Preview

Gene Editing Vs Synthetic Biology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1604 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gene Editing Vs Synthetic Biology
Gene editing and synthetic biology are two techniques that go hand in hand but differ ever so slightly. It is this slight divergence that makes a world of a difference. Gene editing is defined as the process of editing an organism’s DNA by altering, removing or adding nucleotides to the genome. Whereas synthetic biology is defined as a combination of molecular biology and systems biology with engineering principles to design biological systems and bio-factories, or the use of molecular biology tools and techniques to forward-engineer cellular behavior. By definition, both are means to redesign the very building blocks of life with synthetic biology being the new kid on the block stirring up a lot of attention. Humans have been involved in the …show more content…
Gene editing and synthetic biology have the potential to change life as we know it, but there are those who feel that the type of power that will be available in the near future because of genome editing is not meant to be wielded by man. Theologians believe that by using synthetic biology to alter DNA scientists are stepping into the role of God and anyone who chooses to “play God” is guilty of megalomania. (Dabrock, 2009) The scientists see gene editing as a way to improve the quality of life all around the world by effectively eliminating diseases and disorders. The scientists would go in and edit the genes of human embryos, removing genetic material that codes for harmful or fatal diseases, creating genetically modified humans. (Center for Genetics and Society, n.d.) The thought of a world free from diseases is magnificent because it would mean a world with less suffering, but then there is the worry that by genetically engineering humans we could accidentally give rise to new social inequalities. These inequalities could have the potential to escalate to a Hitler-like belief that those who are modified are inherently better than those who are not. Then, there are the issues of accidentally creating a negative trait, removing an unforeseen beneficial trait like the immunity to malaria that comes along with sickle cell anemia, and the effects that the modifications could have on future generations. A person could be modified to remove disease and show no ill signs, but after the genes have been passed on through generations an unforeseen ailment may become more and more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” the author Richard Hayes is responding to Ronald M. Green’s article on gene therapy. Hayes is a visiting scholar at the University of California at Berkeley and has a Ph.D. in Energy and Resources. He has also addressed the United Nations about banning human cloning worldwide. The author argues against using genetic therapy in human research because of the risk it provides for human rights. He believes that it will likely result in the escalation of social inequality. Hayes is wrong, but also right at the same time. He is right about how gene manipulation has the potential to cause some real harm, but is wrong about how people should never use genetic technologies.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genome constitutes the complete genetic make-up of an organism; its complete DNA or RNA. It contains all of the information needed to build and maintain that organism. The field of Genetic engineering is primarily concerned with manually tweaking the genome of the target organism, in order to engineer mutations with newer genetic traits with the aim of introducing specific desirable traits into a specie. Transgenic biotechnology opens a new world of possibilities, gives us hope for a better, stronger and healthier world but not everyone has such a positive outlook on genetic…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modifying genes could be a way of preventing unwanted traits or enhance characteristics (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). Unfortunately, CRISPR is a first generation tool, so there is no possibility no damage will be done to the baby. As well as no security, the baby will not have any life-threatening defects, as it is known that “curing” one disease causes another. In fact, this will create a bad relationship between parents and children (The Ethnic of ‘Designer Babies’, Tia Ghose), since the children have no choice in being modified. Using babies to alter their characteristics is using them as science experiments since there are over one hundred genes that account for each trait and fifty genes account for three percent of one gene (Against Designer Babies, Sheldon Krimsky). With many parents willing to allow these experimentations to occur on their baby, it will come at a huge…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although scientists and other supporters paint a pretty picture of how ideal our lives would be with so many genetic choices within reach, genetic engineering undermines rather than enhances the promise of humanity because we fail to see the big picture of the responsibilities and consequences of possessing such a God-like ability.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brave New World Analysis

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The science of today can create super baby's, which Huxley predicted by engineering everyone through conditioning. The debate between nature vs nurture has battled for over a century and half, as to whether genes or environment play a role in human nature. Steven Pinker a Canadian psychologist, says that genes are the reason for human behavior. Pinker reinforces his idea by talking about children, “[Anyone with a] child knows that kids come into the world with certain temperaments and talents” (Pinker, 2003). Environmental factors do not play a detrimental role in the development of children, the genes determine how the child will work. Some genes may cause children to have a bad temper, while other genes may make children behave. To edit genes was thought of as a game changer, to be able to remove unwanted traits such as the cancer gene or make people immune to every known bacteria and virus known to man. Today there is CRISPR or Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat. According to Harvard University “CRISPR changed not only the way basic research is conducted, but also the way we can now think about treating diseases” (CRISPR, para 1). Humans can edit genes in other humans to remove genes that are thought as being unworthy or useless. CRISPR can be similar to Brave New World but because of ethics and regulations on changing and or…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument between whether genetic engineering is wrong or right rages on every day, and will continue to be an issue until everybody can come to an agreement on what can and can’t be done. Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, writes about how she feels and questions the progression of modern science and how far we can go until it is just morally and ethically wrong. Through the mind of a young scientist, Mary pictures the possibility of what could happen if we venture too far into the unknown and how could it harm everyone. Knowing the line between continuing and finding things that can help society and knowing when to stop is essential to stop something from happening just like in the novel Frankenstein. Not only that, but many people argue over the fact that modifying the human body is wrong and go against the will of many different…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science has now reached a point where upcoming parents can choose what type of genes their children can be born with and not realizing that it can go terribly wrong.While trying to modify our babies the ending result can create a new illness that might not have a cure for it. According to Sheldon Krimsky “with respect to the farmer, there are safer and more dependable methods for preventing the birth of a child with a severe genetic abnormality than by genetic modification of the germ cell”. Modifying our babies can create an illness that will inquire a cure that won’t be existing but these babies will also create a gap in our society.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While there are amazing advances in genetic engineering, opponents of gene editing cast a grim light on new technologies that put the human race further to the ability to change the genetic makeup of the human genome. When the ability to edit the human genome became realized, skeptics immediately voiced their opinions on how outrageous the thought of manipulating the human genome was. To manipulate the human genome was to change the past and hinder natural selection, the cornerstone of evolution. Opponents of gene editing like Josephine Quintavalle stated, “The commodification of children in reproductive technology is turning parenthood into an unhealthy model of self-gratification rather than a relationship where unequivocal acceptance and love of the offspring, an ideal of…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is estimated that about 8 million children per year (6%) are born with serious genetic disorders. Imagine going to the doctor’s office on a sunny day with your partner, just to find out that you are carriers of a genetic disease which will most likely result in your baby’s death. All your dreams and hopes would be crashed and your hearts broken. What if you were then told that there’s a way science could solve this global issue? The term “Designer Babies” has been thought of as science fiction for a long time now to describe babies that have been genetically altered while still in the embryo form for good-looks, intelligence and to be free of genetic disease. With the new advanced reproductive technologies available, this dream could turn into reality. However, is it ethically correct to change children before they are even born? There is a lot more to this topic that has not yet been said.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hereditarily screening our posterity to improve individuals is simply dependable child rearing and an ethical commitment. As guardians we need our children to experience their fullest capacities. Genetically altering babies could be viewed as an "ethical commitment" as it makes them grow up into "morally better kids", this in light of a couple of hereditary connections to 'identity issue. Genetically modifying individuals can help improve the quality of life and overall make up the society by allowing parents to choose the DNA makeup of their offspring.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine a world where autism and downs syndrome are a thing of the past, and where there is no shortage on food for anybody. Over the years mankind has developed and improved technology to save more and more lives through the manipulation of the DNA that makes up all living organisms. However, there are those who oppose this approach. Despite the risks and ethical concerns, genetic engineering holds the potential to benefit humanity through both direct and indirect means.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Synthetic Biology?

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Although it is disheartening, money controls many decisions that humans make. Just like every other movement, synthetic biology will need funds for the project to initiate, so it will be spent in one of two ways. Many environmental conservation organizations have already "invested decades and millions of dollars in established programs" to protect endangered…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While very controversial, the fact of the matter is that gene editing on human embryos has happened, legally or otherwise. Many people oppose this form of experiments, and believe that it is not good for the human race. In theory, gene editing could give us the ability to remove certain genes and replace them with genes that could serve the same purpose but in a more efficient manner. While gene editing is not a new process, it is not an experiment that has been performed on human embryos until 2015, when a group of Chinese scientist used CRISPR technology on human embryos. CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaces short palindromic repeats), when paired with the bacterial enzyme Cas9 is able to select pieces of DNA…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genetic engineering and artificial selection both allow humans to change a species so that the members are better suited for human needs. Although he mechanism for change is not the same and artificial selection selects for traits already present in a species, considering that genetic engineering creates new traits. In the artificial selection, scientists breed only individuals that have appealing traits. In the genetic engineering, scientists use device of DNA technology to instantly control a genome. One way to adjust the genome is to fit genes from the organisms. For example, a few cotton plants are not the same from their nun-engineered…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays