Preview

Freedom of Expression, Controversy and Propaganda in the Classroom

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3884 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom of Expression, Controversy and Propaganda in the Classroom
The constitutional changes enacted by the government in 1982 have affected the rights of its individual citizens. The adoption of the Charter, guaranteeing rights and freedoms for every man, woman and child, is causing debate in school law and is forcing the provinces to re-evaluate their educational policy on a wide range of topics. Benchmark cases dealing with both teacher 's and student 's rights to freedom of expression such as: Regina v. Keegstra, Ross v. New Brunswick School Dist. No. 15, Fromm v. Ontario Peel Board of Education and Kempling v. The British Columbia College of Teachers, have generated the need to address controversy in Canada 's classrooms. A person 's freedom to express what they wish is in fact a controversial matter and in the following paper, it is my hope to be able to provide a better understanding of those issues. I will briefly describe the four aforementioned cases in order to set the groundwork for understanding the rights of teachers with respect to freedom of expression both inside and outside of their classrooms. I will also address my views with respect to the answers to the following questions: Do people in some occupations enjoy fewer freedoms or rights simply because of the nature of their employment or professions? Can extending such limitations beyond the place and hours of work ever be justified? In what occupations or professions? Based on what public policy rationalizations? The first case to address a teacher 's freedom of expression was the landmark case of Regina v. Keegstra. Mr. James Keegstra was a high school teacher in the small Alberta town of Eckville. He was an automotive shop and social studies teacher and he also served as mayor of the town for five years. In 1984, this small town teacher was charged with willfully promoting hatred towards Jews by teaching his students that the Holocaust never occurred and that Jews were treacherous, evil and responsible for depressions, anarchy and war


References: Canada first immigration reform committee. Retrieved November 18, 2005, from http://www.canadafirst.net/index.html. Canadian diversity: respecting our differences. Retrieved November 18, 2005, from http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/multi/respect_e.cfm#approach. Canadian Multiculturalism Act. Retrieved November 18, 2005, from http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/multi/policy/act_e.cfm. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Retrieved November 16, 2005, from http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/. From marches to modems, a report on organized hate crimes in metro Toronto. Retrieved November 15, 2005, from http://www.cjc.ca/docs/RD/98_Marches%20to%20Modems.doc. Hare, W., & Portelli, J.P. (2001) Philosophy of education. Calgary: Detselig. James Keegstra. Retrieved November 17, 2005, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Keegstra. The evangelical fellowship of Canada. Retrieved November 15, 2005, from http://www.evangelicalfellowship.ca/pdf/website%20summary%20of%20Kempling%20c ase.pdf. The Public Schools Act. Retrieved November 16, 2005, from http://web2.gov.mb.ca/laws/statutes/ccsm/p250_2e.php

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josh Renville, an 18 year old student attending Fargo North High School has petitioned against the school in question for violating his first amendment right to freedom of speech. The school prohibited Renville from using a photograph in which he his holding his favorite rifle for his senior portrait in the yearbook. Renville claims that by prohibiting the photograph, the school is infringing on his rights to freedom of symbolic speech. Despite Renville’s claims, the actions taken by the administrators at Fargo North High were completely constitutional. Fargo North was acting well within their constitutional limits to promote the ideals of public education, to properly monitor any media that would have been associated with the school, and to limit any action that inherently interfered with the school’s disciplinary…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Bethel School District v. Fraser a lot happened. In my understanding there was a school event in which students gave speeches. The one student gave a speech with language unaccepted in the school, and got suspended, and was not allowed to be voted in for the election. The Father got angry and believed that his sons amendment rights were being violated. He felt like his sons first amendment right of freedom of speech was being withheld from him, along with his fourteenth amendment right. The case first went to a general court and it could not be agreed upon, so in tern it went to the Supreme Court because it could not be agreed upon in the lower court system and was to controversial. The court case was taken extremely seriously because it could change school rights, as they were known.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tinker v. Des Moines, New Jersey v. T.L.O., and Ingraham v. Wright are just three Supreme Court cases about student rights. The first one, the Tinker v. Des Moines is a case that took place in 1965. The issue of this case was the freedom of speech in school. It all started on one day when John and Mary Beth Tinker along with their friend Chris Eckhardt chose to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. School officials told them to take off the bands, but they refused. In effect they were suspended from their high school in Des Moines, Iowa. All their parents sued the school district, because they claimed it was a violation of the First amendment, the right of freedom of speech. The significance of this case is having a right to express yourself. The court limited the right of self expression. They limited the right by not giving students unlimited self expression. Another way they limited it was by explaining that if the act of…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tinker vs. Des Moine

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1969, Des Moines Iowa school districts, it was fine to wear the iron cross to support Nazis but it was not okay to wear arm bands to support stopping the Vietnam War. (“Tinker V. Des Moines” 3) When students wore the arm bands they were asked to go home and suspended from school. This set up the case for Tinker v. Des Moines independent school district, a case that would determine the right of free speech for students. This case can be better understood by studying the Des Moines independent schools, students and their policies, examining the decision of the court and, reflecting on how it has influenced society today.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court struck the delicate balance between maintaining an ordered school environment and inculcating First Amendment values within students in four cases, which together defined the boundaries of student-expression rights. The first of these cases, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District has been called the “magna carta of student’s expression rights.” The events in Tinker occurred in 1965 during the controversy of the Vietnam War. In Des Moines, Iowa, a group of adults and students objected to the Vietnam conflict by wearing black armbands. Principals in the area heard of these intentions and, “[feeling] that ‘the schools [were] no place for demonstrations,’” prohibited students from wearing black armbands to school. John and Mary Beth Tinker wore black armbands to school and were suspended when they refused to remove them. The Court held the prohibition and punishment an unconstitutional deprivation of the student’s expression rights because school officials could not of reasonably forecasted substantial disruption of school…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At times in schools, there could be disagreements and disputes between the decisions of government and the rights of individuals. Students attend school in order to become well-educated young adults. The schoolteacher’s main objective is to make sure that students are receiving the maximum amount of learning to prepare them for future endeavors. Schools educate students on citizenship and what it means to live in a democracy. Public schools are under the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment, which gives citizens protection of their individual liberties from governmental interference. Public school officials must obey the demands of the Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in the 1943 case West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Des Moines court case was written by Justice Abe Fortas. Its contents contribute to the ideas of those who believe certain kinds of speech should not be prohibited within an educational setting. In this majority opinion statement, Justice Abe Fortas reveals that there is an “absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate [students’] speech” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District by Justice Abe Fortas par. 9). Because of this absence of reason, students should be allowed to express their opinions and views on topics of their choice. Justice Abe Fortas justifies his statement by referencing another court case that says “school officials cannot suppress ‘expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend’ Burnside v. Byars, supra, at 749” (par. 9).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study Analysis

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essex, Nathan L., School Law and the Public Schools, A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 4th edition.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article was written to remind students and teachers of the past historical events which served to shape current American education trends, standards, policies, and norms. In writing this piece, I hope to highlight a pivotal point in American education history when the right to think and question and status quo was threatened. I carefully contemplated my audience and wrote my paper for this particular demographic of the population. I knew that my audience was educated and had at least a nominal understanding of the Scopes Monkey Trial. I assumed that most people had read or watched Inherit the Wind sometime in their life and were privy to the basic tenants of the court case; therefore, I did not go into detail explaining the specifics of the court trial. Instead, I used my page space to highlight just how important the verdict was and the specific rights which were at stake. The paper topic was chosen in response to Chapter Four: Making History. I firmly believe that the Scopes Trial is one of the most significant events in American education history and was motivated to explore it in more thorough detail.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    v. Keegstra, a case that has made a huge impact on the modification of limits to freedom of expression started in the year 1990. After being a high school teacher for 14 years in Eckville, Alberta, Keegstra was charged with “wilfully promoting hatred against an identifiable group by communicating anti-Semitic statements to his students” by teaching students racially prejudiced material targeting Jewish people. In his teachings, children were taught that Jewish people wanted to destroy Christianity and that the Holocaust was created to gain sympathy. On tests and exams, those students who wrote down the beliefs of the teacher would earn higher grades than those who wrote other views. In 1984, Keegstra was charged under section 319(2) of the Criminal Code, “Everyone who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction” (The Supreme Court of Canada).…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Canadian Human Rights Commission :: Home :: Resources :: Links." Canadian Human Rights Commission / Commission canadienne des droits de la personne.N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Nov. 2010. <http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/links/default-eng.aspx#provincial>.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: BOARD OF EDUCATION v. EARLS. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 09 April 2012. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_01_332>.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arielle: Freedom of speech can be limited when it breaks the state's compelling interest. For example, if a teacher begins to teach their own religion, it breaks a state’s compelling interest. The students can not walk out of school, unlike in a mall, where…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda Rights

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: Canadian Heritage, "GUIDE TO THE CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS." Canadian Heritage. 10 November 2007. Department of Canadian Heritage. 10 Nov 2007 <http://www.pch.gc.ca/index_e.cfm>.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays