Preview

Fred E. Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership Effectiveness

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
593 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fred E. Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership Effectiveness
Fiedler Contingency Model

Defining the situation

Fred E. Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership effectiveness was based on studies of a wide range of group effectiveness, and concentrated on the relationship between leadership and organizational performance. This is one of the earliest situation-contingent leadership theories given by Fiedler. According to him, if an organization attempts to achieve group effectiveness through leadership, then there is a need to assess the leader according to an underlying trait, assess the situation faced by the leader, and construct a proper match between the two.
Leader’s trait
In order to assess the attitudes of the leader, Fiedler developed the ‘least preferred co-worker’ (LPC) scale in which the leaders are asked about the person with whom they least like to work. The scale is a questionnaire consisting of 16 items used to reflect a leader’s underlying disposition toward others. The items in the LPC scale are pleasant / unpleasant, friendly / unfriendly, rejecting / accepting, unenthusiastic / enthusiastic, tense / relaxed, cold / warm, helpful / frustrating, cooperative / uncooperative, supportive / hostile, quarrelsome / harmonious, efficient / inefficient, gloomy / cheerful, distant / close, boring / interesting, self-assured / hesitant, open / guarded. Each item in the scale is given a single ranking of between one and eight points, with eight points indicating the most favorable rating.
Friendly 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Unfriendly

Fiedler states that leaders with high LPC scores are relationship-oriented and the ones with low scores are task-oriented. The high LPC score leaders derived most satisfaction from interpersonal relationships and therefore evaluate their least preferred co-workers in fairly favorable terms. These leaders think about the task accomplishment only after the relationship need is well satisfied. On the other hand, the low LPC score leaders derived satisfaction from performance of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2.1 Explain the relevant theories / models / frameworks/ assumptions related to the OB topic you have selected…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leaders encompass principal styles that persuade his or her values and preferences. The Fiedler contingency model centers upon suitable blending amid the leadership conditions and his or her leadership style. Determining a leader’s situation is a necessity within this model. Within the realm of The Path-Goal theory, leaders can escalate subordinate satisfaction and performance through simplifying and clearing the road to goals and by escalating the quantity and types of available rewards concerning goal achievement. The Situational Leadership Theory contends that leadership actions should adapt to match the demands of specific situations as successful leaders must…

    • 1221 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both contingency and situational theories are based on situational variables determine the leadership styles. Both say that no specific leadership style is best for all environments or certain decision making types. The success of the organization depends on the leadership style that fit the situation and abilities and traits of the group in the situation (Yuki, 2010).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Relationship-oriented leaders are primarily concerned with developing good relationships with their subordinates and being liked by them” (Jones), because of this close relationship the subordinates want to perform well. This method has already worked well for Robin but needs to be strengthened due to the fast expansion of the organization. The first situational characteristic that plays a role in the Fiedler’s contingency model for leadership is the leader-member relation, which refers to the feelings the members have towards the leader such as fondness and trust. The more positive the feelings the better the performance in the situation. The second situational characteristic is the task structure.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As indicated in the text, substitutes for leadership is a theory that “diminishes or replaces the influence of leaders” (Ivancevich, Konopaske, & Matteson, 2014, p. 435). This can be translated as having other variables that can be utilized in place of a leader or leadership thus acting as replacements that would make a leader’s influence impossible. The leadership neutralizers theory suggests that it’s “something that makes it impossible for leadership to make a difference meaning leaders tend to be less influential under certain circumstances” (Ivancevich, Konopaske, & Matteson, 2014, p. 435). Those 3 circumstances include: “if subordinates have high levels of training or experience and are independent and professional, tasks are routine…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of early criticisms of the leadership trait approach, theorists started to research leadership as a set of behaviors. They assessed what effective leaders did, created catalogs of actions, and identified expansive patterns that indicated different leadership styles.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler’s contingency model actually focuses on the two most important things in leadership styles. 1. Why, in particular situations some leaders will become more effective than other leaders even though they have equal credentials, and 2. Why a particular leader may be effective in one situation but not in another. Like the trait approach, Fiedler’s theory acknowledged that personal characteristics influence the effectiveness of leaders and he was particularly interested in the styles of leadership, and how a person approaches being a leader. Basically Fiedler considers leadership styles to be relatively fixed or enduring. He stated that leaders cannot be “taught” to be relationship oriented or task oriented, nor can a leader alter his or her style according to the situation. Their managers must either change the situation to fit the leader or put the leader somewhere where they will be effective.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership Quiz Paper

    • 4345 Words
    • 18 Pages

    31. Contingency leadership theories attempt to combine the trait and behavioral theories to explain successful, influencing leader-follower relationships.…

    • 4345 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler put forward his situational theory in 1958. He proposed that leadership was dependent upon the situation and assumed that all leaders are affected by an inherent set of leadership behaviours, which he believed was difficult to change. He identified two basic leadership styles which were task or relationship orientated. According to Tulsian and Pandey (2008) leaders who are task orientated will perform at the best level when they are in favourable or highly unfavourable situations, whereas leaders who are relationship orientated will perform best when they are in situations of medium…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    welcome

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Contingency theory to understanding leadership effectiveness attempts to combine elements of both trait and situational theory.…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) scale is used to measure the intensity of this leadership style by asking a leader a series of questions which will ask them to think of all the people with whom they have ever worked and then describe the person with whom they have worked least well. Leaders who score high on this scale are described as relationship oriented, and those who score low on the scale are identified as task oriented.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Servant Leadership

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Antoine, P. (n.d.). Fiedler 's Contingency Theory of Leadership. Retrieved May 8, 2014 from…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The final behavior area reviewed on the subject’s survey was “Leadership Skills”. For leadership skills, the subject’s average rating was 6.8. The subject rated himself the highest in this behavioral area. The lowest question rating in this behavioral area was 5.0 for question 15 “Is…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The basic premise of Fiedler’s Contingency Theory can be summed up as “contingent upon the interaction of the leader’s orientation and the favorableness of the group task situation” (Rice & Chemers, 1973, p. 281). This is quite reminiscent of the nursing process, which focuses on assessing a situation, diagnosing the problem, planning an intervention, implementing the intervention, and evaluating the outcome. A leader using Fiedler’s theory will assess the problem and adapt his or her behaviors based on the situation and the people involved (Yoder-Wise, 2007, p. 11). There is a strong emphasis on the relationship between the leader and the followers, and how this relationship affects the behaviors of the leader.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The theoretical approaches that I will use to enhance my leadership effectiveness will be to incorporate the democratic leadership style; along with the Fiedler’s Contingency Model. The democratic style of leadership delegate’s authority to others encourages participation, relies on subordinates’ knowledge for completion of tasks and depends on subordinates respect for others. (Draft, 2011, p.44)…

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays