Preview

Gibbons V. Ogden

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
341 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gibbons V. Ogden
After a four year hiatus in the Supreme Court docket, the court finally rule in 1824, the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, which eventually proclaimed the federally supremacy clause and the commerce clause, but it's impact of American commerce can still be felt today. The loose interpretation of the Constitution by Chief Justice Marshall had greatly infuriated and scared the Southerners because if the government could regulate interstate commerce, then it could one day regulate slavery; it's technically commerce. Therefore, states such as South Carolina passed the Negro Seamen Act, which was later struck down unconstitutional, greatly hit the issue of slavery. South Carolinians had great bases for their beliefs because of the recent Denmark Vesey uprising. Often this case is coined as the "Emancipation Proclamation of American Commerce," it should be gladly called that because of the reflection on the elasticity of the great paper known as the Constitution. The case solidified the Congress held all powers to regulate any modes of Commerce. Gibbons v. Ogden would prevail with the inventions of trains and airplanes as modes of commercial activities. Congress, with this case, was later to pass measure that would outlaw unfair price fixing on transportation of foods and pass epochal measures such as the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Federal supremacy was also finally solidified by this case. New York said that the Federal Coasting license that Thomas Gibbons had was useless in New York waters. Thus this sets-up the great issue of the day state gov't v. federal gov't. But as New York and the rest of the United States finally gets into it's head that the Constitution is the law of the land and that in Article IV, it states that "federal laws supersedes state laws" The case, Gibbons v. Ogden, impacted American commerce and government for over two hundred years in more than one way. Chief Justice Marshall said proudly "E pluribus unum," which means out of many

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    McColloch vs. Maryland was a decision constructed by The Supreme Court of the United States. Maryland undertook disrupting an operation of one of the Second Bank of the United States’ branches by striking a tax on all of the banks not authorized by Maryland. The law was identified by the court that Maryland had focused on the United States Bank. The court then allowed the Federal government to pass laws not intended to be for the Constitution’s list of expressed powers. The case that I am referring to as of right now authorized two significant principles in constitutional law. Initially, the constitution stipends implied powers to congress inclining to construct a utilitarian functional government. However, state action could likely…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gibbons Vs. Ogden Cases

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    The increase of shipping by steamboats led to conflict over waterway rights. Let's start with the Gibbons vs. Ogden case, it was in 1819. When Aaron Ogden sued Thomas Gibbons for operating steamboats in New York that Ogden owned. The Gibbons vs. Ogden case didn't go to the Supreme Court till 1824. Where the the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gibbons, and the federal government reinforce their right to regulate trade between the states by ending the monopolistic control over the waterways in some of the states.After the Supreme Court's dropped the monopolistic control the waterways, more and more companies were traveling over the waterways. That brought prices down and made it more affordable to people to buy there products.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court held that the word commerce comprehended navigation, and that it had the power to regulate navigation. Secondly, the Supreme Court held that navigation involved the control of navigable waters, and included the power to keep them open and free from obstruction, and to make improvements. Thirdly, the Supreme Court concluded that under the commerce clause Congress had the power to authorize improvements in waters within the limits of a state…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Significance: This was the first time a state law had been overturned by the Supreme Court.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    3. In this trial, the Supreme Court decided that the federal government had ultimate authority in regulating interstate commerce, and that all state commerce laws had to comply with the Federal commerce laws.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case of Muller vs. Oregon was a landmark court case that took place in 1908. The major issue…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    cases in history. It was a case that was derived on federal power. During this case, the Supreme…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Heart of Atlanta Motel, which discriminated in leasing its rooms on the premise of race, wanted a review of a judgment by attacking the lawfulness of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Heart of Atlanta Motel fought that in enacting the statue Congress surpassed its power to regulate commerce under the Commerce Clause, violating their Fifth and Thirteenth Amendments. “The Supreme Court decision was unanimous.” The Court supported the law. Justice Tom Clark was the justice who wrote for the Court. He pointed attention to that the Court had long supported Congress’s power to regulate interstate Commerce under the Commerce Clause. One of the cases referred to was Gibbons v. Ogden, decided in 1824. Starting with the 1930’s New Deal, Congress…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamdi Vs Rumsfeld Summary

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    St. Cyr, which questioned the district court?s jurisdiction under the general habeas corpus statute when dealing with illegal immigration and anti-terrorist groups. Zadvydas v. Davis, asking whether the Attorney General has the authority to arrest a removable alien after the removal period or not. Matthews vs Eldridge, dealing with an inevidentary hearing to a disabilities beneficiary being terminated violating the Due Process of the Fifth Amendment (Cornell Law, 2004).…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The scope of the Commerce Clause reached the Supreme Court in Gibbons v. Ogden, as various discrepancies involving a power struggle between the federal and state governments emerged. In 1824, a New York state law permitted individuals the exclusive right to operate steamboats…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda Law

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: * Kermit Hall, John J. Patrick, Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands, Annenberg Public Policy Center. The Pursuit of Justice: Supreme Court Decisions That Shaped America. Oxford University Press US, 2006.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Causes

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Another cause of the American Civil War was the fight for whether the government would value federal rights over states’ rights. Economic and Social differences caused the Northern States to view certain subjects differently than the Southern States. The South was also afraid that they would be outnumbered in Congressional representation and not properly exhibited. However, the Constitution allows each slave to be counted as three-fifths of a person for population count, which in turn gave the South the advantage when it came to representation. In 1857, the Dred Scott Decision declared the “freed” Negroes did not have citizenship. Northerners were very shaken by this and the South attempted to force them to return freed or runaway slaves to their owners. Not too long after, Abraham Lincoln, an anti-slavery Republican, was elected into presidency. He was convinced that slavery would never be allowed to be adopted in new territories and will ultimately be abolished. His victory ensured the South that they had drawn the short end of the stick. This sparked a fire in the South and they fell to their only other alternative. South Carolina published its “Declaration of the Causes of Secession.” They knew Abraham Lincoln was anti-slavery and believed he would give preferentiality to northern interests. His election resulted in the secession of eleven southern…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Please research and explain landmark case, such as Mapp v. Ohio, Terry v. Ohio, etc.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Broken Promises

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages

    after going to the Supreme Court, one of its most controversial clauses survived the ruling. This…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays