Preview

Getting to Yes! Book Report

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4532 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Getting to Yes! Book Report
Getting to YES, Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In is an excellent book that discusses the best methods of negotiation. The book is divided into three sections that include defining the problem, the method to solve it, and possible scenarios that may arise when using these methods. Each section is broken down into a series of chapters that is simple to navigate and outlines each of the ideas in a way that is easy for any reader to comprehend. There are also several real life explanations for each issue that make the concepts easier to apply and understand. These ideas are reflective of a method developed by the Harvard Negotiation Project called “principled negotiation”. This method combines the two ideas of soft and hard negotiation in a way that looks at the negotiation objectively and separates the negotiator from the issue. By looking at the negotiation and separating personally from it, the best outcomes for both parties are likely to occur. To further explain, below is an outline of the principled negotiation method divided in the same manner as the text with real life applications of these methods and how they can benefit my professional life personally.

1: THE PROBLEM – Don’t Bargain Over Positions

Chapter one explains that when negotiating, it is important to maintain positions at all times. A position is where you stand in an argument and defines what you are negotiating for. As you argue your posistion, you are less likely to bend on that position because you continue to defend it, the stronger bond you form with it. The chapter also discusses the two types of negotiation that are usually seen which include either soft or hard negotiation. In hard negotiation, both parties are considered adversaries and holds the negotiation as a competition in which only one party can win. Soft negotiation focuses on maintaining a friendly relationship between the two parties involved and is more likely to promote a loss in order to make a deal. In both

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    References: Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2007). Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2007). Negotiation: readings exercises, and cases…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Research Report

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed). New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill.…

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Fisher, R & Ury, W. (1983). Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. New York:…

    • 3428 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Artful Negotiating

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After viewing the video titled, Artful Negotiating by Herb Cohen I have referenced three negotiation topics from the textbook, Negotiation / Roy J. Lewicki, Bruce Barry, David M. Saunders – 6th ed.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Penguin.…

    • 2972 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Fisher, Roger, and William Ury. (2000). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. 2nd ed. Penguin. Accessed on Thursday, August 23rd from http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/small/Mail-Op/Negotiation.html…

    • 2410 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was a pure pleasure listening to the four negotiation experts to share and discuss about their stories, experiences, and strengths in negotiation. From Foxman’s story about leveraging on underestimation to Biechele’s story about that there are always ways around the dead-end; I learned that negotiation is much more than just slicing the pie, it is an art. Moreover, there are various components and techniques involved in the process that truly makes negotiation intriguing and significant.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lewicki, R.J., Saunders, D.M., & Barry, B. (2006). Negotiation (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Integrative Bargaining

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It will be the purpose of this essay to clearly demonstrate that integrative bargaining can and should be used as an effective tool for negotiations in situations where unequal bargaining power exist. It has been defined for this essay that integrative bargaining is the process of defining goals that allow both sides to achieve their objectives, and engage in a process that permits both parties to maximize their objectives (Lewicki, 2007). Integrative bargaining can be used as an effective strategy to manoeuvre out from under superior bargaining power being held over you, or as a means to create greater value for all parties involved. Bargaining power, described as the capacity of one party to dominate the other due to its influence, power, size, status or through a combination of different persuasion tactics (Lewicki, 2007) is an important determinant in framing issues, however not essential to determining end agreements (Picard, 2004). Nonetheless, during the course of negotiation, one must be careful not to divulge too much sensitive material without receiving concessions in return. This has the potential to create a far greater distance among bargaining power that potentially may prevent any agreement from being reached. Other key terms necessary for the full understanding of this essay include distributive bargaining; being the process of trying to achieve one’s own objectives at the loss of the other’s (Lewicki, 2007), anchor; being an initial position around which negotiations make adjustments (Lewicki, 2007), BANTA; being the best alternative to an negotiated agreement (Lewicki, 2007), resistance points; those being the least favourable point at which a party would agree to a negotiated agreement (Lewicki, 2007), and bargaining range; the range between either parties’ resistance points (Lewicki, 2007). The essay will then proceed to conclude by summarizing the main points discussed within this essay.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3d Negotiation

    • 7591 Words
    • 31 Pages

    What stands between you and the yes you want? In our analysis of hundreds of negotiations, we’ve uncovered barriers in three complementary dimensions: The first is tactics; the second is deal design; and the third is setup. Each dimension is crucial, but many negotiators and much of the negotiation literature fixate on only the first two. For instance, most negotiation books focus on how executives can master tactics—interactions at the bargaining table. The common barriers to yes in this dimension include a lack of trust between parties, poor communication, and negotiators’ “hardball” attitudes. So the books offer useful tips on reading body language, adapting your style to the bargaining situation, listening actively, framing your case persuasively, deciding on offers and counteroffers, managing deadlines, countering dirty tricks, avoiding cross-cultural gaffes, and so on. The second dimension, that of deal design—or negotiators’ ability to draw up a deal at the table that creates lasting value—also receives attention. When a deal does not offer…

    • 7591 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Salary Negotiation

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Negotiation is a fact of life. Negotiation takes place every day. Standard strategies for negotiation often leave people dissatisfied, worn out or alienated – and frequently all three. Standard ways to negotiation included both hard and soft ways. Soft negotiators want to avoid personal conflict and so make concessions readily in order to reach agreement. He wants an amicable resolution, yet he often ends up exploited and feeling bitter. The hard negotiator seems any situation as a contest of…

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fanancial Analysis

    • 14300 Words
    • 58 Pages

    Fisher, R. and Ury, W. (1991) Getting to ‘Yes’: Negotiating an Agreement without Giving In (2nd edn).…

    • 14300 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Katia was assigned to manage an important and big project while in meantime her organization was experiencing a downsizing. Because of some of the workers or Katia’s colleague has resigned , Katia facing a problems whereby she need an adequate staffs to complete the project on time.…

    • 2987 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays