structures of their government and cities. The Mesopotamian civilization was organized in a dozen or more different city states, while the Egyptian civilization maintained unity. This being, cities in Egypt were far less important than in Mesopotamia. Each city-state in Mesopotamia was ruled by a different king, that claimed to be that city's patron deity. The Egyptians were ruled by a pharaoh, believed to be a god in human form. This shows that were ruled in very different ways, by very different people. It also shows how different the structure of their cities were.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gilgamesh is the king of Uruk, city of Mesapotamia, and semi-mortal: part human and part god. His arrogance overcame the inability to respect the people of Uruk. He did whatever he wanted to and oppressed them and suffered on his tyranny. Gilgamesh not only violated but also at times, followed the important values of the people of this time. For instance, on page 17, Shamat is talking to Enkidu and explains how Gilgamesh “Is destined for both joy and grief.” His city is a reflection of him; they too have joy and grief because of him. The other Gods, Sun, Earth, Water and Wisdom love Gilgamesh, and Shamat explain to Enkidu how Gilgamesh is destined to be a powerful king. He takes advantage of the people and the people plead to the gods for a new leader sending Enkidu. Although, Gilgamesh is cruel to the people, he actually cares for Enkidu and mourns for his death. He is faithful to Enkidu and loves…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The root of the differences between the Mesopotamian cultures lies within the politics. The two cultures operated very differently as Mesopotamia was ruled regionally while Egypt used a more centralized government. Kings in the Mesopotamian region formed city states ruled by leaders of their armies while they just oversaw what was going on via these mediums. On the other hand, Egyptian culture featured “god-kings” or pharaohs that controlled much larger expanses of land than Mesopotamian leaders did. Logically, it makes sense that this would occur because of the differences in influence for these two regions. For example, unification of Egypt was inspired by Sudan’s use of small kingdoms that governed the agriculture of the rulers. The Egyptians then faced competition which caused their small kingdoms to conquer neighboring kingdoms to the point where they controlled much larger territories. The notion of kings and pharaohs leads into another difference. Mesopotamian societies featured monarchies as they were led by kings while Egyptians had a theocracy as pharaohs were divine rulers. In Mesopotamia it is figured that their monarchs evolved from men making decisions on behalf of their whole…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gilgamesh was a very attractive masculine hero who was two thirds god and one third man. He was the powerful king of Uruk who went on a long, hard, and physical journey to achieve his number one goal, which was immortality. Through his journey Gilgamesh faced many obstacles and challenges that made it even more difficult in accomplishing his goal. There were many unimportant and important steps throughout his journey that showed the development of Gilgamesh’s true identity, and how he matured along the way.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upon finishing the book The Epic of Gilgamesh, i believe most people would have some strong feelings about the former king of Uruk. Although the majority of those feelings may include regurgitation, anger, and despise; I on the other hand would like to argue why Gilgamesh was a good guy. Of course Gilgamesh had his flaws, but if you could look past the senseless raping of his own women and the constant fear he placed in the hearts of his own people on a daily basis, Gilgamesh is a relatively stand-up Demigod. It appears to me that Gilgamesh took on the responsibility of being king before he was mature enough to do so. I am a firm believer that everything happens for a reason, and if it weren't for Enkidu meeting Gilgamesh, maybe Gilgamesh never would have matured enough to gain the gratitude and praise of his people. Becoming immortal was ultimately what…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gilgamesh Hero's Journey

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Gilgamesh, we see several of Campbell’s stages of the heroic myth. We see Gilgamesh introduced in his ordinary world, he is called to adventure twice, he passes the first threshold, he meets several helpers and encounters tests, he reaches the innermost cave, endures the supreme ordeal, seizes the treasure, is resurrected, and returns home with the treasure.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A big difference was they way each civilization was ruled. In Egypt their was a pharaoh and his family which were on the top of the social pyramid, and ruled. When a pharaoh died one of his sons would take place and be in charge, this is very similar to the government of England, but the only people with power were the pharaoh and family, and certain high nobles. in Mesopotamia their was no one person in charge. They had self governing towns and cities that their own rules and regulations. Not all cities and towns were the same in one city their might be one person in charge and in another city their might be a democracy were they each decide what should be done. Another difference is the way the deceased were buried. In ancient Egypt when people died they would be preserved and buried in a tomb with some of their favorite thing. Depending on your social class people would be buried in different places. The pharaoh and their family would be buried in the great Egyptian pyramids with gold, diamonds, ruby, and other valuables. In Mesopotamia the people would be buried with nothing unless they were high class people. Also, the people would not be preserved they would just be buried, but their would be a ritual held in their honor unless they were a slave. An other important difference is how the people would view gods. in Egypt people viewed gods with hope and positive energy, and the people thought that the gods were responsible for their well being. In Mesopotamia the people did not have a great connections with god and the people would not blame good fortunes on god only the bad fortunes. Whenever something bad happened they would believe that it was the gods that did…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt was a monarchy and Mesopotamia was a democracy. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was in charge of making laws and owned everything, meanwhile, in Mesopotamia, there were many kings in different city-states and they did not own people’s belongings. A difference is that the land was measured differently. In Mesopotamia, they divided the land into city-states. Also, both civilizations thought differently about their kings. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was considered a god. Meanwhile, Mesopotamia believed that the kings weren’t gods so they didn’t worship them as gods. At one point, when the Assyrians were expanding a lot, the city-state got cut up into provinces. The ancient egyptians wrote hieroglyphics about the profits, costs and laws civilians made. In Mesopotamia, the scribes would draw pictograms on clay boards. While Egyptians trusted their justice goddess to teach right from wrong among their citizens, Mesopotamians would follow Hammurabi's law that demanded and Eye for an Eye. With this law, the offended person would be free to do the same thing he suffered at the hands of the criminal. In Mesopotamia would have a voice and a vote for city matters as going to war or not meanwhile Egypt didn’t have a voice. Everything was decided by the Pharaoh. So after all, there are differences and similarities between these dissimilar civilizations that…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gilgamesh Research Paper

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gilgamesh has unusual circumstances of his birth by being a god and a human along, with Gilgamesh born to become a king. According to Gilgamesh it states, “Gilgamesh was two- thirds God and one-third man” (28). Gilgamesh was unusual when he was born since, he was both God and human. Because of his unusual birth it meant that he's a still human and will eventually face death. But, Gilgamesh knowing that he can die any moment doesn't stop him from going on the adventures and fulfilling his quests. As a result Gilgamesh's birth is an aspect of him becoming a hero. The text states, “Gilgamesh was the renowned king of the city of Uruk. To his people, Gilgamesh was a tyrant who became a great hero” (28). In other words Gilgamesh was known to…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The character Gilgamesh is an epic hero because of his actions in the story. His bravery and the challenges he went through to find the monster Humbaba. It was a six week journey through forests and mountains with challenges on surviving those obstacles.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These river valleys were both polytheistic, or believed in many gods. The difference lies in what they believed to be the gods. Ancient Egyptians believed that the pharaoh was a god that was sent down to rule over all of them. They also believed in the gods and goddesses were in control of the forces and elements of nature. Mesopotamia on the other hand, believed in Anu or An - the god of heaven and the sky, lord of constellations, and father of the gods. They also believed in Adad or Ishkur - god of storms, and Ashur Enlil - god of wind. (Ancient.eu)…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    written in cuneiform on 12 clay tablets about 2000 BC. This heroic poem is named…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays